The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.

The paper examines the opposition between Greeks and the so-called Others (foreigners, barbarians, etc.) as represented in Aeschylus’ surviving plays. This antithesis has become a major focus of scholarly interest not only in philological studies, but also in the modern historical, philosophical an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefano Amendola
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Coimbra University Press 2019-11-01
Series:Humanitas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/humanitas/article/view/5796
id doaj-588fc1e1ef734c4689d1d66cbeeaaa63
record_format Article
spelling doaj-588fc1e1ef734c4689d1d66cbeeaaa632020-11-25T02:14:03ZporCoimbra University PressHumanitas0871-15692183-17182019-11-017410.14195/2183-1718_74_1The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.Stefano Amendola The paper examines the opposition between Greeks and the so-called Others (foreigners, barbarians, etc.) as represented in Aeschylus’ surviving plays. This antithesis has become a major focus of scholarly interest not only in philological studies, but also in the modern historical, philosophical and political thought, where it corresponds to the radical opposition between ‘Greekness’ and ‘Otherness’, as well as between West and East. By focusing on this topic, the paper presents an innovative interpretation of some aeschylean texts taken from Suppliants, Agamemnon and Seven against Thebes, looking at foreign characters such as Suppliants’ Egyptian herald or Agamemnon’s Cassandra, but also at ethnically hybrid characters (the Danaids’ Chorus of the Suppliants, whose ancient bond with the Argive land is explicit, and Polynices’ army, described as an external foreign enemy). The aim of the texts’ selection is to capture the interest on Aeschylus’ lexis related to the semantic sphere of the foreigner. The assumption is that a methodology based on semantic values (especially of the terms ξένος or ξενόω, and of some compounds such as ἀστόξενος and ἐχθρόξενος) well witnesses how the Aeschylean lexicon maintains the broad semantic spectrum of the term ξένος, with the frequent co-presence of the meaning of ‘guest’ alongside that of ‘foreigner’. The argument is that in Aeschylean theatre the Greek/Others polarity is presented not only in terms of a contrast/opposition with Greekness (with the positive element of the pair destined to predominate over the Otherness), but also in terms of intermingling/confusion. Aeschylus is not only the poet of the conflict between Greeks and Barbarians, but also the inventor of collective characters in which Greek and foreign elements constantly co-exist, in order to determine hybrid identities. https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/humanitas/article/view/5796AeschylusxenosAgamemnonSeptem contra ThebesSupplices
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefano Amendola
spellingShingle Stefano Amendola
The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.
Humanitas
Aeschylus
xenos
Agamemnon
Septem contra Thebes
Supplices
author_facet Stefano Amendola
author_sort Stefano Amendola
title The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.
title_short The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.
title_full The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.
title_fullStr The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.
title_full_unstemmed The Xenoi and Greeks between Opposition and ‘Hybridization’.
title_sort xenoi and greeks between opposition and ‘hybridization’.
publisher Coimbra University Press
series Humanitas
issn 0871-1569
2183-1718
publishDate 2019-11-01
description The paper examines the opposition between Greeks and the so-called Others (foreigners, barbarians, etc.) as represented in Aeschylus’ surviving plays. This antithesis has become a major focus of scholarly interest not only in philological studies, but also in the modern historical, philosophical and political thought, where it corresponds to the radical opposition between ‘Greekness’ and ‘Otherness’, as well as between West and East. By focusing on this topic, the paper presents an innovative interpretation of some aeschylean texts taken from Suppliants, Agamemnon and Seven against Thebes, looking at foreign characters such as Suppliants’ Egyptian herald or Agamemnon’s Cassandra, but also at ethnically hybrid characters (the Danaids’ Chorus of the Suppliants, whose ancient bond with the Argive land is explicit, and Polynices’ army, described as an external foreign enemy). The aim of the texts’ selection is to capture the interest on Aeschylus’ lexis related to the semantic sphere of the foreigner. The assumption is that a methodology based on semantic values (especially of the terms ξένος or ξενόω, and of some compounds such as ἀστόξενος and ἐχθρόξενος) well witnesses how the Aeschylean lexicon maintains the broad semantic spectrum of the term ξένος, with the frequent co-presence of the meaning of ‘guest’ alongside that of ‘foreigner’. The argument is that in Aeschylean theatre the Greek/Others polarity is presented not only in terms of a contrast/opposition with Greekness (with the positive element of the pair destined to predominate over the Otherness), but also in terms of intermingling/confusion. Aeschylus is not only the poet of the conflict between Greeks and Barbarians, but also the inventor of collective characters in which Greek and foreign elements constantly co-exist, in order to determine hybrid identities.
topic Aeschylus
xenos
Agamemnon
Septem contra Thebes
Supplices
url https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/humanitas/article/view/5796
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanoamendola thexenoiandgreeksbetweenoppositionandhybridization
AT stefanoamendola xenoiandgreeksbetweenoppositionandhybridization
_version_ 1724902352221110272