Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious and costly disease for patients and healthcare systems. Guidelines emphasise the importance of differentiating between patients who are at high risk of mortality (those with shock and/or hypotension), who may be candidates for thrombolytic therapy or surgery, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachel Limbrey, Luke Howard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2015-09-01
Series:European Respiratory Review
Online Access:http://err.ersjournals.com/content/24/137/484.full
id doaj-58702f26398f4d02b82e354edac5289b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58702f26398f4d02b82e354edac5289b2020-11-24T21:56:16ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyEuropean Respiratory Review0905-91801600-06172015-09-012413748449710.1183/16000617.0000661406614Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolismRachel Limbrey0Luke Howard1 University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious and costly disease for patients and healthcare systems. Guidelines emphasise the importance of differentiating between patients who are at high risk of mortality (those with shock and/or hypotension), who may be candidates for thrombolytic therapy or surgery, and those with less severe presentations. Recent clinical studies and guidelines have focused particularly on risk stratification of intermediate-risk patients. Although the use of thrombolysis has been investigated in these patients, anticoagulation remains the standard treatment approach. Individual risk stratification directs initial treatment. Rates of recurrence differ between subgroups of patients with PE; therefore, a review of provoking factors, along with the risks of morbidity and bleeding, guides the duration of ongoing anticoagulation. The direct oral anticoagulants have shown similar efficacy and, in some cases, reduced major bleeding compared with standard approaches for acute treatment. They also offer the potential to reduce the burden on patients and outpatient services in the post-hospital phase. Rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban have been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism versus placebo, when given for >12 months. Patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants do not require regular coagulation monitoring, but follow-up, ideally in a specialist PE clinic in consultation with primary care providers, is recommended.http://err.ersjournals.com/content/24/137/484.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rachel Limbrey
Luke Howard
spellingShingle Rachel Limbrey
Luke Howard
Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
European Respiratory Review
author_facet Rachel Limbrey
Luke Howard
author_sort Rachel Limbrey
title Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
title_short Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
title_full Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
title_fullStr Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
title_full_unstemmed Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
title_sort developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism
publisher European Respiratory Society
series European Respiratory Review
issn 0905-9180
1600-0617
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious and costly disease for patients and healthcare systems. Guidelines emphasise the importance of differentiating between patients who are at high risk of mortality (those with shock and/or hypotension), who may be candidates for thrombolytic therapy or surgery, and those with less severe presentations. Recent clinical studies and guidelines have focused particularly on risk stratification of intermediate-risk patients. Although the use of thrombolysis has been investigated in these patients, anticoagulation remains the standard treatment approach. Individual risk stratification directs initial treatment. Rates of recurrence differ between subgroups of patients with PE; therefore, a review of provoking factors, along with the risks of morbidity and bleeding, guides the duration of ongoing anticoagulation. The direct oral anticoagulants have shown similar efficacy and, in some cases, reduced major bleeding compared with standard approaches for acute treatment. They also offer the potential to reduce the burden on patients and outpatient services in the post-hospital phase. Rivaroxaban, dabigatran and apixaban have been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism versus placebo, when given for >12 months. Patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants do not require regular coagulation monitoring, but follow-up, ideally in a specialist PE clinic in consultation with primary care providers, is recommended.
url http://err.ersjournals.com/content/24/137/484.full
work_keys_str_mv AT rachellimbrey developmentsinthemanagementandtreatmentofpulmonaryembolism
AT lukehoward developmentsinthemanagementandtreatmentofpulmonaryembolism
_version_ 1725858872863752192