The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin

Abstract Background The purpose of this experiment was to assess the push out bond strength of Polydimethylsiloxane sealers (GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal by Colte’ne/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a reference material for compariso...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kinley Dem, Yingfang Wu, Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga, Zhuo Dai, Xin Cao, Bingyu Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0867-5
id doaj-583827975f7a42a28b8d647ab0e1383a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-583827975f7a42a28b8d647ab0e1383a2020-11-25T04:00:31ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312019-08-011911610.1186/s12903-019-0867-5The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentinKinley Dem0Yingfang Wu1Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga2Zhuo Dai3Xin Cao4Bingyu Zhu5Centre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityXiangya School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityCentre of Stomatology, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityAbstract Background The purpose of this experiment was to assess the push out bond strength of Polydimethylsiloxane sealers (GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal by Colte’ne/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a reference material for comparison. Methods Thirty root slices were prepared from the middle third of 10 mandibular premolars. Each slice was 1 ± 0.1 mm thick. Three holes, 0.8 mm wide each, were drilled on the axial side of each root slice. These holes were subjected to standardized irrigations and then dried using paper points. Finally, for each root slice, each hole was filled with exactly one of the following three root canal sealers: AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal. After all the holes were filled in that way, the root slices were stored on top of phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2) soaked gauze for 7 days at the temperature of 37 degrees Celsius. Then, for each root canal sealer on a root slice, the universal testing machine was used to measure the push out bond strength. The differences in push out bond strengths between the three sealer samples were assessed using the Friedman test, while the paired comparisons were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. All statistical tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at the 5%. Results According to the Friedman test the distributions of push out bond strengths of AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal were different (P < 0.05). Paired comparisons indicated that AH Plus had a significantly superior push out bond strength than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal, while the push out bond strength of GuttaFlow Bioseal was significantly stronger than that of GuttaFlow 2 (P < 0.01). Conclusions Based on these findings, AH Plus is a better root canal sealer than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0867-5Push out bond strengthAH plusGuttaFlow 2GuttaFlow bioseal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kinley Dem
Yingfang Wu
Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga
Zhuo Dai
Xin Cao
Bingyu Zhu
spellingShingle Kinley Dem
Yingfang Wu
Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga
Zhuo Dai
Xin Cao
Bingyu Zhu
The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
BMC Oral Health
Push out bond strength
AH plus
GuttaFlow 2
GuttaFlow bioseal
author_facet Kinley Dem
Yingfang Wu
Atipatsa Chiwanda Kaminga
Zhuo Dai
Xin Cao
Bingyu Zhu
author_sort Kinley Dem
title The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
title_short The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
title_full The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
title_fullStr The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
title_full_unstemmed The push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
title_sort push out bond strength of polydimethylsiloxane endodontic sealers to dentin
publisher BMC
series BMC Oral Health
issn 1472-6831
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Background The purpose of this experiment was to assess the push out bond strength of Polydimethylsiloxane sealers (GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal by Colte’ne/Whaledent, Altstätten, Switzerland). AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) was used as a reference material for comparison. Methods Thirty root slices were prepared from the middle third of 10 mandibular premolars. Each slice was 1 ± 0.1 mm thick. Three holes, 0.8 mm wide each, were drilled on the axial side of each root slice. These holes were subjected to standardized irrigations and then dried using paper points. Finally, for each root slice, each hole was filled with exactly one of the following three root canal sealers: AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal. After all the holes were filled in that way, the root slices were stored on top of phosphate-buffered saline solution (pH 7.2) soaked gauze for 7 days at the temperature of 37 degrees Celsius. Then, for each root canal sealer on a root slice, the universal testing machine was used to measure the push out bond strength. The differences in push out bond strengths between the three sealer samples were assessed using the Friedman test, while the paired comparisons were assessed using Wilcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction. All statistical tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at the 5%. Results According to the Friedman test the distributions of push out bond strengths of AH Plus, GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal were different (P < 0.05). Paired comparisons indicated that AH Plus had a significantly superior push out bond strength than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal, while the push out bond strength of GuttaFlow Bioseal was significantly stronger than that of GuttaFlow 2 (P < 0.01). Conclusions Based on these findings, AH Plus is a better root canal sealer than GuttaFlow 2 and GuttaFlow Bioseal.
topic Push out bond strength
AH plus
GuttaFlow 2
GuttaFlow bioseal
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12903-019-0867-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kinleydem thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT yingfangwu thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT atipatsachiwandakaminga thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT zhuodai thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT xincao thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT bingyuzhu thepushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT kinleydem pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT yingfangwu pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT atipatsachiwandakaminga pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT zhuodai pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT xincao pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
AT bingyuzhu pushoutbondstrengthofpolydimethylsiloxaneendodonticsealerstodentin
_version_ 1724450111547768832