Visual Feedback and Postural Control in Multiple Sclerosis

• Main Authors: Hernan Inojosa, Dirk Schriefer, Katrin Trentzsch, Antonia Klöditz, Tjalf Ziemssen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
• Series: Journal of Clinical Medicine
• Subjects: Multiple sclerosis; balance; postural control; visual feedback; static posturography; somatosensory impairment
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/5/1291

As people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) manifest heterogeneous demyelinating lesions that could affect somatosensory or vestibular ways, visual stimulus as feedback could be especially relevant to achieve postural control. This has clinical importance for the development of preventive measures and rehabilitation therapies in order to avoid falls and accidents in this group. In our study, we objectively evaluated the influence of visual feedback on the stabilization of balance in pwMS versus healthy controls (HC) and its potential utility in clinical evaluation. Static posturography tests were performed in 99 pwMS and 30 HC. Subjects stood on a force platform with open and closed eyes. During this procedure, three balance parameters were obtained for both vision conditions: average sway, average speed, and average speed of sway. Neurostatus-Expanded Disease Disability Score (EDSS) and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) were performed in parallel as well. A two-way mixed repeated measures ANCOVA, controlling for sex and age, was performed to evaluate the effect of vision, MS diagnosis, and the interaction of both in static posturography parameters. The difference between both closed and open eyes conditions was calculated for each parameter and further analyzed according to MS-relevant clinical variables. The magnitude of the vision effect differed between pwMS and HC as a significant interaction between the vision and the MS diagnosis in the delineated area (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and average speed of sway (<i>p</i> = 0.001) was seen. These parameters had a greater increase in pwMS than in HC after closing eyes. For the average sway, a significant main effect of vision was present (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Additionally, the differences obtained between open and closed eyes conditions assessed with the delineated area and average speed of sway were moderately correlated to the assessed clinical tests EDSS (<i>r</i> = 0.405 and <i>r</i> = 0.329, respectively) and the MSFC (<i>r</i> = −0.385 and <i>r</i> = −0.259, respectively). In our study, pwMS were more dependent of visual feedback than HC to maintain postural control. This easy and short evaluation by static posturography could support the development of targeted preventive measures and interventions in pwMS.