Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland

The supply for domestic beef has been decreasing sharply since Finland joined the European Union (EU) because profitability of beef production has been low. The goal of this study is to search for optimal beef management practices that increase returns on beef production in Finland. Numerical dynami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P. PIHAMAA, K. PIETOLA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 2008-12-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Science
Online Access:https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/5708
id doaj-581b4b24911948648cea3f3c3eb23a75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-581b4b24911948648cea3f3c3eb23a752020-11-24T21:43:16ZengScientific Agricultural Society of FinlandAgricultural and Food Science1459-60671795-18952008-12-01111 Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in FinlandP. PIHAMAAK. PIETOLAThe supply for domestic beef has been decreasing sharply since Finland joined the European Union (EU) because profitability of beef production has been low. The goal of this study is to search for optimal beef management practices that increase returns on beef production in Finland. Numerical dynamic programming (DP) is used to simultaneously optimise feeding and timing of slaughtering. The DP-algorithm is solved under alternative subsidy, output price, and silage price scenarios. At 1998 prices and subsidies, the optimal carcass weight is estimated above 250 kg. The European Agenda 2000 reform is predicted to decrease the optimal carcass weight to 200 kg, which is 50 kg lower than under the 1998 prices and subsidies. This reform will increase farmer returns significantly and its income effect depends crucially on the price of silage. The results indicate also that the reform will result in adjustment of feeding. Particularly, farmers having high silage production costs will substitute feed concentrates for roughage in the diet. A farmer is entitled to a premium subsidy of FIM 200 (e33.63), provided that the carcass weight of a culled animal exceeds 270 kg. But when the Agenda 2000 reform is fully implemented, this premium subsidy is not large enough to supply carcasses heavier than 270 kg. The results suggest that carcass weights of at least 270 kg would require a premium subsidy of FIM 400-800 (e67-134). Rearing heavy animals will significantly increase production costs and, therefore, most of the subsidy will be taken away from the farm in terms of increased costs.;https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/5708
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P. PIHAMAA
K. PIETOLA
spellingShingle P. PIHAMAA
K. PIETOLA
Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland
Agricultural and Food Science
author_facet P. PIHAMAA
K. PIETOLA
author_sort P. PIHAMAA
title Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland
title_short Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland
title_full Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland
title_fullStr Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland
title_full_unstemmed Optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in Finland
title_sort optimal beef cattle management under agricultural policy reforms in finland
publisher Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland
series Agricultural and Food Science
issn 1459-6067
1795-1895
publishDate 2008-12-01
description The supply for domestic beef has been decreasing sharply since Finland joined the European Union (EU) because profitability of beef production has been low. The goal of this study is to search for optimal beef management practices that increase returns on beef production in Finland. Numerical dynamic programming (DP) is used to simultaneously optimise feeding and timing of slaughtering. The DP-algorithm is solved under alternative subsidy, output price, and silage price scenarios. At 1998 prices and subsidies, the optimal carcass weight is estimated above 250 kg. The European Agenda 2000 reform is predicted to decrease the optimal carcass weight to 200 kg, which is 50 kg lower than under the 1998 prices and subsidies. This reform will increase farmer returns significantly and its income effect depends crucially on the price of silage. The results indicate also that the reform will result in adjustment of feeding. Particularly, farmers having high silage production costs will substitute feed concentrates for roughage in the diet. A farmer is entitled to a premium subsidy of FIM 200 (e33.63), provided that the carcass weight of a culled animal exceeds 270 kg. But when the Agenda 2000 reform is fully implemented, this premium subsidy is not large enough to supply carcasses heavier than 270 kg. The results suggest that carcass weights of at least 270 kg would require a premium subsidy of FIM 400-800 (e67-134). Rearing heavy animals will significantly increase production costs and, therefore, most of the subsidy will be taken away from the farm in terms of increased costs.;
url https://journal.fi/afs/article/view/5708
work_keys_str_mv AT ppihamaa optimalbeefcattlemanagementunderagriculturalpolicyreformsinfinland
AT kpietola optimalbeefcattlemanagementunderagriculturalpolicyreformsinfinland
_version_ 1725914458380828672