A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking.
INTRODUCTION:Recent evidence suggests that text messaging may help to reduce problem drinking as an extension to in-person services, but very little is known about the effectiveness of remote messaging on problem drinking as a stand-alone intervention, or how different types of messages may improve...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5287456?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-56d08d2fdfcc49f5b0f0207e92883238 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-56d08d2fdfcc49f5b0f0207e928832382020-11-25T02:10:30ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e016790010.1371/journal.pone.0167900A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking.Frederick MuenchKatherine van Stolk-CookeAlexis KuerbisGertraud StadlerAmit BaumelSijing ShaoJames R McKayJon MorgensternINTRODUCTION:Recent evidence suggests that text messaging may help to reduce problem drinking as an extension to in-person services, but very little is known about the effectiveness of remote messaging on problem drinking as a stand-alone intervention, or how different types of messages may improve drinking outcomes in those seeking to moderate their alcohol consumption. METHODS:We conducted an exploratory, single-blind randomized controlled pilot study comparing four different types of alcohol reduction-themed text messages sent daily to weekly drink self-tracking texts in order to determine their impact on drinking outcomes over a 12-week period in 152 participants (≈ 30 per group) seeking to reduce their drinking on the internet. Messaging interventions included: weekly drink self-tracking mobile assessment texts (MA), loss-framed texts (LF), gain-framed texts (GF), static tailored texts (ST), and adaptive tailored texts (TA). Poisson and least squares regressions were used to compare differences between each active messaging group and the MA control. RESULTS:When adjusting for baseline drinking, participants in all messaging groups except GF significantly reduced the number of drinks consumed per week and the number of heavy drinking days compared to MA. Only the TA and GF groups were significantly different from MA in reducing the number of drinking days. While the TA group yielded the largest effect sizes on all outcome measures, there were no significant differences between active messaging groups on any outcome measure. 79.6% of individuals enrolled in the study wanted to continue receiving messages for an additional 12 weeks at the end of the study. DISCUSSION:Results of this pilot study indicate that remote automated text messages delivered daily can help adult problem drinkers reduce drinking frequency and quantity significantly more than once-a-week self-tracking messages only, and that tailored adaptive texts yield the largest effect sizes across outcomes compared to MA. Larger samples are needed to understand differences between messaging interventions and to target their mechanisms of efficacy.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5287456?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Frederick Muench Katherine van Stolk-Cooke Alexis Kuerbis Gertraud Stadler Amit Baumel Sijing Shao James R McKay Jon Morgenstern |
spellingShingle |
Frederick Muench Katherine van Stolk-Cooke Alexis Kuerbis Gertraud Stadler Amit Baumel Sijing Shao James R McKay Jon Morgenstern A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Frederick Muench Katherine van Stolk-Cooke Alexis Kuerbis Gertraud Stadler Amit Baumel Sijing Shao James R McKay Jon Morgenstern |
author_sort |
Frederick Muench |
title |
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking. |
title_short |
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking. |
title_full |
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking. |
title_fullStr |
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking. |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Different Mobile Messaging Interventions for Problem Drinking Compared to Weekly Drink Tracking. |
title_sort |
randomized controlled pilot trial of different mobile messaging interventions for problem drinking compared to weekly drink tracking. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
INTRODUCTION:Recent evidence suggests that text messaging may help to reduce problem drinking as an extension to in-person services, but very little is known about the effectiveness of remote messaging on problem drinking as a stand-alone intervention, or how different types of messages may improve drinking outcomes in those seeking to moderate their alcohol consumption. METHODS:We conducted an exploratory, single-blind randomized controlled pilot study comparing four different types of alcohol reduction-themed text messages sent daily to weekly drink self-tracking texts in order to determine their impact on drinking outcomes over a 12-week period in 152 participants (≈ 30 per group) seeking to reduce their drinking on the internet. Messaging interventions included: weekly drink self-tracking mobile assessment texts (MA), loss-framed texts (LF), gain-framed texts (GF), static tailored texts (ST), and adaptive tailored texts (TA). Poisson and least squares regressions were used to compare differences between each active messaging group and the MA control. RESULTS:When adjusting for baseline drinking, participants in all messaging groups except GF significantly reduced the number of drinks consumed per week and the number of heavy drinking days compared to MA. Only the TA and GF groups were significantly different from MA in reducing the number of drinking days. While the TA group yielded the largest effect sizes on all outcome measures, there were no significant differences between active messaging groups on any outcome measure. 79.6% of individuals enrolled in the study wanted to continue receiving messages for an additional 12 weeks at the end of the study. DISCUSSION:Results of this pilot study indicate that remote automated text messages delivered daily can help adult problem drinkers reduce drinking frequency and quantity significantly more than once-a-week self-tracking messages only, and that tailored adaptive texts yield the largest effect sizes across outcomes compared to MA. Larger samples are needed to understand differences between messaging interventions and to target their mechanisms of efficacy. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5287456?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT frederickmuench arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT katherinevanstolkcooke arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT alexiskuerbis arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT gertraudstadler arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT amitbaumel arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT sijingshao arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT jamesrmckay arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT jonmorgenstern arandomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT frederickmuench randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT katherinevanstolkcooke randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT alexiskuerbis randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT gertraudstadler randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT amitbaumel randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT sijingshao randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT jamesrmckay randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking AT jonmorgenstern randomizedcontrolledpilottrialofdifferentmobilemessaginginterventionsforproblemdrinkingcomparedtoweeklydrinktracking |
_version_ |
1724919386281607168 |