On school choice and test-based accountability.

Among the two most prominent school reform measures currently being implemented in The United States are school choice and test-based accountability. Until recently, the two policy initiatives remained relatively distinct from one another. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Damian W. Betebenner, Kenneth R. Howe, Samara S. Foster
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2005-10-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/146
id doaj-58e8a66c60f34b3bbb0c3d5c7c8ac44e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58e8a66c60f34b3bbb0c3d5c7c8ac44e2020-11-25T02:50:01ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412005-10-011341On school choice and test-based accountability.Damian W. BetebennerKenneth R. HoweSamara S. FosterAmong the two most prominent school reform measures currently being implemented in The United States are school choice and test-based accountability. Until recently, the two policy initiatives remained relatively distinct from one another. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), a mutualism between choice and accountability emerged whereby school choice complements test-based accountability. In the first portion of this study we present a conceptual overview of school choice and test-based accountability and explicate connections between the two that are explicit in reform implementations like NCLB or implicit within the market-based reform literature in which school choice and test-based accountability reside. In the second portion we scrutinize the connections, in particular, between school choice and test-based accountability using a large western school district with a popular choice system in place. Data from three sources are combined to explore the ways in which school choice and test-based accountability draw on each other: state assessment data of children in the district, school choice data for every participating student in the district choice program, and a parental survey of both participants and non-participants of choice asking their attitudes concerning the use of school report cards in the district. Results suggest that choice is of benefit academically to only the lowest achieving students, choice participation is not uniform across different ethnic groups in the district, and parents' primary motivations as reported on a survey for participation in choice are not due to test scores, though this is not consistent with choice preferences among parents in the district. As such, our results generally confirm the hypotheses of choice critics more so than advocates. Keywords: school choice; accountability; student testing. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/146school choiceaccountabilitystudent testing.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Damian W. Betebenner
Kenneth R. Howe
Samara S. Foster
spellingShingle Damian W. Betebenner
Kenneth R. Howe
Samara S. Foster
On school choice and test-based accountability.
Education Policy Analysis Archives
school choice
accountability
student testing.
author_facet Damian W. Betebenner
Kenneth R. Howe
Samara S. Foster
author_sort Damian W. Betebenner
title On school choice and test-based accountability.
title_short On school choice and test-based accountability.
title_full On school choice and test-based accountability.
title_fullStr On school choice and test-based accountability.
title_full_unstemmed On school choice and test-based accountability.
title_sort on school choice and test-based accountability.
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2005-10-01
description Among the two most prominent school reform measures currently being implemented in The United States are school choice and test-based accountability. Until recently, the two policy initiatives remained relatively distinct from one another. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), a mutualism between choice and accountability emerged whereby school choice complements test-based accountability. In the first portion of this study we present a conceptual overview of school choice and test-based accountability and explicate connections between the two that are explicit in reform implementations like NCLB or implicit within the market-based reform literature in which school choice and test-based accountability reside. In the second portion we scrutinize the connections, in particular, between school choice and test-based accountability using a large western school district with a popular choice system in place. Data from three sources are combined to explore the ways in which school choice and test-based accountability draw on each other: state assessment data of children in the district, school choice data for every participating student in the district choice program, and a parental survey of both participants and non-participants of choice asking their attitudes concerning the use of school report cards in the district. Results suggest that choice is of benefit academically to only the lowest achieving students, choice participation is not uniform across different ethnic groups in the district, and parents' primary motivations as reported on a survey for participation in choice are not due to test scores, though this is not consistent with choice preferences among parents in the district. As such, our results generally confirm the hypotheses of choice critics more so than advocates. Keywords: school choice; accountability; student testing.
topic school choice
accountability
student testing.
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/146
work_keys_str_mv AT damianwbetebenner onschoolchoiceandtestbasedaccountability
AT kennethrhowe onschoolchoiceandtestbasedaccountability
AT samarasfoster onschoolchoiceandtestbasedaccountability
_version_ 1724740655772598272