Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation

AIM: To compare visual quality in cataract patients with low corneal astigmatism who underwent intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and evaluate effects of low levels of astigmatism on visual outcomes in multifocal pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: This retrospective review of clinical records comprised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jing Hao, Liang-Zhang Tan, Lin Li, Shao-Chong Bu, Xin-Jun Ren, Fang Tian, Hong Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2019-03-01
Series:International Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2019/3/20190312.pdf
id doaj-589fb44482cc44c799225bfcfa6ef9a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-589fb44482cc44c799225bfcfa6ef9a12020-11-25T01:33:28ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)International Journal of Ophthalmology2222-39592227-48982019-03-0112342442810.18240/ijo.2019.03.12Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantationJing Hao0Liang-Zhang Tan1Lin Li2Shao-Chong Bu3Xin-Jun Ren4Fang Tian5Hong Zhang6Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, China; North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, ChinaTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, ChinaTangshan Gongren Hospital, Tangshan 063000, Hebei Province, ChinaTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, ChinaTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, ChinaTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, ChinaTianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin 300384, ChinaAIM: To compare visual quality in cataract patients with low corneal astigmatism who underwent intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and evaluate effects of low levels of astigmatism on visual outcomes in multifocal pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: This retrospective review of clinical records comprised patients with preoperative regular corneal astigmatism of 0.75-1.0 diopters (D) with-the-rule or 0.5-0.75 D against-the-rule who had uneventful cataract surgery and AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Toric-2 IOL (ART2) or AcrySof IQ ReSTOR IOL (ReSTOR) implantation. Retrospective data collection included postoperative ART2 axis rotation, uncorrected astigmatism, uncorrected entire visual acuities, distance corrected entire visual acuities, average modulation transfer function (aMTF), Strehl ratio (SR), spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction between groups. RESULTS: Mean ART2 axis rotation was 3.12°±0.70°. No secondary surgery was required to realign IOL axis. Residual astigmatism values were -0.18±0.07 D and -0.91±0.25 D in groups ART2 and ReSTOR (P<0.05). Three months postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distant, intermediate, and near visual acuities of group A were 0.01±0.05, 0.05±0.07, 0.02±0.07 logMAR, respectively; these were better than those of group R, which were 0.08±0.06, 0.15±0.12, and 0.09±0.08 logMAR, respectively (P<0.05). aMTF, SR, and spectacle independence rates were not significantly different. All patients were satisfied with postoperative results. CONCLUSION: ART2 is more suitable than ReSTOR for cataract patients with regular corneal astigmatism 0.75-1.0 D with-the-rule or 0.5-0.75 D against-the-rule.http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2019/3/20190312.pdfvisual qualityart2restorlow corneal astigmatismmultifocal pseudophakic eyes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jing Hao
Liang-Zhang Tan
Lin Li
Shao-Chong Bu
Xin-Jun Ren
Fang Tian
Hong Zhang
spellingShingle Jing Hao
Liang-Zhang Tan
Lin Li
Shao-Chong Bu
Xin-Jun Ren
Fang Tian
Hong Zhang
Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation
International Journal of Ophthalmology
visual quality
art2
restor
low corneal astigmatism
multifocal pseudophakic eyes
author_facet Jing Hao
Liang-Zhang Tan
Lin Li
Shao-Chong Bu
Xin-Jun Ren
Fang Tian
Hong Zhang
author_sort Jing Hao
title Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation
title_short Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation
title_full Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation
title_fullStr Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after ART2 or ReSTOR intraocular lens implantation
title_sort comparison of visual quality in cataract patients with low astigmatism after art2 or restor intraocular lens implantation
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series International Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2222-3959
2227-4898
publishDate 2019-03-01
description AIM: To compare visual quality in cataract patients with low corneal astigmatism who underwent intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and evaluate effects of low levels of astigmatism on visual outcomes in multifocal pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: This retrospective review of clinical records comprised patients with preoperative regular corneal astigmatism of 0.75-1.0 diopters (D) with-the-rule or 0.5-0.75 D against-the-rule who had uneventful cataract surgery and AcrySof IQ ReSTOR Toric-2 IOL (ART2) or AcrySof IQ ReSTOR IOL (ReSTOR) implantation. Retrospective data collection included postoperative ART2 axis rotation, uncorrected astigmatism, uncorrected entire visual acuities, distance corrected entire visual acuities, average modulation transfer function (aMTF), Strehl ratio (SR), spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction between groups. RESULTS: Mean ART2 axis rotation was 3.12°±0.70°. No secondary surgery was required to realign IOL axis. Residual astigmatism values were -0.18±0.07 D and -0.91±0.25 D in groups ART2 and ReSTOR (P<0.05). Three months postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distant, intermediate, and near visual acuities of group A were 0.01±0.05, 0.05±0.07, 0.02±0.07 logMAR, respectively; these were better than those of group R, which were 0.08±0.06, 0.15±0.12, and 0.09±0.08 logMAR, respectively (P<0.05). aMTF, SR, and spectacle independence rates were not significantly different. All patients were satisfied with postoperative results. CONCLUSION: ART2 is more suitable than ReSTOR for cataract patients with regular corneal astigmatism 0.75-1.0 D with-the-rule or 0.5-0.75 D against-the-rule.
topic visual quality
art2
restor
low corneal astigmatism
multifocal pseudophakic eyes
url http://www.ijo.cn/en_publish/2019/3/20190312.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jinghao comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
AT liangzhangtan comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
AT linli comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
AT shaochongbu comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
AT xinjunren comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
AT fangtian comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
AT hongzhang comparisonofvisualqualityincataractpatientswithlowastigmatismafterart2orrestorintraocularlensimplantation
_version_ 1725077020008775680