The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
Abstract Background The purpose of this experiment was to assess the push out bond strength of Polydimethylsiloxane sealers (GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal by Colte’ne/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a reference material for compariso...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Oral Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0867-5 |
id |
doaj-583827975f7a42a28b8d647ab0e1383a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-583827975f7a42a28b8d647ab0e1383a2020-11-25T04:00:31ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312019-08-011911610.1186/s12903-019-0867-5The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentinKinley Dem0Yingfang Wu1Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga2Zhuo Dai3Xin Cao4Bingyu Zhu5Centre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityXiangya School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityAbstract Background The purpose of this experiment was to assess the push out bond strength of Polydimethylsiloxane sealers (GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal by Colte’ne/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a reference material for comparison. Methods Thirty root slices were prepared from the middle third of 10 mandibular premolars. Each slice was 1 ± 0.1 mm thick. Three holes, 0.8 mm wide each, were drilled on the axial side of each root slice. These holes were subjected to standardized irrigations and then dried using paper points. Finally, for each root slice, each hole was filled with exactly one of the following three root canal sealers: AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal. After all the holes were filled in that way, the root slices were stored on top of phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2) soaked gauze for 7 days at the temperature of 37 degrees Celsius. Then, for each root canal sealer on a root slice, the universal testing machine was used to measure the push out bond strength. The differences in push out bond strengths between the three sealer samples were assessed using the Friedman test, while the paired comparisons were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. All statistical tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at the 5%. Results According to the Friedman test the distributions of push out bond strengths of AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal were different (P < 0.05). Paired comparisons indicated that AH Plus had a significantly superior push out bond strength than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal, while the push out bond strength of GuttaFlow Bioseal was significantly stronger than that of GuttaFlow 2 (P < 0.01). Conclusions Based on these findings, AH Plus is a better root canal sealer than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0867-5Push out bond strengthAH plusGuttaFlow 2GuttaFlow bioseal |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kinley Dem Yingfang Wu Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga Zhuo Dai Xin Cao Bingyu Zhu |
spellingShingle |
Kinley Dem Yingfang Wu Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga Zhuo Dai Xin Cao Bingyu Zhu The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin BMC Oral Health Push out bond strength AH plus GuttaFlow 2 GuttaFlow bioseal |
author_facet |
Kinley Dem Yingfang Wu Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga Zhuo Dai Xin Cao Bingyu Zhu |
author_sort |
Kinley Dem |
title |
The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin |
title_short |
The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin |
title_full |
The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin |
title_fullStr |
The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin |
title_full_unstemmed |
The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin |
title_sort |
push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Oral Health |
issn |
1472-6831 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The purpose of this experiment was to assess the push out bond strength of Polydimethylsiloxane sealers (GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal by Colte’ne/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a reference material for comparison. Methods Thirty root slices were prepared from the middle third of 10 mandibular premolars. Each slice was 1 ± 0.1 mm thick. Three holes, 0.8 mm wide each, were drilled on the axial side of each root slice. These holes were subjected to standardized irrigations and then dried using paper points. Finally, for each root slice, each hole was filled with exactly one of the following three root canal sealers: AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal. After all the holes were filled in that way, the root slices were stored on top of phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2) soaked gauze for 7 days at the temperature of 37 degrees Celsius. Then, for each root canal sealer on a root slice, the universal testing machine was used to measure the push out bond strength. The differences in push out bond strengths between the three sealer samples were assessed using the Friedman test, while the paired comparisons were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. All statistical tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at the 5%. Results According to the Friedman test the distributions of push out bond strengths of AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal were different (P < 0.05). Paired comparisons indicated that AH Plus had a significantly superior push out bond strength than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal, while the push out bond strength of GuttaFlow Bioseal was significantly stronger than that of GuttaFlow 2 (P < 0.01). Conclusions Based on these findings, AH Plus is a better root canal sealer than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal. |
topic |
Push out bond strength AH plus GuttaFlow 2 GuttaFlow bioseal |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0867-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kinleydem thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT yingfangwu thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT atipatsachiwandakaminga thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT zhuodai thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT xincao thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT bingyuzhu thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT kinleydem pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT yingfangwu pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT atipatsachiwandakaminga pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT zhuodai pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT xincao pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin AT bingyuzhu pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin |
_version_ |
1724450111547768832 |