Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment

The aim of this study was to analyze by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) possible differences in periimplant microbiota of patients without significant systemic diseases versus patients affected by non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), both treated with dental implants with the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. Bignozzi, G. Ciobanu, A. Quaranta, G. Pompa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2013-09-01
Series:European Journal of Inflammation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727X1301100324
id doaj-572069ae637d43ab9478ccfa2c54f517
record_format Article
spelling doaj-572069ae637d43ab9478ccfa2c54f5172020-11-25T03:15:02ZengSAGE PublishingEuropean Journal of Inflammation1721-727X2013-09-011110.1177/1721727X1301100324Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological AssessmentI. Bignozzi0G. Ciobanu1A. Quaranta2G. Pompa3 Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Prosthodontics Unit, “Sapienza”, University of Rome, Rome, Italy Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Prosthodontics Unit, “Sapienza”, University of Rome, Rome, Italy Department of Clinical and Odontostomatological Sciences, Periodontics Unit, Polytechnic University of the Marche, Ancona, Italy Department of Odontostomatological and Maxillofacial Sciences, Prosthodontics Unit, “Sapienza”, University of Rome, Rome, ItalyThe aim of this study was to analyze by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) possible differences in periimplant microbiota of patients without significant systemic diseases versus patients affected by non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), both treated with dental implants with the same implant-abutment system. Patients suffering from NIDDM, and those with no history of major systemic diseases, treated with dental implants at the Prosthodontics Operative Unit of “Sapienza” University of Rome in the period February 2009 - March 2010 were considered. Clinical parameters as well as microbiological profile were evaluated for each implant site at 3, 6,12, and 24 month follow-up. Crevicular fluid was collected for microbial sampling and analyzed by Real-Time PCR in order to identify the possible presence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Prevotella intermedia . Eight patients suffering from NIDDM and 22 with no history of major systemic diseases were included in the present investigation, each having received one to three dental implants. All the implants had been loaded 3 months after surgery, and the average follow-up after implant placement was 26.37±3.86. Clinical parameters showed no noticeable difference between the two groups, except for the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) that showed significantly lower values in NIDDM patients. A slightly higher amount of the considered pathogenic bacteria were retrieved in samples collected from patients with NIDDM (7.38×105) in comparison with those of healthy subjects (6.78×10 5 ), though the differences were below statistical significance. Within the limitations of the present study, a slight correlation was empirically detected between gene expression profiles of microbial populations and history of NIDDM, which however remained below the statistical significance. Further well-designed clinical studies may be useful to conclusively clarify the impact of subgingival microflora on the increased susceptibility of diabetic patients to periimplantitis.https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727X1301100324
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author I. Bignozzi
G. Ciobanu
A. Quaranta
G. Pompa
spellingShingle I. Bignozzi
G. Ciobanu
A. Quaranta
G. Pompa
Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment
European Journal of Inflammation
author_facet I. Bignozzi
G. Ciobanu
A. Quaranta
G. Pompa
author_sort I. Bignozzi
title Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment
title_short Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment
title_full Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment
title_fullStr Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Dental Implant Sites in Healthy versus Diabetic Subjects: A Two-Year Clinical and Bacteriological Assessment
title_sort dental implant sites in healthy versus diabetic subjects: a two-year clinical and bacteriological assessment
publisher SAGE Publishing
series European Journal of Inflammation
issn 1721-727X
publishDate 2013-09-01
description The aim of this study was to analyze by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) possible differences in periimplant microbiota of patients without significant systemic diseases versus patients affected by non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), both treated with dental implants with the same implant-abutment system. Patients suffering from NIDDM, and those with no history of major systemic diseases, treated with dental implants at the Prosthodontics Operative Unit of “Sapienza” University of Rome in the period February 2009 - March 2010 were considered. Clinical parameters as well as microbiological profile were evaluated for each implant site at 3, 6,12, and 24 month follow-up. Crevicular fluid was collected for microbial sampling and analyzed by Real-Time PCR in order to identify the possible presence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Prevotella intermedia . Eight patients suffering from NIDDM and 22 with no history of major systemic diseases were included in the present investigation, each having received one to three dental implants. All the implants had been loaded 3 months after surgery, and the average follow-up after implant placement was 26.37±3.86. Clinical parameters showed no noticeable difference between the two groups, except for the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) that showed significantly lower values in NIDDM patients. A slightly higher amount of the considered pathogenic bacteria were retrieved in samples collected from patients with NIDDM (7.38×105) in comparison with those of healthy subjects (6.78×10 5 ), though the differences were below statistical significance. Within the limitations of the present study, a slight correlation was empirically detected between gene expression profiles of microbial populations and history of NIDDM, which however remained below the statistical significance. Further well-designed clinical studies may be useful to conclusively clarify the impact of subgingival microflora on the increased susceptibility of diabetic patients to periimplantitis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727X1301100324
work_keys_str_mv AT ibignozzi dentalimplantsitesinhealthyversusdiabeticsubjectsatwoyearclinicalandbacteriologicalassessment
AT gciobanu dentalimplantsitesinhealthyversusdiabeticsubjectsatwoyearclinicalandbacteriologicalassessment
AT aquaranta dentalimplantsitesinhealthyversusdiabeticsubjectsatwoyearclinicalandbacteriologicalassessment
AT gpompa dentalimplantsitesinhealthyversusdiabeticsubjectsatwoyearclinicalandbacteriologicalassessment
_version_ 1724640984266964992