Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.
As the burden of liver disease reaches epidemic levels, there is a high unmet medical need to develop robust, accurate and reproducible non-invasive methods to quantify liver tissue characteristics for use in clinical development and ultimately in clinical practice. This prospective cross-sectional...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214921 |
id |
doaj-5859963dc92b4a2bbff5136ebcfff637 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5859963dc92b4a2bbff5136ebcfff6372021-03-03T20:44:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01144e021492110.1371/journal.pone.0214921Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver.Velicia BachtiarMatthew D KellyHenry R WilmanJaco JacobsRexford NewbouldCatherine J KellyMichael L GyngellKatherine E GrovesAndy McKayAmy H HerlihyCarolina C FernandesMark HalberstadtMarion MaguireNaomi JayaratneSophia LindenStefan NeubauerRajarshi BanerjeeAs the burden of liver disease reaches epidemic levels, there is a high unmet medical need to develop robust, accurate and reproducible non-invasive methods to quantify liver tissue characteristics for use in clinical development and ultimately in clinical practice. This prospective cross-sectional study systematically examines the repeatability and reproducibility of iron-corrected T1 (cT1), T2*, and hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) quantification with multiparametric MRI across different field strengths, scanner manufacturers and models. 61 adult participants with mixed liver disease aetiology and those without any history of liver disease underwent multiparametric MRI on combinations of 5 scanner models from two manufacturers (Siemens and Philips) at different field strengths (1.5T and 3T). We report high repeatability and reproducibility across different field strengths, manufacturers, and scanner models in standardized cT1 (repeatability CoV: 1.7%, bias -7.5ms, 95% LoA of -53.6 ms to 38.5 ms; reproducibility CoV 3.3%, bias 6.5 ms, 95% LoA of -76.3 to 89.2 ms) and T2* (repeatability CoV: 5.5%, bias -0.18 ms, 95% LoA -5.41 to 5.05 ms; reproducibility CoV 6.6%, bias -1.7 ms, 95% LoA -6.61 to 3.15 ms) in human measurements. PDFF repeatability (0.8%) and reproducibility (0.75%) coefficients showed high precision of this metric. Similar precision was observed in phantom measurements. Inspection of the ICC model indicated that most of the variance in cT1 could be accounted for by study participants (ICC = 0.91), with minimal contribution from technical differences. We demonstrate that multiparametric MRI is a non-invasive, repeatable and reproducible method for quantifying liver tissue characteristics across manufacturers (Philips and Siemens) and field strengths (1.5T and 3T).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214921 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Velicia Bachtiar Matthew D Kelly Henry R Wilman Jaco Jacobs Rexford Newbould Catherine J Kelly Michael L Gyngell Katherine E Groves Andy McKay Amy H Herlihy Carolina C Fernandes Mark Halberstadt Marion Maguire Naomi Jayaratne Sophia Linden Stefan Neubauer Rajarshi Banerjee |
spellingShingle |
Velicia Bachtiar Matthew D Kelly Henry R Wilman Jaco Jacobs Rexford Newbould Catherine J Kelly Michael L Gyngell Katherine E Groves Andy McKay Amy H Herlihy Carolina C Fernandes Mark Halberstadt Marion Maguire Naomi Jayaratne Sophia Linden Stefan Neubauer Rajarshi Banerjee Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Velicia Bachtiar Matthew D Kelly Henry R Wilman Jaco Jacobs Rexford Newbould Catherine J Kelly Michael L Gyngell Katherine E Groves Andy McKay Amy H Herlihy Carolina C Fernandes Mark Halberstadt Marion Maguire Naomi Jayaratne Sophia Linden Stefan Neubauer Rajarshi Banerjee |
author_sort |
Velicia Bachtiar |
title |
Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. |
title_short |
Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. |
title_full |
Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. |
title_fullStr |
Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. |
title_sort |
repeatability and reproducibility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
As the burden of liver disease reaches epidemic levels, there is a high unmet medical need to develop robust, accurate and reproducible non-invasive methods to quantify liver tissue characteristics for use in clinical development and ultimately in clinical practice. This prospective cross-sectional study systematically examines the repeatability and reproducibility of iron-corrected T1 (cT1), T2*, and hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) quantification with multiparametric MRI across different field strengths, scanner manufacturers and models. 61 adult participants with mixed liver disease aetiology and those without any history of liver disease underwent multiparametric MRI on combinations of 5 scanner models from two manufacturers (Siemens and Philips) at different field strengths (1.5T and 3T). We report high repeatability and reproducibility across different field strengths, manufacturers, and scanner models in standardized cT1 (repeatability CoV: 1.7%, bias -7.5ms, 95% LoA of -53.6 ms to 38.5 ms; reproducibility CoV 3.3%, bias 6.5 ms, 95% LoA of -76.3 to 89.2 ms) and T2* (repeatability CoV: 5.5%, bias -0.18 ms, 95% LoA -5.41 to 5.05 ms; reproducibility CoV 6.6%, bias -1.7 ms, 95% LoA -6.61 to 3.15 ms) in human measurements. PDFF repeatability (0.8%) and reproducibility (0.75%) coefficients showed high precision of this metric. Similar precision was observed in phantom measurements. Inspection of the ICC model indicated that most of the variance in cT1 could be accounted for by study participants (ICC = 0.91), with minimal contribution from technical differences. We demonstrate that multiparametric MRI is a non-invasive, repeatable and reproducible method for quantifying liver tissue characteristics across manufacturers (Philips and Siemens) and field strengths (1.5T and 3T). |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214921 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT veliciabachtiar repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT matthewdkelly repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT henryrwilman repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT jacojacobs repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT rexfordnewbould repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT catherinejkelly repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT michaellgyngell repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT katherineegroves repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT andymckay repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT amyhherlihy repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT carolinacfernandes repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT markhalberstadt repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT marionmaguire repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT naomijayaratne repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT sophialinden repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT stefanneubauer repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver AT rajarshibanerjee repeatabilityandreproducibilityofmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingoftheliver |
_version_ |
1714820754697093120 |