Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?

In the literature, there is substantial evidence presented of enhancement of vegetation growth and regrowth with rainfall. There is also much research presented on the decline in rainfall with land clearance. This article deals with the well documented decline in rainfall in southwestWestern Austral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Boland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-07-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/7/2127
id doaj-57e0fe8ce5c54e1da65edcf189cb92cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57e0fe8ce5c54e1da65edcf189cb92cf2020-11-24T22:43:23ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412014-07-01672127214310.3390/w6072127w6072127Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?John Boland0Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, AustraliaIn the literature, there is substantial evidence presented of enhancement of vegetation growth and regrowth with rainfall. There is also much research presented on the decline in rainfall with land clearance. This article deals with the well documented decline in rainfall in southwestWestern Australia and discusses the literature that has been presented as to the rationale for the decline. The original view was that it was the result of climate change. More recent research points to the compounding effect of land use change. In particular, one study estimated, through simulation work with atmospheric models, that up to 50% of the decline could be attributed to land use change. For South Australia, there is an examination the pattern of rainfall decline in one particular region, using Cummins on the Eyre Peninsula as an example location. There is a statistically significant decrease in annual rainfall over time in that location. This is mirrored for the vast majority of locations studied in South Australia, most probably having the dual drivers of climate and land use change. Conversely, it is found that for two locations, Murray Bridge and Callington, southeast of Adelaide, there is marginal evidence for an increase in annual rainfall over the last two decades, during which, incidentally, Australia experienced the most severe drought in recorded history. The one feature common to these two locations is the proximity to the Monarto plateau, which lies between them. It was the site of extensive revegetation in the 1970s. It is conjectured that there could be a connection between the increase in rainfall and the revegetation, and there is evidence presented from a number of studies for such a connection, though not specifically relating to this location.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/7/2127rainfall trendsland usereforestation for water production
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Boland
spellingShingle John Boland
Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?
Water
rainfall trends
land use
reforestation for water production
author_facet John Boland
author_sort John Boland
title Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?
title_short Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?
title_full Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?
title_fullStr Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?
title_full_unstemmed Rainfall Enhances Vegetation Growth but Does the Reverse Hold?
title_sort rainfall enhances vegetation growth but does the reverse hold?
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2014-07-01
description In the literature, there is substantial evidence presented of enhancement of vegetation growth and regrowth with rainfall. There is also much research presented on the decline in rainfall with land clearance. This article deals with the well documented decline in rainfall in southwestWestern Australia and discusses the literature that has been presented as to the rationale for the decline. The original view was that it was the result of climate change. More recent research points to the compounding effect of land use change. In particular, one study estimated, through simulation work with atmospheric models, that up to 50% of the decline could be attributed to land use change. For South Australia, there is an examination the pattern of rainfall decline in one particular region, using Cummins on the Eyre Peninsula as an example location. There is a statistically significant decrease in annual rainfall over time in that location. This is mirrored for the vast majority of locations studied in South Australia, most probably having the dual drivers of climate and land use change. Conversely, it is found that for two locations, Murray Bridge and Callington, southeast of Adelaide, there is marginal evidence for an increase in annual rainfall over the last two decades, during which, incidentally, Australia experienced the most severe drought in recorded history. The one feature common to these two locations is the proximity to the Monarto plateau, which lies between them. It was the site of extensive revegetation in the 1970s. It is conjectured that there could be a connection between the increase in rainfall and the revegetation, and there is evidence presented from a number of studies for such a connection, though not specifically relating to this location.
topic rainfall trends
land use
reforestation for water production
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/7/2127
work_keys_str_mv AT johnboland rainfallenhancesvegetationgrowthbutdoesthereversehold
_version_ 1725696187266236416