Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph
This study aimed to explore the application of electrocardiograph (ECG) in the diagnosis of arrhythmia based on the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). ECG was classified and recognized with the DCNN. The specificity (Spe), sensitivity (Sen), accuracy (Acc), and area under curve (AUC) of the D...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Scientific Programming |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9926769 |
id |
doaj-58c801a1e741449fba06b90eced19790 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-58c801a1e741449fba06b90eced197902021-07-02T19:17:18ZengHindawi LimitedScientific Programming1875-919X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/9926769Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in ElectrocardiographYang Meng0Guoxin Liang1Mei Yue2Department of Electrocardiogram DiagnosisDepartment of UltrasoundDepartment of Electrocardiogram DiagnosisThis study aimed to explore the application of electrocardiograph (ECG) in the diagnosis of arrhythmia based on the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). ECG was classified and recognized with the DCNN. The specificity (Spe), sensitivity (Sen), accuracy (Acc), and area under curve (AUC) of the DCNN were evaluated in the Chinese Cardiovascular Disease Database (CCDD) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) arrhythmia database, respectively. The results showed that in the CCDD, the original model tested by the small sample set had an accuracy (Acc) of 82.78% and AUC of 0.882, while the Acc and AUC of the translated model were 85.69% and 0.893, respectively, so the difference was notable (P < 0.05); the Acc of the original model and the translated model was 80.12% and 82.63%, respectively, in the large sample set, so the difference was obvious (P < 0.05). In the MIT-BIH database, the Acc of normal (N) heart beat (HB) (99.38%) was higher than that of the atrial premature beat (APB) (87.45%) (P < 0.05). In a word, applying the DCNN could improve the Acc of ECG for classification and recognition, so it could be well applied to ECG signal classification.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9926769 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yang Meng Guoxin Liang Mei Yue |
spellingShingle |
Yang Meng Guoxin Liang Mei Yue Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph Scientific Programming |
author_facet |
Yang Meng Guoxin Liang Mei Yue |
author_sort |
Yang Meng |
title |
Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph |
title_short |
Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph |
title_full |
Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph |
title_fullStr |
Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep Learning-Based Arrhythmia Detection in Electrocardiograph |
title_sort |
deep learning-based arrhythmia detection in electrocardiograph |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Scientific Programming |
issn |
1875-919X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
This study aimed to explore the application of electrocardiograph (ECG) in the diagnosis of arrhythmia based on the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). ECG was classified and recognized with the DCNN. The specificity (Spe), sensitivity (Sen), accuracy (Acc), and area under curve (AUC) of the DCNN were evaluated in the Chinese Cardiovascular Disease Database (CCDD) and Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) arrhythmia database, respectively. The results showed that in the CCDD, the original model tested by the small sample set had an accuracy (Acc) of 82.78% and AUC of 0.882, while the Acc and AUC of the translated model were 85.69% and 0.893, respectively, so the difference was notable (P < 0.05); the Acc of the original model and the translated model was 80.12% and 82.63%, respectively, in the large sample set, so the difference was obvious (P < 0.05). In the MIT-BIH database, the Acc of normal (N) heart beat (HB) (99.38%) was higher than that of the atrial premature beat (APB) (87.45%) (P < 0.05). In a word, applying the DCNN could improve the Acc of ECG for classification and recognition, so it could be well applied to ECG signal classification. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9926769 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yangmeng deeplearningbasedarrhythmiadetectioninelectrocardiograph AT guoxinliang deeplearningbasedarrhythmiadetectioninelectrocardiograph AT meiyue deeplearningbasedarrhythmiadetectioninelectrocardiograph |
_version_ |
1721323810872885248 |