Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases

Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a major policy evaluation tool, for institutional processes, when they need to cope with fundamental risks, give voice to non-human agents, manage commons, and address environmental justice. The interplay of SEA with planning, unravels key issues and criti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raffaele Attardi, Alessandro Bonifazi, Carmelo M. Torre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-11-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
SEA
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/11/3042
id doaj-56c879569115467ca913d61e257793b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56c879569115467ca913d61e257793b52020-11-24T23:09:42ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502012-11-014113042306510.3390/su4113042Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian CasesRaffaele AttardiAlessandro BonifaziCarmelo M. TorreStrategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a major policy evaluation tool, for institutional processes, when they need to cope with fundamental risks, give voice to non-human agents, manage commons, and address environmental justice. The interplay of SEA with planning, unravels key issues and criticalities in both urban governance and environmental democracy. How can evaluation be developed to support the process? Structured evaluation methods applied in environmental assessment are maybe not sufficient to solve complex social conflicts. We point out some key reflections with the aim of opening up the discussion, by taking the case study of the environmental assessment of pollutant activities in the main industrial port cities of Southern Italy. They represent, at the moment, the most significant social criticality in our country, related to the interplay between environmental assessment and risk for labor. The paper focuses on the case study by mentioning the evolution of some thoughts about the red stripe that links sustainability, environmental democracy, and social evaluation, and illustrates the issues of these aspects in the case study, with the aim of underlining the difficulty of environmental assessment tools as a major support for planning processes, when social conflicts arise.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/11/3042social conflictpost normalityStrategic Environmental Assessmentindustrial port citiesSEAenvironmental democracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raffaele Attardi
Alessandro Bonifazi
Carmelo M. Torre
spellingShingle Raffaele Attardi
Alessandro Bonifazi
Carmelo M. Torre
Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases
Sustainability
social conflict
post normality
Strategic Environmental Assessment
industrial port cities
SEA
environmental democracy
author_facet Raffaele Attardi
Alessandro Bonifazi
Carmelo M. Torre
author_sort Raffaele Attardi
title Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases
title_short Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases
title_full Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases
title_fullStr Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Sustainability and Democracy in the Development of Industrial Port Cities: Some Italian Cases
title_sort evaluating sustainability and democracy in the development of industrial port cities: some italian cases
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a major policy evaluation tool, for institutional processes, when they need to cope with fundamental risks, give voice to non-human agents, manage commons, and address environmental justice. The interplay of SEA with planning, unravels key issues and criticalities in both urban governance and environmental democracy. How can evaluation be developed to support the process? Structured evaluation methods applied in environmental assessment are maybe not sufficient to solve complex social conflicts. We point out some key reflections with the aim of opening up the discussion, by taking the case study of the environmental assessment of pollutant activities in the main industrial port cities of Southern Italy. They represent, at the moment, the most significant social criticality in our country, related to the interplay between environmental assessment and risk for labor. The paper focuses on the case study by mentioning the evolution of some thoughts about the red stripe that links sustainability, environmental democracy, and social evaluation, and illustrates the issues of these aspects in the case study, with the aim of underlining the difficulty of environmental assessment tools as a major support for planning processes, when social conflicts arise.
topic social conflict
post normality
Strategic Environmental Assessment
industrial port cities
SEA
environmental democracy
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/11/3042
work_keys_str_mv AT raffaeleattardi evaluatingsustainabilityanddemocracyinthedevelopmentofindustrialportcitiessomeitaliancases
AT alessandrobonifazi evaluatingsustainabilityanddemocracyinthedevelopmentofindustrialportcitiessomeitaliancases
AT carmelomtorre evaluatingsustainabilityanddemocracyinthedevelopmentofindustrialportcitiessomeitaliancases
_version_ 1725609862788808704