Quantifying the Sensitivity of NDVI-Based C Factor Estimation and Potential Soil Erosion Prediction using Spaceborne Earth Observation Data

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), has been increasingly used to capture spatiotemporal variations in cover factor (C) determination for erosion prediction on a larger landscape scale. However, NDVI-based C factor (C<sub>ndvi</sub>) estimation per se is sensitive to vario...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawit A. Ayalew, Detlef Deumlich, Bořivoj Šarapatka, Daniel Doktor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/7/1136
Description
Summary:The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), has been increasingly used to capture spatiotemporal variations in cover factor (C) determination for erosion prediction on a larger landscape scale. However, NDVI-based C factor (C<sub>ndvi</sub>) estimation per se is sensitive to various biophysical variables, such as soil condition, topographic features, and vegetation phenology. As a result, C<sub>ndvi</sub> often results in incorrect values that affect the quality of soil erosion prediction. The aim of this study is to multi-temporally estimate C<sub>ndvi</sub> values and compare the values with those of literature values (C<sub>lit</sub>) in order to quantify discrepancies between C values obtained via NDVI and empirical-based methods. A further aim is to quantify the effect of biophysical variables such as slope shape, erodibility, and crop growth stage variation on C<sub>ndvi</sub> and soil erosion prediction on an agricultural landscape scale. Multi-temporal Landsat 7, Landsat 8, and Sentinel 2 data, from 2013 to 2016, were used in combination with high resolution agricultural land use data of the Integrated Administrative and Control System, from the Uckermark district of north-eastern Germany. Correlations between C<sub>ndvi</sub> and C<sub>lit</sub> improved in data from spring and summer seasons (up to <i>r</i> = 0.93); nonetheless, the C<sub>ndvi</sub> values were generally higher compared with C<sub>lit</sub> values. Consequently, modelling erosion using C<sub>ndvi</sub> resulted in two times higher rates than modelling with C<sub>lit</sub>. The C<sub>ndvi</sub> values were found to be sensitive to soil erodibility condition and slope shape of the landscape. Higher erodibility condition was associated with higher C<sub>ndvi</sub> values. Spring and summer taken images showed significant sensitivity to heterogeneous soil condition. The C<sub>ndvi</sub> estimation also showed varying sensitivity to slope shape variation; values on convex-shaped slopes were higher compared with flat slopes. Quantifying the sensitivity of C<sub>ndvi</sub> values to biophysical variables may help improve capturing spatiotemporal variability of C factor values in similar landscapes and conditions.
ISSN:2072-4292