Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases
In the field of affective computing, achieving accurate automatic detection of facial movements is an important issue, and great progress has already been made. However, a systematic evaluation of systems that now have access to the dynamic facial database remains an unmet need. This study compared...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4222 |
id |
doaj-592283f234ca4a4c86d990e66953f461 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-592283f234ca4a4c86d990e66953f4612021-07-01T00:40:44ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-06-01214222422210.3390/s21124222Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression DatabasesShushi Namba0Wataru Sato1Masaki Osumi2Koh Shimokawa3Psychological Process Team, BZP, Robotics Project, RIKEN, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 6190288, JapanPsychological Process Team, BZP, Robotics Project, RIKEN, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 6190288, JapanKOHINATA Limited Liability Company, 2-7-3, Tateba, Naniwa-ku, Osaka 5560020, JapanKOHINATA Limited Liability Company, 2-7-3, Tateba, Naniwa-ku, Osaka 5560020, JapanIn the field of affective computing, achieving accurate automatic detection of facial movements is an important issue, and great progress has already been made. However, a systematic evaluation of systems that now have access to the dynamic facial database remains an unmet need. This study compared the performance of three systems (FaceReader, OpenFace, AFARtoolbox) that detect each facial movement corresponding to an action unit (AU) derived from the Facial Action Coding System. All machines could detect the presence of AUs from the dynamic facial database at a level above chance. Moreover, OpenFace and AFAR provided higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values compared to FaceReader. In addition, several confusion biases of facial components (e.g., AU12 and AU14) were observed to be related to each automated AU detection system and the static mode was superior to dynamic mode for analyzing the posed facial database. These findings demonstrate the features of prediction patterns for each system and provide guidance for research on facial expressions.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4222action unitautomatic facial detectionfacial expressionsmachine analysissensing dynamic face |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shushi Namba Wataru Sato Masaki Osumi Koh Shimokawa |
spellingShingle |
Shushi Namba Wataru Sato Masaki Osumi Koh Shimokawa Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases Sensors action unit automatic facial detection facial expressions machine analysis sensing dynamic face |
author_facet |
Shushi Namba Wataru Sato Masaki Osumi Koh Shimokawa |
author_sort |
Shushi Namba |
title |
Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases |
title_short |
Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases |
title_full |
Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases |
title_fullStr |
Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessing Automated Facial Action Unit Detection Systems for Analyzing Cross-Domain Facial Expression Databases |
title_sort |
assessing automated facial action unit detection systems for analyzing cross-domain facial expression databases |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
In the field of affective computing, achieving accurate automatic detection of facial movements is an important issue, and great progress has already been made. However, a systematic evaluation of systems that now have access to the dynamic facial database remains an unmet need. This study compared the performance of three systems (FaceReader, OpenFace, AFARtoolbox) that detect each facial movement corresponding to an action unit (AU) derived from the Facial Action Coding System. All machines could detect the presence of AUs from the dynamic facial database at a level above chance. Moreover, OpenFace and AFAR provided higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values compared to FaceReader. In addition, several confusion biases of facial components (e.g., AU12 and AU14) were observed to be related to each automated AU detection system and the static mode was superior to dynamic mode for analyzing the posed facial database. These findings demonstrate the features of prediction patterns for each system and provide guidance for research on facial expressions. |
topic |
action unit automatic facial detection facial expressions machine analysis sensing dynamic face |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4222 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shushinamba assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases AT watarusato assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases AT masakiosumi assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases AT kohshimokawa assessingautomatedfacialactionunitdetectionsystemsforanalyzingcrossdomainfacialexpressiondatabases |
_version_ |
1721347960539709440 |