Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangyan Mu, Jiayi Wang, Zhiyan Liu, Hanxu Zhang, Shuang Zhou, Qian Xiang, Yimin Cui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x
id doaj-58b109c619914c0a9592349ce0eac45f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58b109c619914c0a9592349ce0eac45f2021-08-29T11:32:33ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072021-08-0121111210.1186/s12885-021-08691-xAssociation between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysisGuangyan Mu0Jiayi Wang1Zhiyan Liu2Hanxu Zhang3Shuang Zhou4Qian Xiang5Yimin Cui6Department of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University First HospitalAbstract Background The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it to that in men. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception up to August 2020. Studies reporting the effect estimates of SLT use on OCC risk in men and women, were eligible for inclusion. The relative risk ratio (RRR) was applied to calculate the sex-based difference in the relationship between SLT use and OCC risk, and pooled analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Results Nineteen studies reporting a total of 6593 OCC cases were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) suggested that SLT use was associated with an increased risk of OCC in both men (RR, 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.20; P < 0.001) and women (RR, 6.39; 95%CI, 3.16–12.93; P < 0.001). Moreover, the SLT-use-related risk of OCC was higher in women than that in men (RRR,1.79; 95%C, 1.21–2.64; P = 0.003). The risk of OCC related to SLT use in women was still significantly higher than that in men (RRR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.15–2.66; P = 0.008) after excluding indirect comparison results. Finally, a subgroup analysis suggested significant sex-based differences only in individuals who received chewed smokeless products, regardless of the control definition. Pooled analysis of studies with high design quality confirmed the notably higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Conclusions This study found that SLT use was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to verify sex-based differences in the association between use of specific smokeless products and OCC risk.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-xSmokeless tobaccoOral cavity cancerSex-based differenceMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guangyan Mu
Jiayi Wang
Zhiyan Liu
Hanxu Zhang
Shuang Zhou
Qian Xiang
Yimin Cui
spellingShingle Guangyan Mu
Jiayi Wang
Zhiyan Liu
Hanxu Zhang
Shuang Zhou
Qian Xiang
Yimin Cui
Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Cancer
Smokeless tobacco
Oral cavity cancer
Sex-based difference
Meta-analysis
author_facet Guangyan Mu
Jiayi Wang
Zhiyan Liu
Hanxu Zhang
Shuang Zhou
Qian Xiang
Yimin Cui
author_sort Guangyan Mu
title Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background The impact of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use on the risk of oral cavity cancer (OCC) has been confirmed; however, the sex-based difference in this association remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the association between SLT use and OCC risk in women and compared it to that in men. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies from their inception up to August 2020. Studies reporting the effect estimates of SLT use on OCC risk in men and women, were eligible for inclusion. The relative risk ratio (RRR) was applied to calculate the sex-based difference in the relationship between SLT use and OCC risk, and pooled analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting. Results Nineteen studies reporting a total of 6593 OCC cases were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled relative risk (RR) suggested that SLT use was associated with an increased risk of OCC in both men (RR, 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05–4.20; P < 0.001) and women (RR, 6.39; 95%CI, 3.16–12.93; P < 0.001). Moreover, the SLT-use-related risk of OCC was higher in women than that in men (RRR,1.79; 95%C, 1.21–2.64; P = 0.003). The risk of OCC related to SLT use in women was still significantly higher than that in men (RRR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.15–2.66; P = 0.008) after excluding indirect comparison results. Finally, a subgroup analysis suggested significant sex-based differences only in individuals who received chewed smokeless products, regardless of the control definition. Pooled analysis of studies with high design quality confirmed the notably higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Conclusions This study found that SLT use was associated with a higher risk of OCC in women than in men. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to verify sex-based differences in the association between use of specific smokeless products and OCC risk.
topic Smokeless tobacco
Oral cavity cancer
Sex-based difference
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08691-x
work_keys_str_mv AT guangyanmu associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiayiwang associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhiyanliu associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanxuzhang associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shuangzhou associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qianxiang associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yimincui associationbetweensmokelesstobaccouseandoralcavitycancerriskinwomencomparedwithmenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724162940723003392