Statistical Measures Alone Cannot Determine Which Database (BNI, CINAHL, MEDLINE, or EMBASE) Is the Most Useful for Searching Undergraduate Nursing Topics
A Review of: Stokes, P., Foster, A., & Urquhart, C. (2009). Beyond relevance and recall: Testing new user-centred measures of database performance. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(3), 220-231. Objective – The research project sought to determine which of four databases was t...
Main Author: | Giovanna Badia |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alberta
2011-03-01
|
Series: | Evidence Based Library and Information Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/eblip/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/9561 |
Similar Items
-
Statistical Measures Alone Cannot Determine Which Database (BNI, CINAHL, MEDLINE, or EMBASE) Is the Most Useful for Searching Undergraduate Nursing Topics. A Review of: Stokes, P., Foster, A., & Urquhart, C. (2009). Beyond relevance and recall: Testing new user-centred measures of database performance. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(3), 220-231.
by: Giovanna Badia
Published: (2011-03-01) -
Evaluation of five free Medline versions
by: Ershad Sarabi.R, et al.
Published: (2002-07-01) -
Google Scholar Out-Performs Many Subscription Databases when Keyword Searching
by: Giovanna Badia
Published: (2010-09-01) -
Can database-level MEDLINE exclusion filters in Embase and CINAHL be used to remove duplicate records without loss of relevant studies in systematic reviews? An exploratory study
by: Zahra Premji, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews – are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
by: Thomas Aagaard, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)