Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
We apply competition colonization tradeoff models to tumor growth and invasion dynamics to explore the hypothesis that varying selection forces will result in predictable phenotypic differences in cells at the tumor invasive front compared to those in the core. Spatially, ecologically, and evolutio...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00045/full |
id |
doaj-58ad2f02e3574e30a0a8b24aaf8e11e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-58ad2f02e3574e30a0a8b24aaf8e11e12020-11-25T00:03:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2013-03-01310.3389/fonc.2013.0004543163Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamicsPaul A Orlando0Robert A Gatenby1Joel S Brown2National Cancer InstituteMoffitt Cancer CenterUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoWe apply competition colonization tradeoff models to tumor growth and invasion dynamics to explore the hypothesis that varying selection forces will result in predictable phenotypic differences in cells at the tumor invasive front compared to those in the core. Spatially, ecologically, and evolutionarily explicit partial differential equation models of tumor growth confirm that spatial invasion produces selection pressure for motile phenotypes. The effects of the invasive phenotype on normal adjacent tissue determine the patterns of growth and phenotype distribution. If tumor cells do not destroy their environment, colonizer and competitive phenotypes coexist with the former localized at the invasion front and the latter, to the tumor interior. If tumors cells do destroy their environment, then cell motility is strongly selected resulting in accelerated invasion speed with time. Our results suggest that the widely observed genetic heterogeneity within cancers may not be the stochastic effect of random mutations. Rather, it may be the consequence of predictable variations in environmental selection forces and corresponding phenotypic adaptations.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00045/fullSpatial Ecologyspatial selectiontumor invasioncompetition colonization tradeoffpartial differential equation model |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul A Orlando Robert A Gatenby Joel S Brown |
spellingShingle |
Paul A Orlando Robert A Gatenby Joel S Brown Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics Frontiers in Oncology Spatial Ecology spatial selection tumor invasion competition colonization tradeoff partial differential equation model |
author_facet |
Paul A Orlando Robert A Gatenby Joel S Brown |
author_sort |
Paul A Orlando |
title |
Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics |
title_short |
Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics |
title_full |
Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics |
title_fullStr |
Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics |
title_sort |
tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2013-03-01 |
description |
We apply competition colonization tradeoff models to tumor growth and invasion dynamics to explore the hypothesis that varying selection forces will result in predictable phenotypic differences in cells at the tumor invasive front compared to those in the core. Spatially, ecologically, and evolutionarily explicit partial differential equation models of tumor growth confirm that spatial invasion produces selection pressure for motile phenotypes. The effects of the invasive phenotype on normal adjacent tissue determine the patterns of growth and phenotype distribution. If tumor cells do not destroy their environment, colonizer and competitive phenotypes coexist with the former localized at the invasion front and the latter, to the tumor interior. If tumors cells do destroy their environment, then cell motility is strongly selected resulting in accelerated invasion speed with time. Our results suggest that the widely observed genetic heterogeneity within cancers may not be the stochastic effect of random mutations. Rather, it may be the consequence of predictable variations in environmental selection forces and corresponding phenotypic adaptations. |
topic |
Spatial Ecology spatial selection tumor invasion competition colonization tradeoff partial differential equation model |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00045/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulaorlando tumorevolutioninspacetheeffectsofcompetitioncolonizationtradeoffsontumorinvasiondynamics AT robertagatenby tumorevolutioninspacetheeffectsofcompetitioncolonizationtradeoffsontumorinvasiondynamics AT joelsbrown tumorevolutioninspacetheeffectsofcompetitioncolonizationtradeoffsontumorinvasiondynamics |
_version_ |
1725434502688276480 |