‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13

In recent years the growing involvement of militaries in the delivery of assistance in conflict-affected areas under the rubric of stabilisation or comprehensive approaches has become a key concern for humanitarian agencies, raising questions about the adequacy of existing guidance and current appro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simone Haysom, Ashley Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Security Governance 2013-08-01
Series:Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/96
id doaj-58308174ef2249d8bfd5ffbf7d4562fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58308174ef2249d8bfd5ffbf7d4562fe2020-11-25T01:39:00ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272013-08-0122Art. 3810.5334/sta.by‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13Simone HaysomAshley JacksonIn recent years the growing involvement of militaries in the delivery of assistance in conflict-affected areas under the rubric of stabilisation or comprehensive approaches has become a key concern for humanitarian agencies, raising questions about the adequacy of existing guidance and current approaches to civil-military coordination. In order to better understand the challenges of principled and effective dialogue between military forces and independent humanitarian actors in the context of combined international and national military forces pursuing stabilisation, this article charts the evolution of the civil-military dialogue in Afghanistan from 2002 until 2012. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with a range of former staff of aid agency, military, and donor organisations who were present in Afghanistan in this period as well as audits, official guidelines, and other written documents, this article provides an analytical overview of the development of stabilisation approaches in Afghanistan and the strategies aid agencies pursued in response, in particular the trajectory of mechanisms for structured dialogue. Lastly, it identifies several implications that can be drawn from this experience for aid agencies, NATO, and troop contributing nations. http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/96civil-militarystabilisationhumanitarianprotectioncivilian casualtiesintegration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Simone Haysom
Ashley Jackson
spellingShingle Simone Haysom
Ashley Jackson
‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
civil-military
stabilisation
humanitarian
protection
civilian casualties
integration
author_facet Simone Haysom
Ashley Jackson
author_sort Simone Haysom
title ‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13
title_short ‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13
title_full ‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13
title_fullStr ‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13
title_full_unstemmed ‘You don’t need to love us’: Civil-Military Relations in Afghanistan, 2002–13
title_sort ‘you don’t need to love us’: civil-military relations in afghanistan, 2002–13
publisher Centre for Security Governance
series Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
issn 2165-2627
publishDate 2013-08-01
description In recent years the growing involvement of militaries in the delivery of assistance in conflict-affected areas under the rubric of stabilisation or comprehensive approaches has become a key concern for humanitarian agencies, raising questions about the adequacy of existing guidance and current approaches to civil-military coordination. In order to better understand the challenges of principled and effective dialogue between military forces and independent humanitarian actors in the context of combined international and national military forces pursuing stabilisation, this article charts the evolution of the civil-military dialogue in Afghanistan from 2002 until 2012. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with a range of former staff of aid agency, military, and donor organisations who were present in Afghanistan in this period as well as audits, official guidelines, and other written documents, this article provides an analytical overview of the development of stabilisation approaches in Afghanistan and the strategies aid agencies pursued in response, in particular the trajectory of mechanisms for structured dialogue. Lastly, it identifies several implications that can be drawn from this experience for aid agencies, NATO, and troop contributing nations.
topic civil-military
stabilisation
humanitarian
protection
civilian casualties
integration
url http://www.stabilityjournal.org/article/view/96
work_keys_str_mv AT simonehaysom youdontneedtoloveuscivilmilitaryrelationsinafghanistan200213
AT ashleyjackson youdontneedtoloveuscivilmilitaryrelationsinafghanistan200213
_version_ 1725050900301479936