JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING

This study analyses defamation via social media towards Flaurence Saulina Sihombing case. The study raises the elements of contempt in Law Number 11 of 2008 which was converted into Law Number 19 of 2016 con Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) and compare it with the humiliation under the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rosiana Puspitasari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret 2017-12-01
Series:Yustisia
Online Access:https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/view/17074
id doaj-5726718d19e4410fac62a8085f46584b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5726718d19e4410fac62a8085f46584b2020-11-25T00:37:03ZengFaculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas MaretYustisia0852-09412549-09072017-12-016363764810.20961/yustisia.v6i3.1707413722JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBINGRosiana Puspitasari0Faculty of Law, Universitas Proklamasi 45 YogyakartaThis study analyses defamation via social media towards Flaurence Saulina Sihombing case. The study raises the elements of contempt in Law Number 11 of 2008 which was converted into Law Number 19 of 2016 con Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) and compare it with the humiliation under the Criminal Code. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the prosecution on Florence Saulina Sihombing meet the elements of contempt in accordance with the prohibited stipulation under Article 27 paragraph (3) Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research using normative juridical approach. The source of the data is secondary data source that the data obtained from the literature by studying three legal materials, namely: primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials that will be classified and systematized. The conclusion shows that the case Flaurence Saulina Sihombing meet a subjective element in the form of intentionally actions. This actions undertaken by Florence met the element strike action. The object in the form of honour based on Article 27 Law Number 11 of 2008 which was converted into Law Number 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT). The writer tends to confirmly agree with the Yogyakarta District Court via Decision Number 382/Pid.B/2014/PN Yyk of 2015.https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/view/17074
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosiana Puspitasari
spellingShingle Rosiana Puspitasari
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING
Yustisia
author_facet Rosiana Puspitasari
author_sort Rosiana Puspitasari
title JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING
title_short JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING
title_full JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING
title_fullStr JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL DEFAMATION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION AND TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF FLOURENCE SAULINA SIHOMBING
title_sort judicial review of criminal defamation according to the law of electronic information and transaction: a case study of flourence saulina sihombing
publisher Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret
series Yustisia
issn 0852-0941
2549-0907
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This study analyses defamation via social media towards Flaurence Saulina Sihombing case. The study raises the elements of contempt in Law Number 11 of 2008 which was converted into Law Number 19 of 2016 con Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) and compare it with the humiliation under the Criminal Code. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the prosecution on Florence Saulina Sihombing meet the elements of contempt in accordance with the prohibited stipulation under Article 27 paragraph (3) Electronic Information and Transactions Law. This research using normative juridical approach. The source of the data is secondary data source that the data obtained from the literature by studying three legal materials, namely: primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials that will be classified and systematized. The conclusion shows that the case Flaurence Saulina Sihombing meet a subjective element in the form of intentionally actions. This actions undertaken by Florence met the element strike action. The object in the form of honour based on Article 27 Law Number 11 of 2008 which was converted into Law Number 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT). The writer tends to confirmly agree with the Yogyakarta District Court via Decision Number 382/Pid.B/2014/PN Yyk of 2015.
url https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/view/17074
work_keys_str_mv AT rosianapuspitasari judicialreviewofcriminaldefamationaccordingtothelawofelectronicinformationandtransactionacasestudyofflourencesaulinasihombing
_version_ 1725302790318718976