Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School

The article describes the results of the case study “Implementation of the Peer Instruction method into education in the Czech Republic”, trying to answer one main question: “How is the Peer Instruction method implemented into physics teaching at upper secondary Czech school?”. The data was collecte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jana Šestáková
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2016-12-01
Series:Scientia in Educatione
Online Access:https://ojs.cuni.cz/scied/article/view/298
id doaj-570ddeb9d3d74e06bff3ff8da0e5987f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-570ddeb9d3d74e06bff3ff8da0e5987f2021-02-18T20:08:02ZcesKarolinum PressScientia in Educatione1804-71062016-12-017210.14712/18047106.298Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary SchoolJana Šestáková0Univerzita Karlova v PrazeThe article describes the results of the case study “Implementation of the Peer Instruction method into education in the Czech Republic”, trying to answer one main question: “How is the Peer Instruction method implemented into physics teaching at upper secondary Czech school?”. The data was collected through interviews with the teacher, lesson observation and questionnaires for the teacher and students. The teacher involved in the study had been interested in the method since 2009. The research findings resulting from lesson observation and students’ opinions are from the 2014/2015 school year, when the method was implemented with students aged 17–18 years in three physics classes taught at an upper secondary school, with the respective numbers of students being 28, 16 and 13. The research generated the following conclusions, among other things: (1) the method should ideally be used immediately after a presentation of a new topic, therefore e.g. once a month, (2) a maximum of two ConcepTest questions should be used within one 45-minute lesson, and (3) students’ responses should be collected by means of ï¬ashcards rather than by an electronic voting system. The teacher starting with the method expected that ConcepTest questions would be simple for students and the work pace would be faster. She tried to hasten the work and therefore sometimes did not give students enough time to think about their responses, occasionally even failing to provide the option of a second answer. Nevertheless, the participating students gave positive feedback on this method, strongly indicating that that they had learned more while using this method. They admitted that using ï¬ashcards during the first answering was a strong incentive that boosted their motivation towards thinking about the answers. This article is intended for people interested in the Peer Instruction method, teachers and researchers in active learning.https://ojs.cuni.cz/scied/article/view/298
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jana Šestáková
spellingShingle Jana Šestáková
Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
Scientia in Educatione
author_facet Jana Šestáková
author_sort Jana Šestáková
title Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
title_short Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
title_full Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
title_fullStr Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
title_full_unstemmed Case Study of Using Peer Instruction at Upper Secondary School
title_sort case study of using peer instruction at upper secondary school
publisher Karolinum Press
series Scientia in Educatione
issn 1804-7106
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The article describes the results of the case study “Implementation of the Peer Instruction method into education in the Czech Republic”, trying to answer one main question: “How is the Peer Instruction method implemented into physics teaching at upper secondary Czech school?”. The data was collected through interviews with the teacher, lesson observation and questionnaires for the teacher and students. The teacher involved in the study had been interested in the method since 2009. The research findings resulting from lesson observation and students’ opinions are from the 2014/2015 school year, when the method was implemented with students aged 17–18 years in three physics classes taught at an upper secondary school, with the respective numbers of students being 28, 16 and 13. The research generated the following conclusions, among other things: (1) the method should ideally be used immediately after a presentation of a new topic, therefore e.g. once a month, (2) a maximum of two ConcepTest questions should be used within one 45-minute lesson, and (3) students’ responses should be collected by means of ï¬ashcards rather than by an electronic voting system. The teacher starting with the method expected that ConcepTest questions would be simple for students and the work pace would be faster. She tried to hasten the work and therefore sometimes did not give students enough time to think about their responses, occasionally even failing to provide the option of a second answer. Nevertheless, the participating students gave positive feedback on this method, strongly indicating that that they had learned more while using this method. They admitted that using ï¬ashcards during the first answering was a strong incentive that boosted their motivation towards thinking about the answers. This article is intended for people interested in the Peer Instruction method, teachers and researchers in active learning.
url https://ojs.cuni.cz/scied/article/view/298
work_keys_str_mv AT janasestakova casestudyofusingpeerinstructionatuppersecondaryschool
_version_ 1724262498678341632