FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem

FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem

Finite element analysis is a valuable tool in prosthetic design and helps predict specific mechanical behaviors between mechanical testing and clinical observations1. We have studied the effect of tensile stresses of both conventional length stems with conventional neck resections and compared them...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Declan Brazil, PhD, Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation 2011-10-01
Series:Reconstructive Review
Online Access:https://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/2
id doaj-5861d1a5bc684f17bb64c9206f6e7cea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5861d1a5bc684f17bb64c9206f6e7cea2020-11-25T01:27:06ZengJoint Implant Surgery & Research FoundationReconstructive Review2331-22622331-22702011-10-011110.15438/rr.v1i1.2FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless StemDeclan Brazil, PhDTimothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)Finite element analysis is a valuable tool in prosthetic design and helps predict specific mechanical behaviors between mechanical testing and clinical observations1. We have studied the effect of tensile stresses of both conventional length stems with conventional neck resections and compared them to a novel short curved neck sparing tissue preserving stem design and have found correlation between FEA modeling and plain radiographics. Neck sparing stem with a novel conical flair does improve bio-mechanical conditions in THA as compared to conventional length cementless stems. https://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Declan Brazil, PhD
Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
spellingShingle Declan Brazil, PhD
Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem
Reconstructive Review
author_facet Declan Brazil, PhD
Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
author_sort Declan Brazil, PhD
title FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem
title_short FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem
title_full FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem
title_fullStr FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem
title_full_unstemmed FEA Analysis of Neck Sparing Versus Conventional Cementless Stem
title_sort fea analysis of neck sparing versus conventional cementless stem
publisher Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation
series Reconstructive Review
issn 2331-2262
2331-2270
publishDate 2011-10-01
description Finite element analysis is a valuable tool in prosthetic design and helps predict specific mechanical behaviors between mechanical testing and clinical observations1. We have studied the effect of tensile stresses of both conventional length stems with conventional neck resections and compared them to a novel short curved neck sparing tissue preserving stem design and have found correlation between FEA modeling and plain radiographics. Neck sparing stem with a novel conical flair does improve bio-mechanical conditions in THA as compared to conventional length cementless stems.
url https://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/2
work_keys_str_mv AT declanbrazilphd feaanalysisofnecksparingversusconventionalcementlessstem
AT timothymctighedrhshc feaanalysisofnecksparingversusconventionalcementlessstem
_version_ 1725107040522600448

Similar Items