Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre

The aim of this article is to examine the way in which knowledge-power is exercised in contemporary controversies in healthcare, and what this flexing of discursive muscles shows about the nature of secularity and its relationship to religion. The discussion is focused on two controversial issues at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kim Knott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Donner Institute 2006-01-01
Series:Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67307
id doaj-572d4548b2cb40338dab7821e600a2f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-572d4548b2cb40338dab7821e600a2f62020-11-24T23:55:24ZengDonner InstituteScripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis0582-32262343-49372006-01-011910.30674/scripta.67307Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centreKim Knott0University of LeedsThe aim of this article is to examine the way in which knowledge-power is exercised in contemporary controversies in healthcare, and what this flexing of discursive muscles shows about the nature of secularity and its relationship to religion. The discussion is focused on two controversial issues at the heart of general medical practice in the UK: the doctor–­patient relationship and complementary and alternative medicine. As will become clear, participation in these debates is not restricted to doctors alone, but increasingly to government departments, professional medical and scientific bodies, therapists beyond the medical mainstream, and patients themselves. What is interesting for scholars of religion is the way in which the debates (which are not confined only to discourse, but are also reflected in physical and social spaces) reveal deep-seated but dynamic values. The debates themselves, and many of the values and opinions expressed in association with them, are ostensibly ‘secular’, but, as we shall see, ‘religion’ has an interesting place within them. It variously enters the scene as a crit­ical tool, the butt of jokes, the enemy or a potentially fruitful partner (particularly in its nascent guise as ‘spirituality’). The author suggests that there are two important outcomes of this examination: first, the opening up of a secular organisation and exposure of the heterogeneity of value and knowledge positions within it, and, secondly, the recognition that methodological tools from within the study of religions (in this case a spatial analysis for locating religion) can be put to use in such an examination, in pursuit of a fuller understanding of secularity.https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67307Power (Religion)HealthHealth careMedical careAlternative medicineHolistic medicine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kim Knott
spellingShingle Kim Knott
Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre
Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis
Power (Religion)
Health
Health care
Medical care
Alternative medicine
Holistic medicine
author_facet Kim Knott
author_sort Kim Knott
title Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre
title_short Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre
title_full Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre
title_fullStr Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre
title_full_unstemmed Religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an English medical centre
title_sort religion, values and knowledge-power in contemporary secular spaces: the case of an english medical centre
publisher Donner Institute
series Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis
issn 0582-3226
2343-4937
publishDate 2006-01-01
description The aim of this article is to examine the way in which knowledge-power is exercised in contemporary controversies in healthcare, and what this flexing of discursive muscles shows about the nature of secularity and its relationship to religion. The discussion is focused on two controversial issues at the heart of general medical practice in the UK: the doctor–­patient relationship and complementary and alternative medicine. As will become clear, participation in these debates is not restricted to doctors alone, but increasingly to government departments, professional medical and scientific bodies, therapists beyond the medical mainstream, and patients themselves. What is interesting for scholars of religion is the way in which the debates (which are not confined only to discourse, but are also reflected in physical and social spaces) reveal deep-seated but dynamic values. The debates themselves, and many of the values and opinions expressed in association with them, are ostensibly ‘secular’, but, as we shall see, ‘religion’ has an interesting place within them. It variously enters the scene as a crit­ical tool, the butt of jokes, the enemy or a potentially fruitful partner (particularly in its nascent guise as ‘spirituality’). The author suggests that there are two important outcomes of this examination: first, the opening up of a secular organisation and exposure of the heterogeneity of value and knowledge positions within it, and, secondly, the recognition that methodological tools from within the study of religions (in this case a spatial analysis for locating religion) can be put to use in such an examination, in pursuit of a fuller understanding of secularity.
topic Power (Religion)
Health
Health care
Medical care
Alternative medicine
Holistic medicine
url https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67307
work_keys_str_mv AT kimknott religionvaluesandknowledgepowerincontemporarysecularspacesthecaseofanenglishmedicalcentre
_version_ 1725462704432349184