Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings
We focus on the problem of multi-party data sharing in high dimensional data settings where the number of measured features (or the dimension) p is frequently much larger than the number of subjects (or the sample size) n, the so-called p >> n scenario that has been the focus of much recent s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Labor Dynamics Institute
2012-07-01
|
Series: | The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/view/618 |
id |
doaj-56a1b3afc97b4d35a004519bf05b238a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-56a1b3afc97b4d35a004519bf05b238a2020-11-25T01:32:35ZengLabor Dynamics InstituteThe Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality2575-85272012-07-014110.29012/jpc.v4i1.618Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification SettingsStephen E. Fienberg0Jiashun Jin1Departmen t of Statistics, Machine Learning Department, Living analytics Research Center, Cylab, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PADepartment of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA We focus on the problem of multi-party data sharing in high dimensional data settings where the number of measured features (or the dimension) p is frequently much larger than the number of subjects (or the sample size) n, the so-called p >> n scenario that has been the focus of much recent statistical research. Here, we consider data sharing for two interconnected problems in high dimensional data analysis, namely the feature selection and classification. We characterize the notions of ``cautious", ``regular", and ``generous" data sharing in terms of their privacy-preserving implications for the parties and their share of data, with focus on the ``feature privacy" rather than the ``sample privacy", though the violation of the former may lead to the latter. We evaluate the data sharing methods using {\it phase diagram} from the statistical literature on multiplicity and Higher Criticism thresholding. In the two-dimensional phase space calibrated by the signal sparsity and signal strength, a phase diagram is a partition of the phase space and contains three distinguished regions, where we have no (feature)-privacy violation, relatively rare privacy violations, and an overwhelming amount of privacy violation. https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/view/618Hamming distanceHigher CriticismLASSOMarginal RegressionNoise AdditionPhase Diagram |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephen E. Fienberg Jiashun Jin |
spellingShingle |
Stephen E. Fienberg Jiashun Jin Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality Hamming distance Higher Criticism LASSO Marginal Regression Noise Addition Phase Diagram |
author_facet |
Stephen E. Fienberg Jiashun Jin |
author_sort |
Stephen E. Fienberg |
title |
Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings |
title_short |
Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings |
title_full |
Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings |
title_fullStr |
Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in High Dimensional Regression and Classification Settings |
title_sort |
privacy-preserving data sharing in high dimensional regression and classification settings |
publisher |
Labor Dynamics Institute |
series |
The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality |
issn |
2575-8527 |
publishDate |
2012-07-01 |
description |
We focus on the problem of multi-party data sharing in high dimensional data settings where the number of measured features (or the dimension) p is frequently much larger than the number of subjects (or the sample size) n, the so-called p >> n scenario that has been the focus of much recent statistical research. Here, we consider data sharing for two interconnected problems in high dimensional data analysis, namely the feature selection and classification. We characterize the notions of ``cautious", ``regular", and ``generous" data sharing in terms of their privacy-preserving implications for the parties and their share of data, with focus on the ``feature privacy" rather than the ``sample privacy", though the violation of the former may lead to the latter. We evaluate the data sharing methods using {\it phase diagram} from the statistical literature on multiplicity and Higher Criticism thresholding. In the two-dimensional phase space calibrated by the signal sparsity and signal strength, a phase diagram is a partition of the phase space and contains three distinguished regions, where we have no (feature)-privacy violation, relatively rare privacy violations, and an overwhelming amount of privacy violation.
|
topic |
Hamming distance Higher Criticism LASSO Marginal Regression Noise Addition Phase Diagram |
url |
https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/view/618 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephenefienberg privacypreservingdatasharinginhighdimensionalregressionandclassificationsettings AT jiashunjin privacypreservingdatasharinginhighdimensionalregressionandclassificationsettings |
_version_ |
1725081178693697536 |