A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization

Over the past few decades, industry and academia have made great strides to improve aspects related with optimal energy management. These include better ways for efficient energy asset management, generating great opportunities for optimization of energy distribution, discomfort minimization, energy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paraskevas Koukaras, Paschalis Gkaidatzis, Napoleon Bezas, Tommaso Bragatto, Federico Carere, Francesca Santori, Marcel Antal, Dimosthenis Ioannidis, Christos Tjortjis, Dimitrios Tzovaras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3599
id doaj-58310364b698404690639bdfb27768df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58310364b698404690639bdfb27768df2021-07-01T00:24:43ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-06-01143599359910.3390/en14123599A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort MinimizationParaskevas Koukaras0Paschalis Gkaidatzis1Napoleon Bezas2Tommaso Bragatto3Federico Carere4Francesca Santori5Marcel Antal6Dimosthenis Ioannidis7Christos Tjortjis8Dimitrios Tzovaras9Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceASM Terni S.p.A., 05100 Terni, ItalyASM Terni S.p.A., 05100 Terni, ItalyASM Terni S.p.A., 05100 Terni, ItalyDistributed Systems Research Laboratory, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400027 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceOver the past few decades, industry and academia have made great strides to improve aspects related with optimal energy management. These include better ways for efficient energy asset management, generating great opportunities for optimization of energy distribution, discomfort minimization, energy production, cost reduction and more. This paper proposes a framework for a multi-objective analysis, acting as a novel tool that offers responses for optimal energy management through a decision support system. The novelty is in the structure of the methodology, since it considers two distinct optimization problems for two actors, consumers and aggregators, with solution being able to completely or partly interact with the other one is in the form of a demand response signal exchange. The overall optimization is formulated by a bi-objective optimization problem for the consumer side, aiming at cost minimization and discomfort reduction, and a single objective optimization problem for the aggregator side aiming at cost minimization. The framework consists of three architectural layers, namely, the consumer, aggregator and decision support system (DSS), forming a tri-layer optimization framework with multiple interacting objects, such as objective functions, variables, constants and constraints. The DSS layer is responsible for decision support by forecasting the day-ahead energy management requirements. The main purpose of this study is to achieve optimal management of energy resources, considering both aggregator and consumer preferences and goals, whilst abiding with real-world system constraints. This is conducted through detailed simulations using real data from a pilot, that is part of Terni Distribution System portfolio.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3599single-objective optimizationbi-objective optimizationportfolio optimizationDecision Support Systemoptimal schedulingenergy scheduling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paraskevas Koukaras
Paschalis Gkaidatzis
Napoleon Bezas
Tommaso Bragatto
Federico Carere
Francesca Santori
Marcel Antal
Dimosthenis Ioannidis
Christos Tjortjis
Dimitrios Tzovaras
spellingShingle Paraskevas Koukaras
Paschalis Gkaidatzis
Napoleon Bezas
Tommaso Bragatto
Federico Carere
Francesca Santori
Marcel Antal
Dimosthenis Ioannidis
Christos Tjortjis
Dimitrios Tzovaras
A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
Energies
single-objective optimization
bi-objective optimization
portfolio optimization
Decision Support System
optimal scheduling
energy scheduling
author_facet Paraskevas Koukaras
Paschalis Gkaidatzis
Napoleon Bezas
Tommaso Bragatto
Federico Carere
Francesca Santori
Marcel Antal
Dimosthenis Ioannidis
Christos Tjortjis
Dimitrios Tzovaras
author_sort Paraskevas Koukaras
title A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
title_short A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
title_full A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
title_fullStr A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
title_full_unstemmed A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
title_sort tri-layer optimization framework for day-ahead energy scheduling based on cost and discomfort minimization
publisher MDPI AG
series Energies
issn 1996-1073
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Over the past few decades, industry and academia have made great strides to improve aspects related with optimal energy management. These include better ways for efficient energy asset management, generating great opportunities for optimization of energy distribution, discomfort minimization, energy production, cost reduction and more. This paper proposes a framework for a multi-objective analysis, acting as a novel tool that offers responses for optimal energy management through a decision support system. The novelty is in the structure of the methodology, since it considers two distinct optimization problems for two actors, consumers and aggregators, with solution being able to completely or partly interact with the other one is in the form of a demand response signal exchange. The overall optimization is formulated by a bi-objective optimization problem for the consumer side, aiming at cost minimization and discomfort reduction, and a single objective optimization problem for the aggregator side aiming at cost minimization. The framework consists of three architectural layers, namely, the consumer, aggregator and decision support system (DSS), forming a tri-layer optimization framework with multiple interacting objects, such as objective functions, variables, constants and constraints. The DSS layer is responsible for decision support by forecasting the day-ahead energy management requirements. The main purpose of this study is to achieve optimal management of energy resources, considering both aggregator and consumer preferences and goals, whilst abiding with real-world system constraints. This is conducted through detailed simulations using real data from a pilot, that is part of Terni Distribution System portfolio.
topic single-objective optimization
bi-objective optimization
portfolio optimization
Decision Support System
optimal scheduling
energy scheduling
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3599
work_keys_str_mv AT paraskevaskoukaras atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT paschalisgkaidatzis atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT napoleonbezas atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT tommasobragatto atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT federicocarere atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT francescasantori atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT marcelantal atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT dimosthenisioannidis atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT christostjortjis atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT dimitriostzovaras atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT paraskevaskoukaras trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT paschalisgkaidatzis trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT napoleonbezas trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT tommasobragatto trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT federicocarere trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT francescasantori trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT marcelantal trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT dimosthenisioannidis trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT christostjortjis trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
AT dimitriostzovaras trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization
_version_ 1721348729481461760