An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument

The aim of this study was to investigate the bias and fairness of the Culture Assessment Instrument (CAI), that is, to assess whether the mean culture scores of different groups (race, gender, age and language) discriminate on a total score and an item level. The sample consisted of 4066 respondents...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Themba J. Nkosi, Gert Roodt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2004-11-01
Series:South African Journal of Human Resource Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/37
id doaj-58633e230c554fb8b66b958e9d872347
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58633e230c554fb8b66b958e9d8723472020-11-24T23:21:39ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Human Resource Management1683-75842071-078X2004-11-012210.4102/sajhrm.v2i2.3737An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment InstrumentThemba J. Nkosi0Gert Roodt1ManagementManagementThe aim of this study was to investigate the bias and fairness of the Culture Assessment Instrument (CAI), that is, to assess whether the mean culture scores of different groups (race, gender, age and language) discriminate on a total score and an item level. The sample consisted of 4066 respondents from five different companies, originating from various industries. The scores of the 56 CAI-items were factor analysed on two levels, followed by an iterative item analyses. Significant differences between race and language mean scores were identified on a total score and item level. Where differences on an item level were detected, such item-wordings were scrutinized to ensure that they were fair, non-prejudiced and not stereotyping any group. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the CAI in its current form is not biased against any particular group and is therefore fair. Opsomming Die doel van hierdie studie was om die sydigheid en billikheid van die Culture Assessment Instrument (CAI) te ondersoek, dit is om te bepaal of gemiddelde kultuurtellings van verskillende groepe (ras, geslag, ouderdom en taal) diskrimineer op ’n totaaltelling en itemvlak. Die steekproef het bestaan uit 4066 respondente uit vyf verskillende organisasies, afkomstig uit verskillende bedrywe. Die tellings van die 56 CAI-items is op twee vlakke gefaktoranaliseer, gevolg deur ’n iteratiewe itemontleding. Beduidende verskille tussen gemiddelde tellings van rasen taalgroepe is identifiseer, maar slegs ’n klein proporsie van die variansie kon aan kultuurverskille toegeskryf word. In gevalle waar verskille op itemvlak geïdentifiseer is, is sulke item-bewoordings ondersoek vir billikheid, bevooroordeling en die nie-stereotipering van enige groep. Gebaseer op hierdie bevindinge, is daar tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat die CAI in sy huidige vorm nie sydig teenoor enige groep is nie en gevolglik billik is.https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/37Culture Assessment Instrument
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Themba J. Nkosi
Gert Roodt
spellingShingle Themba J. Nkosi
Gert Roodt
An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument
South African Journal of Human Resource Management
Culture Assessment Instrument
author_facet Themba J. Nkosi
Gert Roodt
author_sort Themba J. Nkosi
title An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument
title_short An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument
title_full An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument
title_fullStr An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment Of Bias And Fairness Of The Culture Assessment Instrument
title_sort assessment of bias and fairness of the culture assessment instrument
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Human Resource Management
issn 1683-7584
2071-078X
publishDate 2004-11-01
description The aim of this study was to investigate the bias and fairness of the Culture Assessment Instrument (CAI), that is, to assess whether the mean culture scores of different groups (race, gender, age and language) discriminate on a total score and an item level. The sample consisted of 4066 respondents from five different companies, originating from various industries. The scores of the 56 CAI-items were factor analysed on two levels, followed by an iterative item analyses. Significant differences between race and language mean scores were identified on a total score and item level. Where differences on an item level were detected, such item-wordings were scrutinized to ensure that they were fair, non-prejudiced and not stereotyping any group. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the CAI in its current form is not biased against any particular group and is therefore fair. Opsomming Die doel van hierdie studie was om die sydigheid en billikheid van die Culture Assessment Instrument (CAI) te ondersoek, dit is om te bepaal of gemiddelde kultuurtellings van verskillende groepe (ras, geslag, ouderdom en taal) diskrimineer op ’n totaaltelling en itemvlak. Die steekproef het bestaan uit 4066 respondente uit vyf verskillende organisasies, afkomstig uit verskillende bedrywe. Die tellings van die 56 CAI-items is op twee vlakke gefaktoranaliseer, gevolg deur ’n iteratiewe itemontleding. Beduidende verskille tussen gemiddelde tellings van rasen taalgroepe is identifiseer, maar slegs ’n klein proporsie van die variansie kon aan kultuurverskille toegeskryf word. In gevalle waar verskille op itemvlak geïdentifiseer is, is sulke item-bewoordings ondersoek vir billikheid, bevooroordeling en die nie-stereotipering van enige groep. Gebaseer op hierdie bevindinge, is daar tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat die CAI in sy huidige vorm nie sydig teenoor enige groep is nie en gevolglik billik is.
topic Culture Assessment Instrument
url https://sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/view/37
work_keys_str_mv AT thembajnkosi anassessmentofbiasandfairnessofthecultureassessmentinstrument
AT gertroodt anassessmentofbiasandfairnessofthecultureassessmentinstrument
AT thembajnkosi assessmentofbiasandfairnessofthecultureassessmentinstrument
AT gertroodt assessmentofbiasandfairnessofthecultureassessmentinstrument
_version_ 1725570804858486784