Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain

Vlaho Brailo,1 Joanna M Zakrzewska2 1Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Facial Pain Unit, Division of Diagnostic, Surgical and Medical Sciences, Eastman Dental Hospital, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust/University College London, London, UK Bac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brailo V, Zakrzewska JM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-02-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/grading-the-intensity-of-nondental-orofacial-pain-identification-of-cu-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
id doaj-56ad3c593011434086594b7519f55fbe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-56ad3c593011434086594b7519f55fbe2020-11-24T22:50:12ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902015-02-012015default9510420576Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe painBrailo VZakrzewska JM Vlaho Brailo,1 Joanna M Zakrzewska2 1Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Facial Pain Unit, Division of Diagnostic, Surgical and Medical Sciences, Eastman Dental Hospital, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust/University College London, London, UK Background: When assessing pain in clinical practice, clinicians often label pain as mild, moderate, and severe. However, these categories are not distinctly defined, and are often used arbitrarily. Instruments for pain assessment use more sophisticated scales, such as a 0–10 numerical rating scale, and apart from pain intensity assess pain-related interference and disability. The aim of the study was to identify cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe nondental orofacial pain using a numerical rating scale, a pain-related interference scale, and a disability measurement. Materials and methods: A total of 245 patients referred to the Facial Pain Unit in London were included in the study. Intensity and pain-related interference were assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory. Pain-related disability was assessed by the Chronic Graded Pain Scale. Average pain intensity (0–10) was classified into nine schemes with varying cutoff points of mild, moderate, and severe pain. The scheme with the most significant intergroup difference, expressed by multivariate analysis of variance, provided the cutoffs between mild, moderate, and severe pain. Results: The combination that showed the greatest intergroup differences for all patients was scheme 47 (mild 1–4, moderate 5–7, severe 8–10). The same combination provided the greatest intergroup differences in subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorder and chronic idiopathic facial pain, respectively. Among the trigeminal neuralgia patients alone, the combination with the highest intergroup differences was scheme 48 (mild 1–4, moderate 5–8, severe 9–10). Conclusion: The cutoff points established in this study can discriminate in pain intensity categories reasonably well, and showed a significant difference in most of the outcome measures used. Keywords: chronic orofacial pain, cutoff point, trigeminal neuralgia, temporomandibular disorderhttp://www.dovepress.com/grading-the-intensity-of-nondental-orofacial-pain-identification-of-cu-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brailo V
Zakrzewska JM
spellingShingle Brailo V
Zakrzewska JM
Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
Journal of Pain Research
author_facet Brailo V
Zakrzewska JM
author_sort Brailo V
title Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_short Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_full Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_fullStr Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_full_unstemmed Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
title_sort grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Journal of Pain Research
issn 1178-7090
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Vlaho Brailo,1 Joanna M Zakrzewska2 1Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Facial Pain Unit, Division of Diagnostic, Surgical and Medical Sciences, Eastman Dental Hospital, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust/University College London, London, UK Background: When assessing pain in clinical practice, clinicians often label pain as mild, moderate, and severe. However, these categories are not distinctly defined, and are often used arbitrarily. Instruments for pain assessment use more sophisticated scales, such as a 0–10 numerical rating scale, and apart from pain intensity assess pain-related interference and disability. The aim of the study was to identify cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe nondental orofacial pain using a numerical rating scale, a pain-related interference scale, and a disability measurement. Materials and methods: A total of 245 patients referred to the Facial Pain Unit in London were included in the study. Intensity and pain-related interference were assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory. Pain-related disability was assessed by the Chronic Graded Pain Scale. Average pain intensity (0–10) was classified into nine schemes with varying cutoff points of mild, moderate, and severe pain. The scheme with the most significant intergroup difference, expressed by multivariate analysis of variance, provided the cutoffs between mild, moderate, and severe pain. Results: The combination that showed the greatest intergroup differences for all patients was scheme 47 (mild 1–4, moderate 5–7, severe 8–10). The same combination provided the greatest intergroup differences in subgroups of patients with temporomandibular disorder and chronic idiopathic facial pain, respectively. Among the trigeminal neuralgia patients alone, the combination with the highest intergroup differences was scheme 48 (mild 1–4, moderate 5–8, severe 9–10). Conclusion: The cutoff points established in this study can discriminate in pain intensity categories reasonably well, and showed a significant difference in most of the outcome measures used. Keywords: chronic orofacial pain, cutoff point, trigeminal neuralgia, temporomandibular disorder
url http://www.dovepress.com/grading-the-intensity-of-nondental-orofacial-pain-identification-of-cu-peer-reviewed-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT brailov gradingtheintensityofnondentalorofacialpainidentificationofcutoffpointsformildmoderateandseverepain
AT zakrzewskajm gradingtheintensityofnondentalorofacialpainidentificationofcutoffpointsformildmoderateandseverepain
_version_ 1725673501113712640