To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Outcomes from GPs' consultations have been measured mainly with disease specific measures and with patient questionnaires about health, satisfaction, enablement and quality. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' concept...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andersson Sven-Olof, Andén Annika, Rudebeck Carl-Edvard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-01-01
Series:BMC Family Practice
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/4
id doaj-572dae2b538b4135b8629a1d7506d62c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-572dae2b538b4135b8629a1d7506d62c2020-11-25T03:53:47ZengBMCBMC Family Practice1471-22962009-01-01101410.1186/1471-2296-10-4To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic studyAndersson Sven-OlofAndén AnnikaRudebeck Carl-Edvard<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Outcomes from GPs' consultations have been measured mainly with disease specific measures and with patient questionnaires about health, satisfaction, enablement and quality. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' conceptions of consultation outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Interviews with 17 GPs in groups and individually about consultation outcomes from recently performed consultations were analysed with a phenomenographic research approach.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The GPs conceived outcomes in four ways: patient outcomes, GPs' self-evaluation, relationship building and change of surgery routines.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Patient outcomes, as conceived by the GPs, were generally congruent with those that had been taken up in outcome studies. Relationship building and change of surgery routines were outcomes in preparation for consultations to come. GPs made self-assessments related to internalized norms, grounded on a perceived collegial professional consensus. Considerations of such different aspects of outcomes can inspire professional development.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andersson Sven-Olof
Andén Annika
Rudebeck Carl-Edvard
spellingShingle Andersson Sven-Olof
Andén Annika
Rudebeck Carl-Edvard
To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study
BMC Family Practice
author_facet Andersson Sven-Olof
Andén Annika
Rudebeck Carl-Edvard
author_sort Andersson Sven-Olof
title To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study
title_short To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study
title_full To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study
title_fullStr To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study
title_full_unstemmed To make a difference – how GPs conceive consultation outcomes. A phenomenographic study
title_sort to make a difference – how gps conceive consultation outcomes. a phenomenographic study
publisher BMC
series BMC Family Practice
issn 1471-2296
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Outcomes from GPs' consultations have been measured mainly with disease specific measures and with patient questionnaires about health, satisfaction, enablement and quality. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' conceptions of consultation outcomes.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Interviews with 17 GPs in groups and individually about consultation outcomes from recently performed consultations were analysed with a phenomenographic research approach.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The GPs conceived outcomes in four ways: patient outcomes, GPs' self-evaluation, relationship building and change of surgery routines.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Patient outcomes, as conceived by the GPs, were generally congruent with those that had been taken up in outcome studies. Relationship building and change of surgery routines were outcomes in preparation for consultations to come. GPs made self-assessments related to internalized norms, grounded on a perceived collegial professional consensus. Considerations of such different aspects of outcomes can inspire professional development.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/10/4
work_keys_str_mv AT anderssonsvenolof tomakeadifferencehowgpsconceiveconsultationoutcomesaphenomenographicstudy
AT andenannika tomakeadifferencehowgpsconceiveconsultationoutcomesaphenomenographicstudy
AT rudebeckcarledvard tomakeadifferencehowgpsconceiveconsultationoutcomesaphenomenographicstudy
_version_ 1724476656873111552