Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments

Abstract Background The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Später, Florian S. Frueh, Ruth M. Nickels, Michael D. Menger, Matthias W. Laschke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:Journal of Biological Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3
id doaj-58ebf77bd1c149febea41acd18fdc2c6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58ebf77bd1c149febea41acd18fdc2c62020-11-25T02:39:14ZengBMCJournal of Biological Engineering1754-16112018-11-0112111310.1186/s13036-018-0118-3Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragmentsThomas Später0Florian S. Frueh1Ruth M. Nickels2Michael D. Menger3Matthias W. Laschke4Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland UniversityDivision of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, University of ZürichInstitute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland UniversityInstitute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland UniversityInstitute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, Saarland UniversityAbstract Background The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, they represent a mixture of intact arteriolar, capillary and venular vessel segments. Therefore, we herein hypothesized that the ad-MVF-based prevascularization of scaffolds is superior to the conventional SVF single cells-based approach. Results SVF single cells and ad-MVF were enzymatically isolated from epididymal fat pads of green fluorescent protein (GFP)+ donor mice to assess their viability and cellular composition using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Moreover, collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices (Integra®) were seeded with identical amounts of the isolates and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of GFP− recipient mice for the intravital fluorescent microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of implant vascularization and incorporation throughout an observation period of 2 weeks. Non-seeded matrices served as controls. While both isolates contained a comparable fraction of endothelial cells, perivascular cells, adipocytes and stem cells, ad-MVF exhibited a significantly higher viability. After in vivo implantation, the vascularization of ad-MVF-seeded scaffolds was improved when compared to SVF-seeded ones, as indicated by a significantly higher functional microvessel density. This was associated with an enhanced cellular infiltration, collagen content and density of CD31+/GFP+ microvessels particularly in the center of the implants, demonstrating a better incorporation into the surrounding host tissue. In contrast, non-seeded matrices exhibited a poor vascularization, incorporation and epithelialization over time. Conclusions The present study demonstrates that ad-MVF are highly potent vascularization units that markedly accelerate and improve scaffold vascularization when compared to the SVF.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3Tissue engineeringStromal vascular fractionMicrovascular fragmentsIntegra®VascularizationAngiogenesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Später
Florian S. Frueh
Ruth M. Nickels
Michael D. Menger
Matthias W. Laschke
spellingShingle Thomas Später
Florian S. Frueh
Ruth M. Nickels
Michael D. Menger
Matthias W. Laschke
Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
Journal of Biological Engineering
Tissue engineering
Stromal vascular fraction
Microvascular fragments
Integra®
Vascularization
Angiogenesis
author_facet Thomas Später
Florian S. Frueh
Ruth M. Nickels
Michael D. Menger
Matthias W. Laschke
author_sort Thomas Später
title Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_short Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_full Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_fullStr Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_full_unstemmed Prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
title_sort prevascularization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds: stromal vascular fraction versus adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments
publisher BMC
series Journal of Biological Engineering
issn 1754-1611
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Abstract Background The seeding of scaffolds with the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue is a common prevascularization strategy in tissue engineering. Alternatively, adipose tissue-derived microvascular fragments (ad-MVF) may serve as vascularization units. In contrast to SVF single cells, they represent a mixture of intact arteriolar, capillary and venular vessel segments. Therefore, we herein hypothesized that the ad-MVF-based prevascularization of scaffolds is superior to the conventional SVF single cells-based approach. Results SVF single cells and ad-MVF were enzymatically isolated from epididymal fat pads of green fluorescent protein (GFP)+ donor mice to assess their viability and cellular composition using fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Moreover, collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices (Integra®) were seeded with identical amounts of the isolates and implanted into full-thickness skin defects within dorsal skinfold chambers of GFP− recipient mice for the intravital fluorescent microscopic, histological and immunohistochemical analysis of implant vascularization and incorporation throughout an observation period of 2 weeks. Non-seeded matrices served as controls. While both isolates contained a comparable fraction of endothelial cells, perivascular cells, adipocytes and stem cells, ad-MVF exhibited a significantly higher viability. After in vivo implantation, the vascularization of ad-MVF-seeded scaffolds was improved when compared to SVF-seeded ones, as indicated by a significantly higher functional microvessel density. This was associated with an enhanced cellular infiltration, collagen content and density of CD31+/GFP+ microvessels particularly in the center of the implants, demonstrating a better incorporation into the surrounding host tissue. In contrast, non-seeded matrices exhibited a poor vascularization, incorporation and epithelialization over time. Conclusions The present study demonstrates that ad-MVF are highly potent vascularization units that markedly accelerate and improve scaffold vascularization when compared to the SVF.
topic Tissue engineering
Stromal vascular fraction
Microvascular fragments
Integra®
Vascularization
Angiogenesis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13036-018-0118-3
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasspater prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT floriansfrueh prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT ruthmnickels prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT michaeldmenger prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
AT matthiaswlaschke prevascularizationofcollagenglycosaminoglycanscaffoldsstromalvascularfractionversusadiposetissuederivedmicrovascularfragments
_version_ 1724787535853387776