Properties of type IV plaster considering variation in the mold/model position during setting stage

• Main Authors: Tarcisio José de Arruda Paes Junior, Barbara Maegi, Rubens Nisie Tango, Wagner Ferreira do Nascimento, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Estevão Tomomitsu Kimpara
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic 2010-04-01
• Series: RGO: Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
• Subjects: hardness; dental materials; calcium sulfate; dureza; materiais dentários; sulfato de cálcio
• Online Access: http://www.revistargo.com.br/include/getdoc.php?id=4591&article=1013&mode=pdf

Objective: To assess the influence of the position of the mold during the setting stage of type IV stone plaster Durone (Dentsply Ind. Com., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), on the following properties: surface hardness and roughness. Methods: For the roughness test, two groups (n=6) in the form of pellets were prepared. In the first group, the surface of the base of the device was turned down during the plaster setting stage (N), in the second group this position was inverted, which has been described as an act of capsize it (E). For analysis, a roughness meter with reading precision of 0.01 μm was used. With regard to the hardness analysis, two groups with conical-shaped samples were obtained. The plasters were left to set under the same conditions of the mold/model position described for the previous experiment. Hardness measurement was performed in a durometer with a spherical penetrating tip for Rockwell readout. Three measurements were performed for each test specimen in both tests. Results: The hardness (N - 39.8, standard deviation = 3.3, E - 30.8, standard deviation = 5.6) and roughness data (N - 0.67, standard deviation = 0.17, E - 0.74, standard deviation = 0.13) submitted to the Student’s-t test (5%) showed no statistically significant differences for the roughness test (0.489), but showed statistically significant differences for the hardness test (0.014). Conclusion: The variation in the mold/model position influenced the final characteristics of the specimens in terms of hardness, since those obtained with the capsize technique showed lower surface hardness, whereas for roughness these differences were not statistically significant.