PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH

Background: Composite resin has been widely used because of it's great aesthetic and physico-chemical properties. Type of posterior composite resins mostly used nowadays are packable and bulk-fill composite resins. Shrinkage in composite resin resulting microleakage that could lead to pulp sens...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arlina Nurhapsari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Islam Sultan Agung 2016-07-01
Series:ODONTO: Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/odj/article/view/764
id doaj-57e71e5307bc4e40a0fe3e597bee754a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57e71e5307bc4e40a0fe3e597bee754a2020-11-25T00:09:34ZengUniversitas Islam Sultan AgungODONTO: Dental Journal2354-59922460-41192016-07-013181310.30659/odj.3.1.8-13717PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCHArlina NurhapsariBackground: Composite resin has been widely used because of it's great aesthetic and physico-chemical properties. Type of posterior composite resins mostly used nowadays are packable and bulk-fill composite resins. Shrinkage in composite resin resulting microleakage that could lead to pulp sensitivity. Dentin bonding adhesive system can help to minimalize shrinkage. There are two type of adhesive system, the total etch and self etch group. The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage between bulk-fill and packable composit resin with two different types of dentin bonding adhesive system. Method: twenty premolar teeth used as sample. The teeth were divided into four groups of 5 teeth each and Class I cavity preparations were prepared. The groups are : G1 (PC + TE), G2 (PC + SE), G3 (BC + TE), G4 (BC + SE). The specimens were thermocycled, stained with methylene blue dye, and sectioned to evaluate the dye penetration. Result: Kruskal Wallis test showed no difference among 4 groups. Meanwhile, Mann Whitney test showed significance difference between G2 - G3, and G3 - G4. Conclus/on: The study demonstrated that total etch has better sealing ability than self etch and there was no significant microleakage difference between bulkfill composite and packable composite.http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/odj/article/view/764microleakage, bulkfill composite, packable composite, total etch, self etch
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arlina Nurhapsari
spellingShingle Arlina Nurhapsari
PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH
ODONTO: Dental Journal
microleakage, bulkfill composite, packable composite, total etch, self etch
author_facet Arlina Nurhapsari
author_sort Arlina Nurhapsari
title PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH
title_short PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH
title_full PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH
title_fullStr PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH
title_full_unstemmed PERBANDINGAN KEBOCORAN TEPI ANTARA RESTORASI RESIN KOMPOSIT TIPE BULK-FILL DAN TIPE PACKABLE DENGAN PENGGUNAAN SISTEM ADHESIF TOTAL ETCH DAN SELF ETCH
title_sort perbandingan kebocoran tepi antara restorasi resin komposit tipe bulk-fill dan tipe packable dengan penggunaan sistem adhesif total etch dan self etch
publisher Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
series ODONTO: Dental Journal
issn 2354-5992
2460-4119
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Background: Composite resin has been widely used because of it's great aesthetic and physico-chemical properties. Type of posterior composite resins mostly used nowadays are packable and bulk-fill composite resins. Shrinkage in composite resin resulting microleakage that could lead to pulp sensitivity. Dentin bonding adhesive system can help to minimalize shrinkage. There are two type of adhesive system, the total etch and self etch group. The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage between bulk-fill and packable composit resin with two different types of dentin bonding adhesive system. Method: twenty premolar teeth used as sample. The teeth were divided into four groups of 5 teeth each and Class I cavity preparations were prepared. The groups are : G1 (PC + TE), G2 (PC + SE), G3 (BC + TE), G4 (BC + SE). The specimens were thermocycled, stained with methylene blue dye, and sectioned to evaluate the dye penetration. Result: Kruskal Wallis test showed no difference among 4 groups. Meanwhile, Mann Whitney test showed significance difference between G2 - G3, and G3 - G4. Conclus/on: The study demonstrated that total etch has better sealing ability than self etch and there was no significant microleakage difference between bulkfill composite and packable composite.
topic microleakage, bulkfill composite, packable composite, total etch, self etch
url http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/odj/article/view/764
work_keys_str_mv AT arlinanurhapsari perbandingankebocorantepiantararestorasiresinkomposittipebulkfilldantipepackabledenganpenggunaansistemadhesiftotaletchdanselfetch
_version_ 1725411192371937280