Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.

Human judgment and decision-making (JDM) requires an assessment of different choice options. While traditional theories of choice argue that cognitive processes are the main driver to reach a decision, growing evidence highlights the importance of emotion in decision-making. Following these findings...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Ring, Christian Kaernbach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4376384?pdf=render
id doaj-570d00b7d8d74084b67f9c4f806ed505
record_format Article
spelling doaj-570d00b7d8d74084b67f9c4f806ed5052020-11-25T00:24:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e012098910.1371/journal.pone.0120989Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.Patrick RingChristian KaernbachHuman judgment and decision-making (JDM) requires an assessment of different choice options. While traditional theories of choice argue that cognitive processes are the main driver to reach a decision, growing evidence highlights the importance of emotion in decision-making. Following these findings, it appears relevant to understand how individuals asses the attractiveness or riskiness of a situation in terms of emotional processes. The following study aims at a better understanding of the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying threat sensitivity by measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) in passive threat situations. While previous studies demonstrate the role of magnitude on emotional body reactions preceding an outcome, this study focuses on probability. In order to analyze emotional body reactions preceding negative events with varying probability of occurrence, we have our participants play a two-stage card game. The first stage of the card game reveals the probability of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. The second stage applies the electric shock with the previously announced probability. For the analysis, we focus on the time interval between the first and second stage. We observe a linear relation between SCRs in anticipation of receiving an electric shock and shock probability. This finding indicates that SCRs are able to code the likelihood of negative events. We outline how this coding function of SCRs during the anticipation of negative events might add to an understanding of human JDM.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4376384?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Ring
Christian Kaernbach
spellingShingle Patrick Ring
Christian Kaernbach
Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Patrick Ring
Christian Kaernbach
author_sort Patrick Ring
title Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
title_short Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
title_full Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
title_fullStr Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
title_sort sensitivity towards fear of electric shock in passive threat situations.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Human judgment and decision-making (JDM) requires an assessment of different choice options. While traditional theories of choice argue that cognitive processes are the main driver to reach a decision, growing evidence highlights the importance of emotion in decision-making. Following these findings, it appears relevant to understand how individuals asses the attractiveness or riskiness of a situation in terms of emotional processes. The following study aims at a better understanding of the psychophysiological mechanisms underlying threat sensitivity by measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) in passive threat situations. While previous studies demonstrate the role of magnitude on emotional body reactions preceding an outcome, this study focuses on probability. In order to analyze emotional body reactions preceding negative events with varying probability of occurrence, we have our participants play a two-stage card game. The first stage of the card game reveals the probability of receiving an unpleasant electric shock. The second stage applies the electric shock with the previously announced probability. For the analysis, we focus on the time interval between the first and second stage. We observe a linear relation between SCRs in anticipation of receiving an electric shock and shock probability. This finding indicates that SCRs are able to code the likelihood of negative events. We outline how this coding function of SCRs during the anticipation of negative events might add to an understanding of human JDM.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4376384?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickring sensitivitytowardsfearofelectricshockinpassivethreatsituations
AT christiankaernbach sensitivitytowardsfearofelectricshockinpassivethreatsituations
_version_ 1725352404559331328