On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire

The article gives a critical review of previous views on the origin of komitats as administrative units in the Early Medieval Bulgarian State. Among the Bulgarian researchers, the opinion of their Byzantine origin prevailed, while the only Western researcher dealing with the problem, T. Wasilewski,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikolay Hrissimov
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Lodz University Press 2019-12-01
Series:Studia Ceranea
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/sceranea/article/view/6734
id doaj-57e72ceb07944856ba5c325e8a810867
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57e72ceb07944856ba5c325e8a8108672020-11-25T03:29:10ZdeuLodz University PressStudia Ceranea2084-140X2449-83782019-12-01942945310.18778/2084-140X.09.236734On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian EmpireNikolay Hrissimov0St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of Veliko Tărnovo, Faculty of History, Department of Ancient and Medieval HistoryThe article gives a critical review of previous views on the origin of komitats as administrative units in the Early Medieval Bulgarian State. Among the Bulgarian researchers, the opinion of their Byzantine origin prevailed, while the only Western researcher dealing with the problem, T. Wasilewski, advocated the thesis of their relationship with Western Europe, suggesting some of the conclusions of I. Venedikov. It is concluded that at the beginning of the 9th century, when Bulgaria expanded its territory almost doubled, its population is multiethnic and already has direct neighbors in the face of Byzantium and the Frankish state needed a new administrative division. The administrative division of the two countries is decided in two fundamentally different ways. In search of ways to solve the problem, the Byzantine themae system and the marks of the Frankish state are presented. Between komitats and the themae system the similarities are only formal, whereas the comparison with the marks proved to be much more efficient. In this case, similarities are found with regard to their location, their way of setting up, the powers and the way of appointing their governors, as well as the names and powers of the governors. The presence of komitats on the northern and western borders of the Early Medieval Bulgarian state was established, but not in the direction of Constantinople. These parts are directly subordinate to the central government, and this division of ‘inside’ and ‘out’ is characteristic of both early-medieval Bulgaria and the Frankish state of that period. It is pointed out the possibility that the Boritarkans are an intermediary between the central authority and the komitats, and on the basis of the source data the possibility is presented that they are directly subordinated to the komiti.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/sceranea/article/view/6734first bulgarian empirebyzantiumfrankish statekomitatsmarksadministrative unitscomeskomit
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikolay Hrissimov
spellingShingle Nikolay Hrissimov
On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire
Studia Ceranea
first bulgarian empire
byzantium
frankish state
komitats
marks
administrative units
comes
komit
author_facet Nikolay Hrissimov
author_sort Nikolay Hrissimov
title On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire
title_short On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire
title_full On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire
title_fullStr On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire
title_full_unstemmed On the Origins of Komitats in the First Bulgarian Empire
title_sort on the origins of komitats in the first bulgarian empire
publisher Lodz University Press
series Studia Ceranea
issn 2084-140X
2449-8378
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The article gives a critical review of previous views on the origin of komitats as administrative units in the Early Medieval Bulgarian State. Among the Bulgarian researchers, the opinion of their Byzantine origin prevailed, while the only Western researcher dealing with the problem, T. Wasilewski, advocated the thesis of their relationship with Western Europe, suggesting some of the conclusions of I. Venedikov. It is concluded that at the beginning of the 9th century, when Bulgaria expanded its territory almost doubled, its population is multiethnic and already has direct neighbors in the face of Byzantium and the Frankish state needed a new administrative division. The administrative division of the two countries is decided in two fundamentally different ways. In search of ways to solve the problem, the Byzantine themae system and the marks of the Frankish state are presented. Between komitats and the themae system the similarities are only formal, whereas the comparison with the marks proved to be much more efficient. In this case, similarities are found with regard to their location, their way of setting up, the powers and the way of appointing their governors, as well as the names and powers of the governors. The presence of komitats on the northern and western borders of the Early Medieval Bulgarian state was established, but not in the direction of Constantinople. These parts are directly subordinate to the central government, and this division of ‘inside’ and ‘out’ is characteristic of both early-medieval Bulgaria and the Frankish state of that period. It is pointed out the possibility that the Boritarkans are an intermediary between the central authority and the komitats, and on the basis of the source data the possibility is presented that they are directly subordinated to the komiti.
topic first bulgarian empire
byzantium
frankish state
komitats
marks
administrative units
comes
komit
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/sceranea/article/view/6734
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolayhrissimov ontheoriginsofkomitatsinthefirstbulgarianempire
_version_ 1724580108429164544