Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond
There are good grounds for taking seriously Wallerstein's dictum that the world system has entered what he describes as an interregnum. By this he means two important things: First, that the world is moving between two forms of world system, from a capitalist world system to something new; Seco...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
2015-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of World-Systems Research |
Online Access: | http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/230 |
id |
doaj-5798c0944e6a4f1193813230f8b9f045 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5798c0944e6a4f1193813230f8b9f0452020-11-25T00:36:56ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of World-Systems Research1076-156X2015-08-0161196410.5195/jwsr.2000.230224Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and BeyondPeter Wilkin0Brunel University LondonThere are good grounds for taking seriously Wallerstein's dictum that the world system has entered what he describes as an interregnum. By this he means two important things: First, that the world is moving between two forms of world system, from a capitalist world system to something new; Second, that in such an interregnum questions of structure become less signi? cant than those of agency. The world system is one that has been produced, reproduced and will ultimately be transformed by human actors. The direction that it takes will be the result of the political struggles that ensue in the interregnum. In this paper I examine some of these claims in the context of a series of events that have taken place over the past decade and in the run up to the protests that occurred in December 1999 at the World Trade Organization (WTO) summit in Seattle. In so doing I hope to put some empirical ?esh on the bones of the idea that Wallerstein has suggestively offered us.http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/230 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Wilkin |
spellingShingle |
Peter Wilkin Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond Journal of World-Systems Research |
author_facet |
Peter Wilkin |
author_sort |
Peter Wilkin |
title |
Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond |
title_short |
Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond |
title_full |
Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond |
title_fullStr |
Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond |
title_full_unstemmed |
Solidarity in a Global AgeSeattle and Beyond |
title_sort |
solidarity in a global ageseattle and beyond |
publisher |
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh |
series |
Journal of World-Systems Research |
issn |
1076-156X |
publishDate |
2015-08-01 |
description |
There are good grounds for taking seriously Wallerstein's dictum that the world system has entered what he describes as an interregnum. By this he means two important things: First, that the world is moving between two forms of world system, from a capitalist world system to something new; Second, that in such an interregnum questions of structure become less signi? cant than those of agency. The world system is one that has been produced, reproduced and will ultimately be transformed by human actors. The direction that it takes will be the result of the political struggles that ensue in the interregnum. In this paper I examine some of these claims in the context of a series of events that have taken place over the past decade and in the run up to the protests that occurred in December 1999 at the World Trade Organization (WTO) summit in Seattle. In so doing I hope to put some empirical ?esh on the bones of the idea that Wallerstein has suggestively offered us. |
url |
http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/230 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterwilkin solidarityinaglobalageseattleandbeyond |
_version_ |
1725303427838246912 |