The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys

This paper investigates the impact on response quantity and quality of a diary- and booklet-based survey of using different interview methods and lottery prizes. In addition to a conventional questionnaire the survey included time-diaries for household members and a expenditure booklet for recording...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jens Bonke, Peter Fallesen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Survey Research Association 2010-09-01
Series:Survey Research Methods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/3614
id doaj-584f96aa3ea54c2dab503b6a74e56267
record_format Article
spelling doaj-584f96aa3ea54c2dab503b6a74e562672020-11-24T21:10:38ZengEuropean Survey Research AssociationSurvey Research Methods1864-33611864-33612010-09-01429110110.18148/srm/2010.v4i2.36144458The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveysJens Bonke0Peter Fallesen1Rockwool Foundation Research UnitRockwool Foundation Research UnitThis paper investigates the impact on response quantity and quality of a diary- and booklet-based survey of using different interview methods and lottery prizes. In addition to a conventional questionnaire the survey included time-diaries for household members and a expenditure booklet for recording the previous month's spending by the household. The respondents could choose to use either CATI (Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing) or web-based CAPI (Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing) for the different parts of the survey. Lottery prizes varied during the survey period, and the prizes were doubled if they had used only the CAPI method. The response rate was significantly affected by the size of the lottery prizes, and the doubling of these prizes for using the web had a high impact on the number of respondents choosing this method. The implication was that also the response quality increased as a result of the impact on the number of web interviews, because this method was found to yield a significantly higher quality for the diary, booklet and questionnaire information.https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/3614Response quantityresponse qualitysurvey methodseconomic incentives
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jens Bonke
Peter Fallesen
spellingShingle Jens Bonke
Peter Fallesen
The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
Survey Research Methods
Response quantity
response quality
survey methods
economic incentives
author_facet Jens Bonke
Peter Fallesen
author_sort Jens Bonke
title The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
title_short The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
title_full The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
title_fullStr The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
title_full_unstemmed The impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
title_sort impact of incentives and interview methods on response quantity and quality in diary- and booklet-based surveys
publisher European Survey Research Association
series Survey Research Methods
issn 1864-3361
1864-3361
publishDate 2010-09-01
description This paper investigates the impact on response quantity and quality of a diary- and booklet-based survey of using different interview methods and lottery prizes. In addition to a conventional questionnaire the survey included time-diaries for household members and a expenditure booklet for recording the previous month's spending by the household. The respondents could choose to use either CATI (Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing) or web-based CAPI (Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing) for the different parts of the survey. Lottery prizes varied during the survey period, and the prizes were doubled if they had used only the CAPI method. The response rate was significantly affected by the size of the lottery prizes, and the doubling of these prizes for using the web had a high impact on the number of respondents choosing this method. The implication was that also the response quality increased as a result of the impact on the number of web interviews, because this method was found to yield a significantly higher quality for the diary, booklet and questionnaire information.
topic Response quantity
response quality
survey methods
economic incentives
url https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/3614
work_keys_str_mv AT jensbonke theimpactofincentivesandinterviewmethodsonresponsequantityandqualityindiaryandbookletbasedsurveys
AT peterfallesen theimpactofincentivesandinterviewmethodsonresponsequantityandqualityindiaryandbookletbasedsurveys
AT jensbonke impactofincentivesandinterviewmethodsonresponsequantityandqualityindiaryandbookletbasedsurveys
AT peterfallesen impactofincentivesandinterviewmethodsonresponsequantityandqualityindiaryandbookletbasedsurveys
_version_ 1716755728962682880