Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes

This paper summarizes the results of an engineering study to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of different types of hydrotreating processes for producing high quality gas oil blending components from heavy gas oil fraction. Hydrotreatment of feed in one-stage on NiMo/alumina and in two-stage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Z. Varga, Z. Eller, J. Hancsók
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2014-08-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5578
id doaj-591cbdf33b834e69a94cdfc5c1f030ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-591cbdf33b834e69a94cdfc5c1f030ee2021-02-20T21:23:50ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162014-08-013910.3303/CET1439277Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different ProcessesZ. VargaZ. EllerJ. HancsókThis paper summarizes the results of an engineering study to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of different types of hydrotreating processes for producing high quality gas oil blending components from heavy gas oil fraction. Hydrotreatment of feed in one-stage on NiMo/alumina and in two-stage on NiMo/alumina followed by on PtPd/zeolite catalysts were investigated. In one stage hydroprocessing sulphur and polyaromatic contents of the products met the requirements of the standard only if strict process parameters were applied which resulted in operation problems and product loss, moreover the advantageous process parameters of hydrodesulphurization and hydrodearomatization did not coincide. In two-stage hydrotreating results showed that the advantageous process parameters for reduction of sulphur and aromatics coincided. Advantageous process parameters to produce gas oil of quality meeting the requirement of the standard were determined. Based on the experimental results model for both alternatives was prepared, and heat and material balances were determined. Heat exchanger network analysis and sizing of main equipments were accomplished. Operating and investment costs were estimated for both processes, which showed that all the cost elements were higher for the two-stage process. But it provides the following advantages in comparison to one-stage process: higher yield of gas oil, better product quality allowing the application of low value hydrocarbon streams in higher quantity at the blending, the lower density of products would be the source of extra profit due to diesel fuels are sold on volume basis at the petrol stations.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5578
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Z. Varga
Z. Eller
J. Hancsók
spellingShingle Z. Varga
Z. Eller
J. Hancsók
Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet Z. Varga
Z. Eller
J. Hancsók
author_sort Z. Varga
title Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes
title_short Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes
title_full Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes
title_fullStr Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes
title_full_unstemmed Techno-Economic Evaluation of Quality Improvement of Heavy Gas Oil with Different Processes
title_sort techno-economic evaluation of quality improvement of heavy gas oil with different processes
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2014-08-01
description This paper summarizes the results of an engineering study to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of different types of hydrotreating processes for producing high quality gas oil blending components from heavy gas oil fraction. Hydrotreatment of feed in one-stage on NiMo/alumina and in two-stage on NiMo/alumina followed by on PtPd/zeolite catalysts were investigated. In one stage hydroprocessing sulphur and polyaromatic contents of the products met the requirements of the standard only if strict process parameters were applied which resulted in operation problems and product loss, moreover the advantageous process parameters of hydrodesulphurization and hydrodearomatization did not coincide. In two-stage hydrotreating results showed that the advantageous process parameters for reduction of sulphur and aromatics coincided. Advantageous process parameters to produce gas oil of quality meeting the requirement of the standard were determined. Based on the experimental results model for both alternatives was prepared, and heat and material balances were determined. Heat exchanger network analysis and sizing of main equipments were accomplished. Operating and investment costs were estimated for both processes, which showed that all the cost elements were higher for the two-stage process. But it provides the following advantages in comparison to one-stage process: higher yield of gas oil, better product quality allowing the application of low value hydrocarbon streams in higher quantity at the blending, the lower density of products would be the source of extra profit due to diesel fuels are sold on volume basis at the petrol stations.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/5578
work_keys_str_mv AT zvarga technoeconomicevaluationofqualityimprovementofheavygasoilwithdifferentprocesses
AT zeller technoeconomicevaluationofqualityimprovementofheavygasoilwithdifferentprocesses
AT jhancsok technoeconomicevaluationofqualityimprovementofheavygasoilwithdifferentprocesses
_version_ 1724259197606952960