Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference

The so-called hotspots—identification and registration centres on the Aegean Islands in Greece and in Italy—are not only sites of remote detention, European intervention or differential inclusion, but also logistical set-ups, where data is generated and spread across state institutions. Such socio-t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Silvan Pollozek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-11-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3354
id doaj-577da02f555b4794aab490d48131c0b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-577da02f555b4794aab490d48131c0b72020-11-25T04:10:51ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032020-11-018415716810.17645/si.v8i4.33541729Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and InterferenceSilvan Pollozek0Digital Media Lab, Munich Centre for Technology in Society, Technical University of Munich, GermanyThe so-called hotspots—identification and registration centres on the Aegean Islands in Greece and in Italy—are not only sites of remote detention, European intervention or differential inclusion, but also logistical set-ups, where data is generated and spread across state institutions. Such socio-technical assemblages are hard to research not only because of state actors’ desire to keep things secret but also because of methodological issues. How does one disentangle their extensive, complex and rhizomatic nature? Which trajectories does one follow and which actors and voices does one assemble? Following recent work in the realm of STS, methods are understood as (b)ordering devices, which performatively enact an ordered world and produce accounts of the social, including some realities while excluding others. This article considers mapping a well-suited method for studying widespread socio-technical assemblages, but only if it is handled with caution. Based on an empirical inquiry into the Moria hotspot and following a praxeographic research approach, different types of small maps are developed that enfold complexity by being attentive to situatedness, symmetry, multi-sitedness and multiplicity. Furthermore, it emphasizes an on-going process of reflexive inversion of the mapping process that makes the crafted accounts contestable and its boundaries and blind spots visible. Finally, the article discusses how mappings can be used not only as research but also as a political device that contributes to the work of other collectives beyond the scientific production of truth.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3354issue mapsmethods as ordering devicemoria hotspotpraxeographysituational mapssocial world mapstrajectory maps
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Silvan Pollozek
spellingShingle Silvan Pollozek
Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference
Social Inclusion
issue maps
methods as ordering device
moria hotspot
praxeography
situational maps
social world maps
trajectory maps
author_facet Silvan Pollozek
author_sort Silvan Pollozek
title Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference
title_short Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference
title_full Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference
title_fullStr Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference
title_full_unstemmed Mapping European Border Control: On Small Maps, Reflexive Inversion and Interference
title_sort mapping european border control: on small maps, reflexive inversion and interference
publisher Cogitatio
series Social Inclusion
issn 2183-2803
publishDate 2020-11-01
description The so-called hotspots—identification and registration centres on the Aegean Islands in Greece and in Italy—are not only sites of remote detention, European intervention or differential inclusion, but also logistical set-ups, where data is generated and spread across state institutions. Such socio-technical assemblages are hard to research not only because of state actors’ desire to keep things secret but also because of methodological issues. How does one disentangle their extensive, complex and rhizomatic nature? Which trajectories does one follow and which actors and voices does one assemble? Following recent work in the realm of STS, methods are understood as (b)ordering devices, which performatively enact an ordered world and produce accounts of the social, including some realities while excluding others. This article considers mapping a well-suited method for studying widespread socio-technical assemblages, but only if it is handled with caution. Based on an empirical inquiry into the Moria hotspot and following a praxeographic research approach, different types of small maps are developed that enfold complexity by being attentive to situatedness, symmetry, multi-sitedness and multiplicity. Furthermore, it emphasizes an on-going process of reflexive inversion of the mapping process that makes the crafted accounts contestable and its boundaries and blind spots visible. Finally, the article discusses how mappings can be used not only as research but also as a political device that contributes to the work of other collectives beyond the scientific production of truth.
topic issue maps
methods as ordering device
moria hotspot
praxeography
situational maps
social world maps
trajectory maps
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/3354
work_keys_str_mv AT silvanpollozek mappingeuropeanbordercontrolonsmallmapsreflexiveinversionandinterference
_version_ 1724418881914667008