Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases

In the field of affective computing, achieving accurate automatic detection of facial movements is an important issue, and great progress has already been made. However, a systematic evaluation of systems that now have access to the dynamic facial database remains an unmet need. This study compared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shushi Namba, Wataru Sato, Masaki Osumi, Koh Shimokawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4222
id doaj-592283f234ca4a4c86d990e66953f461
record_format Article
spelling doaj-592283f234ca4a4c86d990e66953f4612021-07-01T00:40:44ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-06-01214222422210.3390/s21124222Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression DatabasesShushi Namba0Wataru Sato1Masaki Osumi2Koh Shimokawa3Psychological Process Team, BZP, Robotics Project, RIKEN, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 6190288, JapanPsychological Process Team, BZP, Robotics Project, RIKEN, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 6190288, JapanKOHINATA Limited Liability Company, 2-7-3, Tateba, Naniwa-ku, Osaka 5560020, JapanKOHINATA Limited Liability Company, 2-7-3, Tateba, Naniwa-ku, Osaka 5560020, JapanIn the field of affective computing, achieving accurate automatic detection of facial movements is an important issue, and great progress has already been made. However, a systematic evaluation of systems that now have access to the dynamic facial database remains an unmet need. This study compared the performance of three systems (FaceReader, OpenFace, AFARtoolbox) that detect each facial movement corresponding to an action unit (AU) derived from the Facial Action Coding System. All machines could detect the presence of AUs from the dynamic facial database at a level above chance. Moreover, OpenFace and AFAR provided higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values compared to FaceReader. In addition, several confusion biases of facial components (e.g., AU12 and AU14) were observed to be related to each automated AU detection system and the static mode was superior to dynamic mode for analyzing the posed facial database. These findings demonstrate the features of prediction patterns for each system and provide guidance for research on facial expressions.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4222action unitautomatic facial detectionfacial expressionsmachine analysissensing dynamic face
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shushi Namba
Wataru Sato
Masaki Osumi
Koh Shimokawa
spellingShingle Shushi Namba
Wataru Sato
Masaki Osumi
Koh Shimokawa
Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
Sensors
action unit
automatic facial detection
facial expressions
machine analysis
sensing dynamic face
author_facet Shushi Namba
Wataru Sato
Masaki Osumi
Koh Shimokawa
author_sort Shushi Namba
title Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
title_short Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
title_full Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
title_fullStr Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
title_sort assessing automated facial action unit detection systems for analyzing cross-domain facial expression databases
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2021-06-01
description In the field of affective computing, achieving accurate automatic detection of facial movements is an important issue, and great progress has already been made. However, a systematic evaluation of systems that now have access to the dynamic facial database remains an unmet need. This study compared the performance of three systems (FaceReader, OpenFace, AFARtoolbox) that detect each facial movement corresponding to an action unit (AU) derived from the Facial Action Coding System. All machines could detect the presence of AUs from the dynamic facial database at a level above chance. Moreover, OpenFace and AFAR provided higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values compared to FaceReader. In addition, several confusion biases of facial components (e.g., AU12 and AU14) were observed to be related to each automated AU detection system and the static mode was superior to dynamic mode for analyzing the posed facial database. These findings demonstrate the features of prediction patterns for each system and provide guidance for research on facial expressions.
topic action unit
automatic facial detection
facial expressions
machine analysis
sensing dynamic face
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4222
work_keys_str_mv AT shushinamba assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases
AT watarusato assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases
AT masakiosumi assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases
AT kohshimokawa assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases
_version_ 1721347960539709440