Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series

Purpose: Although surgical repair of distal biceps tendon rupture improves functional outcomes compared with nonsurgical treatments, the choice of operative technique remains a matter of preference. This study retrospectively examined outcomes from a repair technique using a volar distal biceps rein...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan A. Monaco, MD, Alexander J. Duke, BS, Meghan W. Richardson, MD, David E. Komatsu, PhD, Edward D. Wang, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514118300318
id doaj-578eb280d78a428abaeeab756f8a2271
record_format Article
spelling doaj-578eb280d78a428abaeeab756f8a22712020-11-25T02:15:30ZengElsevierJournal of Hand Surgery Global Online2589-51412019-07-0113178184Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case SeriesNathan A. Monaco, MD0Alexander J. Duke, BS1Meghan W. Richardson, MD2David E. Komatsu, PhD3Edward D. Wang, MD4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NYDepartment of Orthopeadic Surgery, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NYDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NYDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NYDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY; Corresponding author: Edward D. Wang, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HSC-T18-080, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181.Purpose: Although surgical repair of distal biceps tendon rupture improves functional outcomes compared with nonsurgical treatments, the choice of operative technique remains a matter of preference. This study retrospectively examined outcomes from a repair technique using a volar distal biceps reinsertion secured with a unicortical intramedullary button in the proximal radial tuberosity to determine its safety and functional outcomes. Methods: A single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon treated 27 men, average age 48 years (range, 25–66 years), between 2012 and 2016. Patient-reported outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) satisfaction scores and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Average patient follow-up was 24 months. Results: This series had an overall complication rate of 39.3% (11 of 28): 9 lateral antebrachial cutaneous neuropraxias, one radial sensory nerve irritation, and one superficial infection. No complications of peripheral nerve injury, proximal radioulnar synostosis, or rerupture were observed. Results (mean ± SD) demonstrated low disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score = 2.9 ± 5.3), high satisfaction (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score = 9.3 ± 1.4), and acceptable performance (Mayo Elbow Performance Score = 97.7 ± 6.3). Subcategory analysis identified a correlation between time to surgery and complications. Disability scores were higher in patients with workers’ compensation claims versus private insurance (mean, 11.0 vs 1.1). Conclusions: Further trials are required to compare the results and complication rates of this unicortical intramedullary button procedure with other established methods. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV. Key words: distal biceps repair, single incision, unicortical button, volar incisionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514118300318
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan A. Monaco, MD
Alexander J. Duke, BS
Meghan W. Richardson, MD
David E. Komatsu, PhD
Edward D. Wang, MD
spellingShingle Nathan A. Monaco, MD
Alexander J. Duke, BS
Meghan W. Richardson, MD
David E. Komatsu, PhD
Edward D. Wang, MD
Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
author_facet Nathan A. Monaco, MD
Alexander J. Duke, BS
Meghan W. Richardson, MD
David E. Komatsu, PhD
Edward D. Wang, MD
author_sort Nathan A. Monaco, MD
title Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series
title_short Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series
title_full Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series
title_fullStr Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Distal Biceps Repair Using a Unicortical Intramedullary Button Technique: A Case Series
title_sort distal biceps repair using a unicortical intramedullary button technique: a case series
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
issn 2589-5141
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Purpose: Although surgical repair of distal biceps tendon rupture improves functional outcomes compared with nonsurgical treatments, the choice of operative technique remains a matter of preference. This study retrospectively examined outcomes from a repair technique using a volar distal biceps reinsertion secured with a unicortical intramedullary button in the proximal radial tuberosity to determine its safety and functional outcomes. Methods: A single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon treated 27 men, average age 48 years (range, 25–66 years), between 2012 and 2016. Patient-reported outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) satisfaction scores and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Average patient follow-up was 24 months. Results: This series had an overall complication rate of 39.3% (11 of 28): 9 lateral antebrachial cutaneous neuropraxias, one radial sensory nerve irritation, and one superficial infection. No complications of peripheral nerve injury, proximal radioulnar synostosis, or rerupture were observed. Results (mean ± SD) demonstrated low disability (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score = 2.9 ± 5.3), high satisfaction (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score = 9.3 ± 1.4), and acceptable performance (Mayo Elbow Performance Score = 97.7 ± 6.3). Subcategory analysis identified a correlation between time to surgery and complications. Disability scores were higher in patients with workers’ compensation claims versus private insurance (mean, 11.0 vs 1.1). Conclusions: Further trials are required to compare the results and complication rates of this unicortical intramedullary button procedure with other established methods. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV. Key words: distal biceps repair, single incision, unicortical button, volar incision
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514118300318
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanamonacomd distalbicepsrepairusingaunicorticalintramedullarybuttontechniqueacaseseries
AT alexanderjdukebs distalbicepsrepairusingaunicorticalintramedullarybuttontechniqueacaseseries
AT meghanwrichardsonmd distalbicepsrepairusingaunicorticalintramedullarybuttontechniqueacaseseries
AT davidekomatsuphd distalbicepsrepairusingaunicorticalintramedullarybuttontechniqueacaseseries
AT edwarddwangmd distalbicepsrepairusingaunicorticalintramedullarybuttontechniqueacaseseries
_version_ 1724895939903094784