Update on oral appliance therapy

Oral appliances are increasingly recommended for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and those who do not tolerate nor prefer continuous positive airway pressure. The most commonly used oral appliance advances the lower jaw during sleep, the so-called mandibular advancement device...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie Marklund, Marc J.A. Braem, Johan Verbraecken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Respiratory Society 2019-09-01
Series:European Respiratory Review
Online Access:http://err.ersjournals.com/content/28/153/190083.full
id doaj-581a452366c84f81a87e6ed1d83fe742
record_format Article
spelling doaj-581a452366c84f81a87e6ed1d83fe7422020-11-25T01:32:04ZengEuropean Respiratory SocietyEuropean Respiratory Review0905-91801600-06172019-09-012815310.1183/16000617.0083-20190083-2019Update on oral appliance therapyMarie Marklund0Marc J.A. Braem1Johan Verbraecken2 Dept of Odontology, Medical Faculty, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium LEMP, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium Oral appliances are increasingly recommended for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and those who do not tolerate nor prefer continuous positive airway pressure. The most commonly used oral appliance advances the lower jaw during sleep, the so-called mandibular advancement device (MAD). Patients seek treatment because of disturbing snoring, daytime symptoms, apnoeas that disturb sleep and the longer term consequences with regard to cardiovascular risks. MADs reduce the apnoea–hypopnoea index, although to various degrees among patients. Effects on daytime sleepiness have been observed mainly among the more severe OSA patients. Blood pressure may be reduced in MAD-treated OSA patients. There is, however, uncertainty about which patients will respond to this therapy in terms of apnoea reductions, decreased sleepiness and other symptoms, and reduced risk for future impaired health. The occurrence of side-effects also remains difficult to predict at present. The majority of sleep apnoea patients suffer from various comorbidities in terms of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes and depression. The most recent findings indicate that phenotyping of patients, considering various aspects of this multifaceted disease, will shed more light on the indications for MADs in patients with nightly sleep breathing disturbances. This review summarises the most recent knowledge about MAD treatment.http://err.ersjournals.com/content/28/153/190083.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie Marklund
Marc J.A. Braem
Johan Verbraecken
spellingShingle Marie Marklund
Marc J.A. Braem
Johan Verbraecken
Update on oral appliance therapy
European Respiratory Review
author_facet Marie Marklund
Marc J.A. Braem
Johan Verbraecken
author_sort Marie Marklund
title Update on oral appliance therapy
title_short Update on oral appliance therapy
title_full Update on oral appliance therapy
title_fullStr Update on oral appliance therapy
title_full_unstemmed Update on oral appliance therapy
title_sort update on oral appliance therapy
publisher European Respiratory Society
series European Respiratory Review
issn 0905-9180
1600-0617
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Oral appliances are increasingly recommended for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and those who do not tolerate nor prefer continuous positive airway pressure. The most commonly used oral appliance advances the lower jaw during sleep, the so-called mandibular advancement device (MAD). Patients seek treatment because of disturbing snoring, daytime symptoms, apnoeas that disturb sleep and the longer term consequences with regard to cardiovascular risks. MADs reduce the apnoea–hypopnoea index, although to various degrees among patients. Effects on daytime sleepiness have been observed mainly among the more severe OSA patients. Blood pressure may be reduced in MAD-treated OSA patients. There is, however, uncertainty about which patients will respond to this therapy in terms of apnoea reductions, decreased sleepiness and other symptoms, and reduced risk for future impaired health. The occurrence of side-effects also remains difficult to predict at present. The majority of sleep apnoea patients suffer from various comorbidities in terms of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes and depression. The most recent findings indicate that phenotyping of patients, considering various aspects of this multifaceted disease, will shed more light on the indications for MADs in patients with nightly sleep breathing disturbances. This review summarises the most recent knowledge about MAD treatment.
url http://err.ersjournals.com/content/28/153/190083.full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariemarklund updateonoralappliancetherapy
AT marcjabraem updateonoralappliancetherapy
AT johanverbraecken updateonoralappliancetherapy
_version_ 1725083495549632512