Comparison of tree-based classification algorithms in mapping burned forest areas

In this study, we compared the performance of tree-based classification algorithms – Random Forest (RF), Rotation Forest (RotF), J48, The Alternating Decision Tree (ADTree), Forest by Penalising Attributes (Forest PA), Logical Analysis of Data Algorithm (LADTree) and Functional Trees (FT) – for mapp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dilek Kucuk Matci, Resul Comert, Ugur Avdan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Surveyors of Slovenia (Zveza geodetov Slovenije) 2020-09-01
Series:Geodetski Vestnik
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.geodetski-vestnik.com/64/3/gv64-3_matci.pdf
Description
Summary:In this study, we compared the performance of tree-based classification algorithms – Random Forest (RF), Rotation Forest (RotF), J48, The Alternating Decision Tree (ADTree), Forest by Penalising Attributes (Forest PA), Logical Analysis of Data Algorithm (LADTree) and Functional Trees (FT) – for mapping burned forest areas within the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Object-based image analysis (OBIA) was performed to pan-sharpened the Landsat 8 images. Four different burned areas, namely Kumluca, Adrasan, Anamur, and Alanya, were used as study areas. Kumluca, Anamur, and Alanya regions were used as training areas, and Adrasan region was used as the test area. Obtained results were evaluated with confusion matrix and statistically significant analysis. According to the results, FT and RotF produced more accurate results than other algorithms. Also, the results obtained with these algorithms are statistically significant.
ISSN:0351-0271
1581-1328