Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics

We apply competition colonization tradeoff models to tumor growth and invasion dynamics to explore the hypothesis that varying selection forces will result in predictable phenotypic differences in cells at the tumor invasive front compared to those in the core. Spatially, ecologically, and evolutio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul A Orlando, Robert A Gatenby, Joel S Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00045/full
id doaj-58ad2f02e3574e30a0a8b24aaf8e11e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58ad2f02e3574e30a0a8b24aaf8e11e12020-11-25T00:03:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2013-03-01310.3389/fonc.2013.0004543163Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamicsPaul A Orlando0Robert A Gatenby1Joel S Brown2National Cancer InstituteMoffitt Cancer CenterUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoWe apply competition colonization tradeoff models to tumor growth and invasion dynamics to explore the hypothesis that varying selection forces will result in predictable phenotypic differences in cells at the tumor invasive front compared to those in the core. Spatially, ecologically, and evolutionarily explicit partial differential equation models of tumor growth confirm that spatial invasion produces selection pressure for motile phenotypes. The effects of the invasive phenotype on normal adjacent tissue determine the patterns of growth and phenotype distribution. If tumor cells do not destroy their environment, colonizer and competitive phenotypes coexist with the former localized at the invasion front and the latter, to the tumor interior. If tumors cells do destroy their environment, then cell motility is strongly selected resulting in accelerated invasion speed with time. Our results suggest that the widely observed genetic heterogeneity within cancers may not be the stochastic effect of random mutations. Rather, it may be the consequence of predictable variations in environmental selection forces and corresponding phenotypic adaptations.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00045/fullSpatial Ecologyspatial selectiontumor invasioncompetition colonization tradeoffpartial differential equation model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul A Orlando
Robert A Gatenby
Joel S Brown
spellingShingle Paul A Orlando
Robert A Gatenby
Joel S Brown
Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
Frontiers in Oncology
Spatial Ecology
spatial selection
tumor invasion
competition colonization tradeoff
partial differential equation model
author_facet Paul A Orlando
Robert A Gatenby
Joel S Brown
author_sort Paul A Orlando
title Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
title_short Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
title_full Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
title_fullStr Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
title_sort tumor evolution in space: the effects of competition colonization tradeoffs on tumor invasion dynamics
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2013-03-01
description We apply competition colonization tradeoff models to tumor growth and invasion dynamics to explore the hypothesis that varying selection forces will result in predictable phenotypic differences in cells at the tumor invasive front compared to those in the core. Spatially, ecologically, and evolutionarily explicit partial differential equation models of tumor growth confirm that spatial invasion produces selection pressure for motile phenotypes. The effects of the invasive phenotype on normal adjacent tissue determine the patterns of growth and phenotype distribution. If tumor cells do not destroy their environment, colonizer and competitive phenotypes coexist with the former localized at the invasion front and the latter, to the tumor interior. If tumors cells do destroy their environment, then cell motility is strongly selected resulting in accelerated invasion speed with time. Our results suggest that the widely observed genetic heterogeneity within cancers may not be the stochastic effect of random mutations. Rather, it may be the consequence of predictable variations in environmental selection forces and corresponding phenotypic adaptations.
topic Spatial Ecology
spatial selection
tumor invasion
competition colonization tradeoff
partial differential equation model
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fonc.2013.00045/full
work_keys_str_mv AT paulaorlando tumorevolutioninspacetheeffectsofcompetitioncolonizationtradeoffsontumorinvasiondynamics
AT robertagatenby tumorevolutioninspacetheeffectsofcompetitioncolonizationtradeoffsontumorinvasiondynamics
AT joelsbrown tumorevolutioninspacetheeffectsofcompetitioncolonizationtradeoffsontumorinvasiondynamics
_version_ 1725434502688276480