The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.

Factors beyond a person's control, such as demographic characteristics at birth, often influence the availability of rewards an individual can expect for their efforts. We know surprisingly little how such differences in opportunities impact human motivation. To test this, we designed a study i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filip Gesiarz, Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Tali Sharot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237914
id doaj-57686b0f8c4d45f0aeec5a0235382ecb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-57686b0f8c4d45f0aeec5a0235382ecb2021-03-03T22:03:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159e023791410.1371/journal.pone.0237914The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.Filip GesiarzJan-Emmanuel De NeveTali SharotFactors beyond a person's control, such as demographic characteristics at birth, often influence the availability of rewards an individual can expect for their efforts. We know surprisingly little how such differences in opportunities impact human motivation. To test this, we designed a study in which we arbitrarily varied the reward offered to each participant in a group for performing the same task. Participants then had to decide whether or not they were willing to exert effort to receive their reward. Across three experiments, we found that the unequal distribution of offers reduced participants' motivation to pursue rewards even when their relative position in the distribution was high, and despite the decision being of no benefit to others and reducing the reward for oneself. Participants' feelings partially mediated this relationship. In particular, a large disparity in rewards was associated with greater unhappiness, which was associated with lower willingness to work-even when controlling for absolute reward and its relative value, both of which also affected decisions to work. A model that incorporated a person's relative position and unfairness of rewards in the group fit better to the data than other popular models describing the effects of inequality. Our findings suggest opportunity-gaps can trigger psychological dynamics that hurt productivity and well-being of all involved.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237914
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Filip Gesiarz
Jan-Emmanuel De Neve
Tali Sharot
spellingShingle Filip Gesiarz
Jan-Emmanuel De Neve
Tali Sharot
The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Filip Gesiarz
Jan-Emmanuel De Neve
Tali Sharot
author_sort Filip Gesiarz
title The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
title_short The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
title_full The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
title_fullStr The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
title_full_unstemmed The motivational cost of inequality: Opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
title_sort motivational cost of inequality: opportunity gaps reduce the willingness to work.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Factors beyond a person's control, such as demographic characteristics at birth, often influence the availability of rewards an individual can expect for their efforts. We know surprisingly little how such differences in opportunities impact human motivation. To test this, we designed a study in which we arbitrarily varied the reward offered to each participant in a group for performing the same task. Participants then had to decide whether or not they were willing to exert effort to receive their reward. Across three experiments, we found that the unequal distribution of offers reduced participants' motivation to pursue rewards even when their relative position in the distribution was high, and despite the decision being of no benefit to others and reducing the reward for oneself. Participants' feelings partially mediated this relationship. In particular, a large disparity in rewards was associated with greater unhappiness, which was associated with lower willingness to work-even when controlling for absolute reward and its relative value, both of which also affected decisions to work. A model that incorporated a person's relative position and unfairness of rewards in the group fit better to the data than other popular models describing the effects of inequality. Our findings suggest opportunity-gaps can trigger psychological dynamics that hurt productivity and well-being of all involved.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237914
work_keys_str_mv AT filipgesiarz themotivationalcostofinequalityopportunitygapsreducethewillingnesstowork
AT janemmanueldeneve themotivationalcostofinequalityopportunitygapsreducethewillingnesstowork
AT talisharot themotivationalcostofinequalityopportunitygapsreducethewillingnesstowork
AT filipgesiarz motivationalcostofinequalityopportunitygapsreducethewillingnesstowork
AT janemmanueldeneve motivationalcostofinequalityopportunitygapsreducethewillingnesstowork
AT talisharot motivationalcostofinequalityopportunitygapsreducethewillingnesstowork
_version_ 1714813679736717312