Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents

Inhibitory control develops rather late in ontogenesis since it depends on the development of the prefrontal cortex. There are contradictory data on its relationship with creativity at different stages of ontogenesis. One of the most unstudied age periods is early adolescence. It is considered an ag...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikolaeva Elena Ivanovna, Belyaeva Evgenia Mikhailovna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/28/shsconf_pgc2021_01006.pdf
id doaj-585da9bb160a47349af812254f669f12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-585da9bb160a47349af812254f669f122021-08-02T08:02:23ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242021-01-011170100610.1051/shsconf/202111701006shsconf_pgc2021_01006Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescentsNikolaeva Elena Ivanovna0Belyaeva Evgenia Mikhailovna1Herzen State Pedagogical University, Childhood Institution, Developmental Psychology and Family Pedagogics DepartmentBunin Yelets State University, Institute of Psychology and PsychophysiologyInhibitory control develops rather late in ontogenesis since it depends on the development of the prefrontal cortex. There are contradictory data on its relationship with creativity at different stages of ontogenesis. One of the most unstudied age periods is early adolescence. It is considered an age when a child has not yet mastered the subtleties of speech expression. The purpose of the study was to reveal the connections between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents. Creativity is assessed with two tests: J. Gilford’s test and E.P. Torrance’s test. The go/go and go/no-go paradigms are used to assess inhibitory control. In the first case, subjects are presented with stimuli with a fractally organized structure. A reaction was required for each stimulus. The second case requires not responding to one of the stimuli to which one had previously developed a response. Each series consists of two identical parts. Data processing is carried out using SPSS software. The study sample consists of 158 students in grades 6-7 of which 61 are boys and 97 are girls. The result of regression analysis shows that none of the parameters of J. Guilford’s test are related to the parameters of inhibitory control. We attribute this to the fact that the test is verbal and adolescents find it difficult to find original solutions in the lexical domain. Overall score and flexibility (according to E.P. Torrance’s test) are related to the efficiency of inhibitory processes in the second part of the go/no-go test and to the quality of grasping the fractal structure of the sensory signal flow.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/28/shsconf_pgc2021_01006.pdfcognitive inhibitionself-controlregression analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikolaeva Elena Ivanovna
Belyaeva Evgenia Mikhailovna
spellingShingle Nikolaeva Elena Ivanovna
Belyaeva Evgenia Mikhailovna
Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
SHS Web of Conferences
cognitive inhibition
self-control
regression analysis
author_facet Nikolaeva Elena Ivanovna
Belyaeva Evgenia Mikhailovna
author_sort Nikolaeva Elena Ivanovna
title Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
title_short Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
title_full Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
title_fullStr Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
title_sort specific features of the relationship between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Inhibitory control develops rather late in ontogenesis since it depends on the development of the prefrontal cortex. There are contradictory data on its relationship with creativity at different stages of ontogenesis. One of the most unstudied age periods is early adolescence. It is considered an age when a child has not yet mastered the subtleties of speech expression. The purpose of the study was to reveal the connections between creativity and inhibitory control in young adolescents. Creativity is assessed with two tests: J. Gilford’s test and E.P. Torrance’s test. The go/go and go/no-go paradigms are used to assess inhibitory control. In the first case, subjects are presented with stimuli with a fractally organized structure. A reaction was required for each stimulus. The second case requires not responding to one of the stimuli to which one had previously developed a response. Each series consists of two identical parts. Data processing is carried out using SPSS software. The study sample consists of 158 students in grades 6-7 of which 61 are boys and 97 are girls. The result of regression analysis shows that none of the parameters of J. Guilford’s test are related to the parameters of inhibitory control. We attribute this to the fact that the test is verbal and adolescents find it difficult to find original solutions in the lexical domain. Overall score and flexibility (according to E.P. Torrance’s test) are related to the efficiency of inhibitory processes in the second part of the go/no-go test and to the quality of grasping the fractal structure of the sensory signal flow.
topic cognitive inhibition
self-control
regression analysis
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/28/shsconf_pgc2021_01006.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaevaelenaivanovna specificfeaturesoftherelationshipbetweencreativityandinhibitorycontrolinyoungadolescents
AT belyaevaevgeniamikhailovna specificfeaturesoftherelationshipbetweencreativityandinhibitorycontrolinyoungadolescents
_version_ 1721238805211512832