A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization
Over the past few decades, industry and academia have made great strides to improve aspects related with optimal energy management. These include better ways for efficient energy asset management, generating great opportunities for optimization of energy distribution, discomfort minimization, energy...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3599 |
id |
doaj-58310364b698404690639bdfb27768df |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-58310364b698404690639bdfb27768df2021-07-01T00:24:43ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-06-01143599359910.3390/en14123599A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort MinimizationParaskevas Koukaras0Paschalis Gkaidatzis1Napoleon Bezas2Tommaso Bragatto3Federico Carere4Francesca Santori5Marcel Antal6Dimosthenis Ioannidis7Christos Tjortjis8Dimitrios Tzovaras9Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceASM Terni S.p.A., 05100 Terni, ItalyASM Terni S.p.A., 05100 Terni, ItalyASM Terni S.p.A., 05100 Terni, ItalyDistributed Systems Research Laboratory, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400027 Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceInformation Technologies Institute, Centre for Research & Technology, 57001 Thessaloniki, GreeceOver the past few decades, industry and academia have made great strides to improve aspects related with optimal energy management. These include better ways for efficient energy asset management, generating great opportunities for optimization of energy distribution, discomfort minimization, energy production, cost reduction and more. This paper proposes a framework for a multi-objective analysis, acting as a novel tool that offers responses for optimal energy management through a decision support system. The novelty is in the structure of the methodology, since it considers two distinct optimization problems for two actors, consumers and aggregators, with solution being able to completely or partly interact with the other one is in the form of a demand response signal exchange. The overall optimization is formulated by a bi-objective optimization problem for the consumer side, aiming at cost minimization and discomfort reduction, and a single objective optimization problem for the aggregator side aiming at cost minimization. The framework consists of three architectural layers, namely, the consumer, aggregator and decision support system (DSS), forming a tri-layer optimization framework with multiple interacting objects, such as objective functions, variables, constants and constraints. The DSS layer is responsible for decision support by forecasting the day-ahead energy management requirements. The main purpose of this study is to achieve optimal management of energy resources, considering both aggregator and consumer preferences and goals, whilst abiding with real-world system constraints. This is conducted through detailed simulations using real data from a pilot, that is part of Terni Distribution System portfolio.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3599single-objective optimizationbi-objective optimizationportfolio optimizationDecision Support Systemoptimal schedulingenergy scheduling |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paraskevas Koukaras Paschalis Gkaidatzis Napoleon Bezas Tommaso Bragatto Federico Carere Francesca Santori Marcel Antal Dimosthenis Ioannidis Christos Tjortjis Dimitrios Tzovaras |
spellingShingle |
Paraskevas Koukaras Paschalis Gkaidatzis Napoleon Bezas Tommaso Bragatto Federico Carere Francesca Santori Marcel Antal Dimosthenis Ioannidis Christos Tjortjis Dimitrios Tzovaras A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization Energies single-objective optimization bi-objective optimization portfolio optimization Decision Support System optimal scheduling energy scheduling |
author_facet |
Paraskevas Koukaras Paschalis Gkaidatzis Napoleon Bezas Tommaso Bragatto Federico Carere Francesca Santori Marcel Antal Dimosthenis Ioannidis Christos Tjortjis Dimitrios Tzovaras |
author_sort |
Paraskevas Koukaras |
title |
A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization |
title_short |
A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization |
title_full |
A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization |
title_fullStr |
A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Tri-Layer Optimization Framework for Day-Ahead Energy Scheduling Based on Cost and Discomfort Minimization |
title_sort |
tri-layer optimization framework for day-ahead energy scheduling based on cost and discomfort minimization |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Over the past few decades, industry and academia have made great strides to improve aspects related with optimal energy management. These include better ways for efficient energy asset management, generating great opportunities for optimization of energy distribution, discomfort minimization, energy production, cost reduction and more. This paper proposes a framework for a multi-objective analysis, acting as a novel tool that offers responses for optimal energy management through a decision support system. The novelty is in the structure of the methodology, since it considers two distinct optimization problems for two actors, consumers and aggregators, with solution being able to completely or partly interact with the other one is in the form of a demand response signal exchange. The overall optimization is formulated by a bi-objective optimization problem for the consumer side, aiming at cost minimization and discomfort reduction, and a single objective optimization problem for the aggregator side aiming at cost minimization. The framework consists of three architectural layers, namely, the consumer, aggregator and decision support system (DSS), forming a tri-layer optimization framework with multiple interacting objects, such as objective functions, variables, constants and constraints. The DSS layer is responsible for decision support by forecasting the day-ahead energy management requirements. The main purpose of this study is to achieve optimal management of energy resources, considering both aggregator and consumer preferences and goals, whilst abiding with real-world system constraints. This is conducted through detailed simulations using real data from a pilot, that is part of Terni Distribution System portfolio. |
topic |
single-objective optimization bi-objective optimization portfolio optimization Decision Support System optimal scheduling energy scheduling |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3599 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paraskevaskoukaras atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT paschalisgkaidatzis atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT napoleonbezas atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT tommasobragatto atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT federicocarere atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT francescasantori atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT marcelantal atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT dimosthenisioannidis atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT christostjortjis atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT dimitriostzovaras atrilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT paraskevaskoukaras trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT paschalisgkaidatzis trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT napoleonbezas trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT tommasobragatto trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT federicocarere trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT francescasantori trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT marcelantal trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT dimosthenisioannidis trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT christostjortjis trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization AT dimitriostzovaras trilayeroptimizationframeworkfordayaheadenergyschedulingbasedoncostanddiscomfortminimization |
_version_ |
1721348729481461760 |