Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat

In this study, the author attempts historical, theoretical and pragmatic approaches to a particularly characteristic aspect of the Basque language: the various 'forms of address' or linguistic registers.    In the opening section, he gathers information on the various judgments, explanatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Javier Alberdi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UPV/EHU Press 1986-04-01
Series:Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"
Online Access:https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/7727
id doaj-56b04e43f9bb45db97b38eb628fd92ec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56b04e43f9bb45db97b38eb628fd92ec2021-06-04T08:23:43ZengUPV/EHU PressAnuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"0582-61522444-29921986-04-0120110.1387/asju.7727Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur batJavier AlberdiIn this study, the author attempts historical, theoretical and pragmatic approaches to a particularly characteristic aspect of the Basque language: the various 'forms of address' or linguistic registers.    In the opening section, he gathers information on the various judgments, explanations and commentaries concerning this controversial subject that have been made by grammarians and lovers of Basque over the course of history. Precisely because this topic has been so hotly debated, the need has arisen for a critical viewpoint which would allow the objective contribution of each author to be evaluated through the prism of linguistic analysis.    Beginning with the 17th century, and for the first descriptive texts on the Basque language, and going up to the first third of the 20th century, the author reviews the contributions made by authors like: Oihenart, Pierre d'Urte, J. Etxeberri, Larramendi, P.P. Astarloa, Añibarro, Zabala, Lardizabal, Inchauspe, Bonaparte, A. Campion, Ithurry, S. Arana-Goiri, R.M. Azkue, J. Eguskitza, S. Altube and H. Schuchardt. Through this historical survey, certain faults are seen to come to light in the different approaches, such as an excessive preoccupation with etymology, an over-apologetic tone, or even various forms of prejudice which are mingled with otherwise valuable descriptions or pieces of information.https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/7727
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Javier Alberdi
spellingShingle Javier Alberdi
Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat
Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"
author_facet Javier Alberdi
author_sort Javier Alberdi
title Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat
title_short Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat
title_full Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat
title_fullStr Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat
title_full_unstemmed Euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: I. historia apur bat
title_sort euskarazko tratamenduen ikuspegia: i. historia apur bat
publisher UPV/EHU Press
series Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"
issn 0582-6152
2444-2992
publishDate 1986-04-01
description In this study, the author attempts historical, theoretical and pragmatic approaches to a particularly characteristic aspect of the Basque language: the various 'forms of address' or linguistic registers.    In the opening section, he gathers information on the various judgments, explanations and commentaries concerning this controversial subject that have been made by grammarians and lovers of Basque over the course of history. Precisely because this topic has been so hotly debated, the need has arisen for a critical viewpoint which would allow the objective contribution of each author to be evaluated through the prism of linguistic analysis.    Beginning with the 17th century, and for the first descriptive texts on the Basque language, and going up to the first third of the 20th century, the author reviews the contributions made by authors like: Oihenart, Pierre d'Urte, J. Etxeberri, Larramendi, P.P. Astarloa, Añibarro, Zabala, Lardizabal, Inchauspe, Bonaparte, A. Campion, Ithurry, S. Arana-Goiri, R.M. Azkue, J. Eguskitza, S. Altube and H. Schuchardt. Through this historical survey, certain faults are seen to come to light in the different approaches, such as an excessive preoccupation with etymology, an over-apologetic tone, or even various forms of prejudice which are mingled with otherwise valuable descriptions or pieces of information.
url https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/7727
work_keys_str_mv AT javieralberdi euskarazkotratamenduenikuspegiaihistoriaapurbat
_version_ 1721397690952056832