Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial

• Main Authors: H W Donkers, D J Van der Veen, S Teerenstra, M J Vernooij-Dassen, M W G Nijhuis-vander Sanden, M J L Graff
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2018-10-01
• Series: BMC Geriatrics
• Subjects: Cognitive functioning; Process evaluation; Psychosocial care; Social health; Social participation
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8

Abstract Background This process evaluation article describes the lessons learned from a failed trial which aimed to assess effectiveness of the tailor-made, multidisciplinary Social Fitness Programme to improve social participation of community-dwelling older people with cognitive problems (clients) and their caregivers (couples). Methods A process evaluation was performed to get insight in 1) the implementation of the intervention, 2) the context of intervention delivery from professionals’ point of view, and 3) the potential impact of intervention delivery from participants’ perspectives. Data was gathered using mixed-methods: questionnaires, focus group discussions, interviews, medical records. Results 1) Implementation. High study decline (65,3%) was mainly caused by a lack of internal motivation to increase social participation expressed by clients. 17 couples participated, however, intervention delivery was insufficient. 2) Context. Barriers during intervention delivery were most often related to client (changing needs), caregiver (increased burden) and health professional factors (delivery of integrated care lacked routine). 3) Impact Qualitative analyses revealed participants to be satisfied with intervention delivery, we were unable to capture these results through our primary outcome measure. Conclusions This process evaluation revealed the Social Fitness study did not fit in three ways. First, framing the intervention on social participation promotion was as threatening to clients. The feeling of being unable to adequately contribute to social interactions seemed to be causing embarrassment. Second, the intervention seemed to be too complex to implement in the way it was designed. Third, there is a tension between the offering of a personalised tailor-made intervention and evaluation through a fixed study design. Trial registration The trial which is evaluated in this article (the Social Fitness study) is registered with the Dutch Trial Register (NTR), clinical trial number NTR4347.