Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam

Presenting the emergence and development of ijmāʿ, this paper aims to epistemologically critique the articulation of ijmāʿ in modern Western scholarship on Islam. The article argues that to understand ijmāʿ, we need to explore its social context, theological foundations, and practical consequences....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamed Mosaad Abdelaziz Mohamed
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: State Islamic University (UIN) Mataram 2020-12-01
Series:Ulumuna
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ulumuna.or.id/index.php/ujis/article/view/413
id doaj-5879fb51021342568afa0edeb6a780c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5879fb51021342568afa0edeb6a780c42021-01-21T21:41:50ZaraState Islamic University (UIN) MataramUlumuna1411-34572355-76482020-12-0124223226510.20414/ujis.v24i2.413413Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in IslamMohamed Mosaad Abdelaziz Mohamed0Northern Arizona UniversityPresenting the emergence and development of ijmāʿ, this paper aims to epistemologically critique the articulation of ijmāʿ in modern Western scholarship on Islam. The article argues that to understand ijmāʿ, we need to explore its social context, theological foundations, and practical consequences. A tolerance of the difficulty in identifying truth, an understanding of the law as being built on uncertainty, and employing jamʿ, as an assemblage are essential dynamics in the formation of the law and Muslim societies. The corpus of classical literature on ijmāʿ is expectedly contradictory, and full of gaps. Rather than seeing this as problematic, the article recognizes it as normative. Against the argument that ijmāʿ was the “foundation of foundations,” or that it was a well-defined concept that gained political power against adversaries, the article argues that in practice ijmāʿ remained marginal, and confined to the minimum necessary for each individual to be a member in the Muslim community.https://ulumuna.or.id/index.php/ujis/article/view/413ijmāʿfiqhtheologyconsensus
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamed Mosaad Abdelaziz Mohamed
spellingShingle Mohamed Mosaad Abdelaziz Mohamed
Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam
Ulumuna
ijmāʿ
fiqh
theology
consensus
author_facet Mohamed Mosaad Abdelaziz Mohamed
author_sort Mohamed Mosaad Abdelaziz Mohamed
title Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam
title_short Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam
title_full Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam
title_fullStr Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam
title_full_unstemmed Approaching Ijmāʿ: Sociological, Theological and Legal Dimensions of Consensus in Islam
title_sort approaching ijmāʿ: sociological, theological and legal dimensions of consensus in islam
publisher State Islamic University (UIN) Mataram
series Ulumuna
issn 1411-3457
2355-7648
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Presenting the emergence and development of ijmāʿ, this paper aims to epistemologically critique the articulation of ijmāʿ in modern Western scholarship on Islam. The article argues that to understand ijmāʿ, we need to explore its social context, theological foundations, and practical consequences. A tolerance of the difficulty in identifying truth, an understanding of the law as being built on uncertainty, and employing jamʿ, as an assemblage are essential dynamics in the formation of the law and Muslim societies. The corpus of classical literature on ijmāʿ is expectedly contradictory, and full of gaps. Rather than seeing this as problematic, the article recognizes it as normative. Against the argument that ijmāʿ was the “foundation of foundations,” or that it was a well-defined concept that gained political power against adversaries, the article argues that in practice ijmāʿ remained marginal, and confined to the minimum necessary for each individual to be a member in the Muslim community.
topic ijmāʿ
fiqh
theology
consensus
url https://ulumuna.or.id/index.php/ujis/article/view/413
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedmosaadabdelazizmohamed approachingijmaʿsociologicaltheologicalandlegaldimensionsofconsensusinislam
_version_ 1724329696198393856