Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model

The interaction between human head model and electromagnetic field sources is studied. The head models are composed of one and six layers. The six layers are skin, fat, bone, dura (the outer membrane of brain and spinal cord), CSF (colony stimulating factor), and brain. An antenna as a source of exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asma Lak, Homayoon Oraizi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/580872
id doaj-569b46bb80ed490d83bb6d30853d5e58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-569b46bb80ed490d83bb6d30853d5e582020-11-24T23:35:49ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Antennas and Propagation1687-58691687-58772013-01-01201310.1155/2013/580872580872Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head ModelAsma Lak0Homayoon Oraizi1Young Researchers Club, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, IranIran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, IranThe interaction between human head model and electromagnetic field sources is studied. The head models are composed of one and six layers. The six layers are skin, fat, bone, dura (the outer membrane of brain and spinal cord), CSF (colony stimulating factor), and brain. An antenna as a source of exposure is simulated too. The E-field strength distribution in both one- and six-layer human models is shown to estimate the intensity of E-field penetration in human head. Like standard models, the antenna is situated near the head model at a distance of 5 mm. The local and average SARs (specific absorption rates) are simulated at 900 MHz in both human head models. The results are then compared between the two models. The HFSS software is used for all the simulations. The paper wants to show that the initial model (one layer) is not a good model, because the real human head tissue is not equivalently modeled. It seems that the values of one-layer model are not reliable, so the paper considers the better and more similar human head model and compares these two models.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/580872
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Asma Lak
Homayoon Oraizi
spellingShingle Asma Lak
Homayoon Oraizi
Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
author_facet Asma Lak
Homayoon Oraizi
author_sort Asma Lak
title Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model
title_short Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model
title_full Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model
title_fullStr Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of SAR Distribution in Six-Layer Human Head Model
title_sort evaluation of sar distribution in six-layer human head model
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
issn 1687-5869
1687-5877
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The interaction between human head model and electromagnetic field sources is studied. The head models are composed of one and six layers. The six layers are skin, fat, bone, dura (the outer membrane of brain and spinal cord), CSF (colony stimulating factor), and brain. An antenna as a source of exposure is simulated too. The E-field strength distribution in both one- and six-layer human models is shown to estimate the intensity of E-field penetration in human head. Like standard models, the antenna is situated near the head model at a distance of 5 mm. The local and average SARs (specific absorption rates) are simulated at 900 MHz in both human head models. The results are then compared between the two models. The HFSS software is used for all the simulations. The paper wants to show that the initial model (one layer) is not a good model, because the real human head tissue is not equivalently modeled. It seems that the values of one-layer model are not reliable, so the paper considers the better and more similar human head model and compares these two models.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/580872
work_keys_str_mv AT asmalak evaluationofsardistributioninsixlayerhumanheadmodel
AT homayoonoraizi evaluationofsardistributioninsixlayerhumanheadmodel
_version_ 1725524533253767168