Improving PM<sub>2.5</sub> Forecasting and Emission Estimation Based on the Bayesian Optimization Method and the Coupled FLEXPART-WRF Model

In this study, we evaluated estimates and predictions of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> (fine particulate matter) concentrations and emissions in Xuzhou, China, using a coupled Lagrangian particle dispersion modeling system (FLEXPART-WRF). A Bayesian inversion method was used in FLEXPART-WRF to im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lifeng Guo, Baozhang Chen, Huifang Zhang, Guang Xu, Lijiang Lu, Xiaofeng Lin, Yawen Kong, Fei Wang, Yanpeng Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-11-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/9/11/428
Description
Summary:In this study, we evaluated estimates and predictions of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> (fine particulate matter) concentrations and emissions in Xuzhou, China, using a coupled Lagrangian particle dispersion modeling system (FLEXPART-WRF). A Bayesian inversion method was used in FLEXPART-WRF to improve the emission calculation and mixing ratio estimation for PM<sub>2.5</sub>. We first examined the inversion modeling performance by comparing the model predictions with PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration observations from four stations in Xuzhou. The linear correlation analysis between the predicted PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and the observations shows that our inversion forecast system is much better than the system before calibration (with correlation coefficients of R = 0.639 vs. 0.459, respectively, and root mean square errors of RMSE = 7.407 vs. 9.805 &#181;g/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively). We also estimated the monthly average emission flux in Xuzhou to be 4188.26 Mg/month, which is much higher (by ~10.12%) than the emission flux predicted by the multiscale emission inventory data (MEIC) (3803.5 Mg/month). In addition, the monthly average emission flux shows obvious seasonal variation, with the lowest PM<sub>2.5</sub> flux in summer and the highest flux in winter. This pattern is mainly due to the additional heating fuels used in the cold season, resulting in many fine particulates in the atmosphere. Although the inversion and forecast results were improved to some extent, the inversion system can be improved further, e.g., by increasing the number of observation values and improving the accuracy of the a priori emission values. Further research and analysis are recommended to help improve the forecast precision of real-time PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations and the corresponding monthly emission fluxes.
ISSN:2073-4433