On school choice and test-based accountability.
Among the two most prominent school reform measures currently being implemented in The United States are school choice and test-based accountability. Until recently, the two policy initiatives remained relatively distinct from one another. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NC...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2005-10-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/146 |
id |
doaj-58e8a66c60f34b3bbb0c3d5c7c8ac44e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-58e8a66c60f34b3bbb0c3d5c7c8ac44e2020-11-25T02:50:01ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412005-10-011341On school choice and test-based accountability.Damian W. BetebennerKenneth R. HoweSamara S. FosterAmong the two most prominent school reform measures currently being implemented in The United States are school choice and test-based accountability. Until recently, the two policy initiatives remained relatively distinct from one another. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), a mutualism between choice and accountability emerged whereby school choice complements test-based accountability. In the first portion of this study we present a conceptual overview of school choice and test-based accountability and explicate connections between the two that are explicit in reform implementations like NCLB or implicit within the market-based reform literature in which school choice and test-based accountability reside. In the second portion we scrutinize the connections, in particular, between school choice and test-based accountability using a large western school district with a popular choice system in place. Data from three sources are combined to explore the ways in which school choice and test-based accountability draw on each other: state assessment data of children in the district, school choice data for every participating student in the district choice program, and a parental survey of both participants and non-participants of choice asking their attitudes concerning the use of school report cards in the district. Results suggest that choice is of benefit academically to only the lowest achieving students, choice participation is not uniform across different ethnic groups in the district, and parents' primary motivations as reported on a survey for participation in choice are not due to test scores, though this is not consistent with choice preferences among parents in the district. As such, our results generally confirm the hypotheses of choice critics more so than advocates. Keywords: school choice; accountability; student testing. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/146school choiceaccountabilitystudent testing. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Damian W. Betebenner Kenneth R. Howe Samara S. Foster |
spellingShingle |
Damian W. Betebenner Kenneth R. Howe Samara S. Foster On school choice and test-based accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives school choice accountability student testing. |
author_facet |
Damian W. Betebenner Kenneth R. Howe Samara S. Foster |
author_sort |
Damian W. Betebenner |
title |
On school choice and test-based accountability. |
title_short |
On school choice and test-based accountability. |
title_full |
On school choice and test-based accountability. |
title_fullStr |
On school choice and test-based accountability. |
title_full_unstemmed |
On school choice and test-based accountability. |
title_sort |
on school choice and test-based accountability. |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2005-10-01 |
description |
Among the two most prominent school reform measures currently being implemented in The United States are school choice and test-based accountability. Until recently, the two policy initiatives remained relatively distinct from one another. With the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), a mutualism between choice and accountability emerged whereby school choice complements test-based accountability. In the first portion of this study we present a conceptual overview of school choice and test-based accountability and explicate connections between the two that are explicit in reform implementations like NCLB or implicit within the market-based reform literature in which school choice and test-based accountability reside. In the second portion we scrutinize the connections, in particular, between school choice and test-based accountability using a large western school district with a popular choice system in place. Data from three sources are combined to explore the ways in which school choice and test-based accountability draw on each other: state assessment data of children in the district, school choice data for every participating student in the district choice program, and a parental survey of both participants and non-participants of choice asking their attitudes concerning the use of school report cards in the district. Results suggest that choice is of benefit academically to only the lowest achieving students, choice participation is not uniform across different ethnic groups in the district, and parents' primary motivations as reported on a survey for participation in choice are not due to test scores, though this is not consistent with choice preferences among parents in the district. As such, our results generally confirm the hypotheses of choice critics more so than advocates. Keywords: school choice; accountability; student testing. |
topic |
school choice accountability student testing. |
url |
http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/146 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT damianwbetebenner onschoolchoiceandtestbasedaccountability AT kennethrhowe onschoolchoiceandtestbasedaccountability AT samarasfoster onschoolchoiceandtestbasedaccountability |
_version_ |
1724740655772598272 |