Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.

INTRODUCTION:This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane Marshall, Tracey Booth, Niamh Devane, Julia Galliers, Helen Greenwood, Katerina Hilari, Richard Talbot, Stephanie Wilson, Celia Woolf
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4982664?pdf=render
id doaj-5866a9a22538410f8f1220035c8b4b61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5866a9a22538410f8f1220035c8b4b612020-11-25T02:10:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01118e016038110.1371/journal.pone.0160381Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.Jane MarshallTracey BoothNiamh DevaneJulia GalliersHelen GreenwoodKaterina HilariRichard TalbotStephanie WilsonCelia WoolfINTRODUCTION:This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5 weeks' intervention, during which they received daily language stimulation sessions in EVA Park from a support worker. The study employed a quasi randomised design, which compared a group that received immediate intervention with a waitlist control group. Outcome measures explored the effects of intervention on communication and language skills, communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation. Compliance with the intervention was also explored through attrition and usage data. RESULTS:There was excellent compliance with the intervention, with no participants lost to follow up and most (18/20) receiving at least 88% of the intended treatment dose. Intervention brought about significant gains on a measure of functional communication. Gains were achieved by both groups of participants, once intervention was received, and were well maintained. Changes on the measures of communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation were not achieved. Results are discussed with reference to previous aphasia therapy findings.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4982664?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jane Marshall
Tracey Booth
Niamh Devane
Julia Galliers
Helen Greenwood
Katerina Hilari
Richard Talbot
Stephanie Wilson
Celia Woolf
spellingShingle Jane Marshall
Tracey Booth
Niamh Devane
Julia Galliers
Helen Greenwood
Katerina Hilari
Richard Talbot
Stephanie Wilson
Celia Woolf
Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jane Marshall
Tracey Booth
Niamh Devane
Julia Galliers
Helen Greenwood
Katerina Hilari
Richard Talbot
Stephanie Wilson
Celia Woolf
author_sort Jane Marshall
title Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.
title_short Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.
title_full Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.
title_fullStr Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.
title_sort evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5 weeks' intervention, during which they received daily language stimulation sessions in EVA Park from a support worker. The study employed a quasi randomised design, which compared a group that received immediate intervention with a waitlist control group. Outcome measures explored the effects of intervention on communication and language skills, communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation. Compliance with the intervention was also explored through attrition and usage data. RESULTS:There was excellent compliance with the intervention, with no participants lost to follow up and most (18/20) receiving at least 88% of the intended treatment dose. Intervention brought about significant gains on a measure of functional communication. Gains were achieved by both groups of participants, once intervention was received, and were well maintained. Changes on the measures of communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation were not achieved. Results are discussed with reference to previous aphasia therapy findings.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4982664?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT janemarshall evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT traceybooth evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT niamhdevane evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT juliagalliers evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT helengreenwood evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT katerinahilari evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT richardtalbot evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT stephaniewilson evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT celiawoolf evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
_version_ 1724919387096350720