The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake

Conservation Agriculture (CA) in its many local adaptations has been practiced for more than three decades. In year 2013 it was deployed on some 155 million hectares worldwide on both large and small farms. In most cases, it has led to yield, economic and environmental benefits, and thus would appea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Kassam, Theodor Friedrich, Francis Shaxson, Herbert Bartz, Ivo Mello, Josef Kienzle, Jules Pretty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut Veolia Environnement 2014-12-01
Series:Field Actions Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/3720
id doaj-58224132fc9847279051d153dcd02eff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-58224132fc9847279051d153dcd02eff2020-11-25T01:24:11ZengInstitut Veolia EnvironnementField Actions Science Reports1867-139X1867-85212014-12-01The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptakeAmir KassamTheodor FriedrichFrancis ShaxsonHerbert BartzIvo MelloJosef KienzleJules PrettyConservation Agriculture (CA) in its many local adaptations has been practiced for more than three decades. In year 2013 it was deployed on some 155 million hectares worldwide on both large and small farms. In most cases, it has led to yield, economic and environmental benefits, and thus would appear to deserve greater policy and institutional support to accelerate opportunities for adoption and uptake. CA represents an alternate approach to the sustainable intensification of agriculture and differs fundamentally from modern approaches based largely on intensive tillage and purchased inputs that often disrupt ecosystem functions. CA incorporates a number of apparently counterintuitive and often unrecognised elements that simultaneously promote soil health, productive capacity and ecosystem services. Important constraints appear to be preventing wider-scale adoption of CA. Experience across many countries has shown that the adoption and spread of CA requires a change in commitment and behaviour of all stakeholders. For farmers, social mechanisms that encourage experimentation, learning and adaptation to local conditions are a prerequisite. For policy-makers and institutional leaders, transformation of tillage to CA systems requires that they fully understand the large economic, social and environmental benefits that these systems offer. Such transformations call for sustained policy and institutional support that provides both incentives and ‘motivations’ to encourage farmers to adopt components of CA practices and improve them over time. Here, we summarise the key institutional and policy requirements. Many of these apply widely to other forms of more sustainable agriculture.http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/3720ExtensionSoil carbonSoil healthSustainabilityTillage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amir Kassam
Theodor Friedrich
Francis Shaxson
Herbert Bartz
Ivo Mello
Josef Kienzle
Jules Pretty
spellingShingle Amir Kassam
Theodor Friedrich
Francis Shaxson
Herbert Bartz
Ivo Mello
Josef Kienzle
Jules Pretty
The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
Field Actions Science Reports
Extension
Soil carbon
Soil health
Sustainability
Tillage
author_facet Amir Kassam
Theodor Friedrich
Francis Shaxson
Herbert Bartz
Ivo Mello
Josef Kienzle
Jules Pretty
author_sort Amir Kassam
title The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
title_short The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
title_full The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
title_fullStr The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
title_full_unstemmed The spread of Conservation Agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
title_sort spread of conservation agriculture: policy and institutional support for adoption and uptake
publisher Institut Veolia Environnement
series Field Actions Science Reports
issn 1867-139X
1867-8521
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Conservation Agriculture (CA) in its many local adaptations has been practiced for more than three decades. In year 2013 it was deployed on some 155 million hectares worldwide on both large and small farms. In most cases, it has led to yield, economic and environmental benefits, and thus would appear to deserve greater policy and institutional support to accelerate opportunities for adoption and uptake. CA represents an alternate approach to the sustainable intensification of agriculture and differs fundamentally from modern approaches based largely on intensive tillage and purchased inputs that often disrupt ecosystem functions. CA incorporates a number of apparently counterintuitive and often unrecognised elements that simultaneously promote soil health, productive capacity and ecosystem services. Important constraints appear to be preventing wider-scale adoption of CA. Experience across many countries has shown that the adoption and spread of CA requires a change in commitment and behaviour of all stakeholders. For farmers, social mechanisms that encourage experimentation, learning and adaptation to local conditions are a prerequisite. For policy-makers and institutional leaders, transformation of tillage to CA systems requires that they fully understand the large economic, social and environmental benefits that these systems offer. Such transformations call for sustained policy and institutional support that provides both incentives and ‘motivations’ to encourage farmers to adopt components of CA practices and improve them over time. Here, we summarise the key institutional and policy requirements. Many of these apply widely to other forms of more sustainable agriculture.
topic Extension
Soil carbon
Soil health
Sustainability
Tillage
url http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/3720
work_keys_str_mv AT amirkassam thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT theodorfriedrich thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT francisshaxson thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT herbertbartz thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT ivomello thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT josefkienzle thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT julespretty thespreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT amirkassam spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT theodorfriedrich spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT francisshaxson spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT herbertbartz spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT ivomello spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT josefkienzle spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
AT julespretty spreadofconservationagriculturepolicyandinstitutionalsupportforadoptionanduptake
_version_ 1725118348428050432