Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars

This study evaluated the effect of the combination of three different onlay preparation designs and two restorative materials on the stress distribution, using 3D-finite element analysis. Six models of first lower molars were created according to three preparation designs: non-retentive (nRET), trad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho, ‪Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade, João Paulo Mendes Tribst, Elisa Donária Aboucauch Grassi, Pietro Ausiello, Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra, Adriano Bressane, Renata Marques de Melo, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/1923
id doaj-58c49b8286b9478b8a7ceadbcd6f6461
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58c49b8286b9478b8a7ceadbcd6f64612021-04-12T23:02:37ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-04-01141923192310.3390/ma14081923Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated MolarsAna Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho0‪Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade1João Paulo Mendes Tribst2Elisa Donária Aboucauch Grassi3Pietro Ausiello4Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra5Adriano Bressane6Renata Marques de Melo7Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges8Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilGraduate Program in Dentistry, Department Dentistry, University of Taubate (UNITAU), Taubate 12020-270, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, ItalyDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilGraduate Oral Health Applied Science, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), São José dos Campos 12245-000, BrazilThis study evaluated the effect of the combination of three different onlay preparation designs and two restorative materials on the stress distribution, using 3D-finite element analysis. Six models of first lower molars were created according to three preparation designs: non-retentive (nRET), traditional with occlusal isthmus reduction (IST), and traditional without occlusal isthmus reduction (wIST); and according to two restorative materials: lithium-disilicate (LD) and nanoceramic resin (NR). A 600 N axial load was applied at the central fossa. All solids were considered isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. A static linear analysis was performed, and the Maximum Principal Stress (MPS) criteria were used to evaluate the results and compare the stress in MPa on the restoration, cement layer, and tooth structure (enamel and dentin). A novel statistical approach was used for quantitative analysis of the finite element analysis results. On restoration and cement layer, nRET showed a more homogeneous stress distribution, while the highest stress peaks were calculated for LD onlays (restoration: 69–110; cement layer: 10.2–13.3). On the tooth structure, the material had more influence, with better results for LD (27–38). It can be concluded that nRET design showed the best mechanical behavior compared to IST and wIST, with LD being more advantageous for tooth structure and NR for the restoration and cement layer.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/1923mechanical stressfinite element analysisdental onlaysdental prosthesisdental materials
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho
‪Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade
João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Elisa Donária Aboucauch Grassi
Pietro Ausiello
Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra
Adriano Bressane
Renata Marques de Melo
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
spellingShingle Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho
‪Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade
João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Elisa Donária Aboucauch Grassi
Pietro Ausiello
Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra
Adriano Bressane
Renata Marques de Melo
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars
Materials
mechanical stress
finite element analysis
dental onlays
dental prosthesis
dental materials
author_facet Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho
‪Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade
João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Elisa Donária Aboucauch Grassi
Pietro Ausiello
Guilherme de Siqueira Ferreira Anzaloni Saavedra
Adriano Bressane
Renata Marques de Melo
Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
author_sort Ana Beatriz Gomes de Carvalho
title Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars
title_short Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars
title_full Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars
title_fullStr Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Behavior of Different Restorative Materials and Onlay Preparation Designs in Endodontically Treated Molars
title_sort mechanical behavior of different restorative materials and onlay preparation designs in endodontically treated molars
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2021-04-01
description This study evaluated the effect of the combination of three different onlay preparation designs and two restorative materials on the stress distribution, using 3D-finite element analysis. Six models of first lower molars were created according to three preparation designs: non-retentive (nRET), traditional with occlusal isthmus reduction (IST), and traditional without occlusal isthmus reduction (wIST); and according to two restorative materials: lithium-disilicate (LD) and nanoceramic resin (NR). A 600 N axial load was applied at the central fossa. All solids were considered isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. A static linear analysis was performed, and the Maximum Principal Stress (MPS) criteria were used to evaluate the results and compare the stress in MPa on the restoration, cement layer, and tooth structure (enamel and dentin). A novel statistical approach was used for quantitative analysis of the finite element analysis results. On restoration and cement layer, nRET showed a more homogeneous stress distribution, while the highest stress peaks were calculated for LD onlays (restoration: 69–110; cement layer: 10.2–13.3). On the tooth structure, the material had more influence, with better results for LD (27–38). It can be concluded that nRET design showed the best mechanical behavior compared to IST and wIST, with LD being more advantageous for tooth structure and NR for the restoration and cement layer.
topic mechanical stress
finite element analysis
dental onlays
dental prosthesis
dental materials
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/8/1923
work_keys_str_mv AT anabeatrizgomesdecarvalho mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT guilhermeschmittdeandrade mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT joaopaulomendestribst mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT elisadonariaaboucauchgrassi mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT pietroausiello mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT guilhermedesiqueiraferreiraanzalonisaavedra mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT adrianobressane mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT renatamarquesdemelo mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
AT alexandreluizsoutoborges mechanicalbehaviorofdifferentrestorativematerialsandonlaypreparationdesignsinendodonticallytreatedmolars
_version_ 1721529500188016640